AI-enhanced EEG signal interpretation: A novel approach using texture analysis with random forests

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Medical hypotheses Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111405

Jovana Paunovic Pantic , Svetlana Valjarevic , Jelena Cumic , Igor Pantic

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We hypothesize that the Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) and the Run-Length Matrix (RLM) techniques can effectively quantify discrete changes in EEG signals, and that the features extracted from these matrices can be utilized to train a Random Forest (RF) model. Our contribution includes the development of a robust code in sci-kit learn for a hypothetical model that, after adequate training and testing, could be used to detect and remove artifacts as well as differentiate between physiological and pathological EEG signals. Moreover, our approach envisions the RF model as a powerful tool capable of differentiating between normal and abnormal EEG signals. This approach could lead to the development of more potent AI tools that enhance clinical decision-making in neurology and psychiatry.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

人工智能增强型脑电信号解读：使用随机森林纹理分析的新方法

我们假设灰度共现矩阵（GLCM）和运行长度矩阵（RLM）技术可以有效量化脑电信号的离散变化，从这些矩阵中提取的特征可以用来训练随机森林（RF）模型。我们的贡献包括在 sci-kit learn 中为一个假设模型开发了健壮的代码，经过充分的训练和测试后，该模型可用于检测和去除伪迹，以及区分生理性和病理性脑电信号。此外，我们的方法还将射频模型设想为能够区分正常和异常脑电信号的强大工具。这种方法可以开发出更强大的人工智能工具，从而提高神经学和精神病学的临床决策水平。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Medical hypotheses 医学-医学：研究与实验

CiteScore

10.60

自引率

2.10%

发文量

167

审稿时长

60 days

期刊介绍： Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.