Fair value accounting standards and securities litigation

IF 6.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting & Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101705
Musaib Ashraf , Dain C. Donelson , John McInnis , Richard D. Mergenthaler
{"title":"Fair value accounting standards and securities litigation","authors":"Musaib Ashraf ,&nbsp;Dain C. Donelson ,&nbsp;John McInnis ,&nbsp;Richard D. Mergenthaler","doi":"10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine the effect of fair value standards on firms' litigation risk. The discretion required by fair value allows plaintiffs to “second guess” managers' judgments, potentially increasing litigation risk. Alternatively, the complexity of fair value may decrease litigation risk if it's more difficult to demonstrate scienter. Our evidence suggests firms that rely more on fair value standards are relatively less likely to be sued. We find no evidence of a relation between fair value and the risk of misstatements or fraud, but do find evidence of a slight increase in firms' litigation risk via an increase in volatility. However, the primary effect of fair value standards in reducing litigation risk dominates the volatility effect. Finally, we find average litigation rates increase after the passage of new standards, but less so for fair value standards. On balance, our evidence suggests fair value is a relatively low litigation risk area in GAAP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48438,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting & Economics","volume":"79 1","pages":"Article 101705"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165410124000351","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the effect of fair value standards on firms' litigation risk. The discretion required by fair value allows plaintiffs to “second guess” managers' judgments, potentially increasing litigation risk. Alternatively, the complexity of fair value may decrease litigation risk if it's more difficult to demonstrate scienter. Our evidence suggests firms that rely more on fair value standards are relatively less likely to be sued. We find no evidence of a relation between fair value and the risk of misstatements or fraud, but do find evidence of a slight increase in firms' litigation risk via an increase in volatility. However, the primary effect of fair value standards in reducing litigation risk dominates the volatility effect. Finally, we find average litigation rates increase after the passage of new standards, but less so for fair value standards. On balance, our evidence suggests fair value is a relatively low litigation risk area in GAAP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公允价值会计准则与证券诉讼
我们考察了公允价值准则对公司诉讼风险的影响。公允价值要求的自由裁量权允许原告“事后猜测”管理者的判断,潜在地增加了诉讼风险。另一方面,公允价值的复杂性可能会降低诉讼风险,如果它更难以证明科学。我们的证据表明,更多依赖公允价值标准的公司被起诉的可能性相对较小。我们没有发现公允价值与错报或欺诈风险之间存在关系的证据,但确实发现了通过波动性增加而略微增加公司诉讼风险的证据。然而,公允价值准则在降低诉讼风险方面的主要作用大于波动性效应。最后,我们发现新准则通过后,平均诉讼率有所上升,但公允价值准则的平均诉讼率则有所下降。总的来说,我们的证据表明公允价值在GAAP中是一个相对较低的诉讼风险领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting and Economics encourages the application of economic theory to the explanation of accounting phenomena. It provides a forum for the publication of the highest quality manuscripts which employ economic analyses of accounting problems. A wide range of methodologies and topics are encouraged and covered: * The role of accounting within the firm; * The information content and role of accounting numbers in capital markets; * The role of accounting in financial contracts and in monitoring agency relationships; * The determination of accounting standards; * Government regulation of corporate disclosure and/or the Accounting profession; * The theory of the accounting firm.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Reflections on the founding of The Journal of Accounting and Economics Do major corporate customers deter supplier misconduct? Trading of emission allowances and reporting incentives Estimating profitability decomposition frameworks via machine learning: Implications for earnings forecasting and financial statement analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1