Non-contact discharge estimation at a river site by using only the maximum surface flow velocity

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131505
Jitendra Kumar Vyas , Muthiah Perumal , Tommaso Moramarco
{"title":"Non-contact discharge estimation at a river site by using only the maximum surface flow velocity","authors":"Jitendra Kumar Vyas ,&nbsp;Muthiah Perumal ,&nbsp;Tommaso Moramarco","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study proposes a novel method of computing river discharge based on the maximum surface velocity recorded using a non-contact-based measurement at a singular water surface point. This location, generally, coincides with the maximum flow depth of the cross-section and accounts for the dip phenomena, where the maximum instream velocity occurs below the water surface. The method is based on information entropy theory developed by <span>Shannon (1948)</span> and applied to river hydraulics. In this study an alternate form of entropy is used to compute discharge as a function of the cross-sectional mean velocity, maximum velocity and shear velocity (<span>Keulegan,1938</span>) by minimizing the error of the state equilibrium constant, <span><math><mrow><mi>Φ</mi><mrow><mfenced><mrow><mi>M</mi></mrow></mfenced></mrow></mrow></math></span>, which is the ratio between the mean and maximum flow velocity, and that estimated using the Keulegan-based relationship. To test the accuracy of the proposed method, the maximum surface flow velocities measured at two gauging stations, each located on two different Italian rivers were studied. The estimated discharges by the proposed method were found to be comparable with the existing non-contact discharge method advocated by <span>Moramarco et al. (2017)</span> and, the traditional velocity-area method, using, e.g., the mean-section approach, based on the following metrics: the Nash-sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), the coefficient of correlation and the percent bias (PBIAS). The mean velocity error emulates a Gaussian distribution for both the gauging stations and was within 95% and 5% confidance levels. Further, the entropy-based velocity profiles generated by the proposed method at the y-axis are consistent with those of the depth-based velocity profiles observed by the mechanical-current meter, thus, proving the appropriateness of the proposed discharge estimation method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424009016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study proposes a novel method of computing river discharge based on the maximum surface velocity recorded using a non-contact-based measurement at a singular water surface point. This location, generally, coincides with the maximum flow depth of the cross-section and accounts for the dip phenomena, where the maximum instream velocity occurs below the water surface. The method is based on information entropy theory developed by Shannon (1948) and applied to river hydraulics. In this study an alternate form of entropy is used to compute discharge as a function of the cross-sectional mean velocity, maximum velocity and shear velocity (Keulegan,1938) by minimizing the error of the state equilibrium constant, ΦM, which is the ratio between the mean and maximum flow velocity, and that estimated using the Keulegan-based relationship. To test the accuracy of the proposed method, the maximum surface flow velocities measured at two gauging stations, each located on two different Italian rivers were studied. The estimated discharges by the proposed method were found to be comparable with the existing non-contact discharge method advocated by Moramarco et al. (2017) and, the traditional velocity-area method, using, e.g., the mean-section approach, based on the following metrics: the Nash-sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), the coefficient of correlation and the percent bias (PBIAS). The mean velocity error emulates a Gaussian distribution for both the gauging stations and was within 95% and 5% confidance levels. Further, the entropy-based velocity profiles generated by the proposed method at the y-axis are consistent with those of the depth-based velocity profiles observed by the mechanical-current meter, thus, proving the appropriateness of the proposed discharge estimation method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仅利用最大地表流速估算河流站点的非接触式排水量
该研究提出了一种新颖的方法,即根据在单一水面点使用非接触式测量方法记录的最大表面速度来计算河流排放量。一般来说,这个位置与断面的最大水流深度相吻合,并考虑到了倾角现象,即最大流速出现在水面以下。该方法基于香农(1948 年)提出并应用于河流水力学的信息熵理论。在本研究中,使用了另一种形式的熵,通过最小化状态平衡常数 ΦM(即平均流速与最大流速之比)与基于 Keulegan 关系估算出的状态平衡常数的误差,来计算作为断面平均流速、最大流速和剪切流速(Keulegan,1938 年)函数的排泄量。为了测试所提方法的准确性,我们对意大利两条不同河流上的两个测量站所测得的最大地表流速进行了研究。根据以下指标:纳什-苏克里夫效率(NSE)、相关系数和偏差百分比(PBIAS),发现拟议方法估算的排水量与 Moramarco 等人(2017 年)倡导的现有非接触式排水量方法以及使用平均断面法等传统速度-面积方法不相上下。两个测站的平均速度误差均为高斯分布,误差率分别在 95% 和 5% 的范围内。此外,拟议方法在 Y 轴生成的基于熵的速度剖面与机械式流速仪观测到的基于深度的速度剖面一致,从而证明了拟议排水量估算方法的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Generation of root zone soil moisture from the integration of an all-weather satellite surface soil moisture estimates and an analytical model: A preliminary result in China DRSTF: A hybrid-approach framework for reservoir water temperature forecasting considering operation response Development of a modular distributed hydro-thermal coupled hydrological model for cold regions Vegetation greening mitigates the positive impacts of climate change on water availability in Northwest China Impacts of changing weather patterns on the dynamics of water pollutants in agricultural catchments: Insights from 11-year high temporal resolution data analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1