Environmental risk assessment of coastal dredging based on clustering of meteocean forcing

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Coastal Engineering Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104555
Chang He , Francesco De Leo , Alessandro Stocchino , Zhen-Yu Yin , Ana J. Abascal , Yin-Fu Jin
{"title":"Environmental risk assessment of coastal dredging based on clustering of meteocean forcing","authors":"Chang He ,&nbsp;Francesco De Leo ,&nbsp;Alessandro Stocchino ,&nbsp;Zhen-Yu Yin ,&nbsp;Ana J. Abascal ,&nbsp;Yin-Fu Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dredging and dumping in-situ sediments is a fundamental operation for most coastal engineering projects and coastal defense projects, such as the construction of breakwaters, beach nourishment and land reclamation. Future projections in terms of coastal hazard suggest that coastal protection and land reclamation project will be more and more frequent. In this context, the assessment of the environmental and socio-economic impact of the risk induced by dredging is a fundamental step during both the design stage and the operational management. Most of the standard practices and available risk assessment frameworks rely on the numerical prediction of the sediment plume in the large field driven by coastal circulations forced by tides, winds and waves. In this study, we formulated a new risk assessment framework based on an unsupervised machine learning clustering algorithm, K-means clustering, for generating representative meteocean scenarios subsequently used to force a regional circulation model. Moreover, we introduced three criteria of hazard/risk based on the spatial and temporal evolution of the suspended sediment concentration that explained different environmental impacts and two new methods to synthetically present the risk values. The major improvement of the present framework is that the final probability of risk fully describes the statistics in terms of hydrodynamic and dredging conditions.This framework presents the probability analysis of risk spatial distribution based on representative hydrodynamic conditions and dredging scenarios, which is a major improvement of this study compared with previous risk assessment strategies that were unable to predict quantified dredging risk before field construction. Finally, to demonstrate the potentiality of the risk assessment framework, we applied this methodology to the Hong Kong Water and Pearl River Estuary (China) as a pilot case.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50996,"journal":{"name":"Coastal Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coastal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378383924001030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dredging and dumping in-situ sediments is a fundamental operation for most coastal engineering projects and coastal defense projects, such as the construction of breakwaters, beach nourishment and land reclamation. Future projections in terms of coastal hazard suggest that coastal protection and land reclamation project will be more and more frequent. In this context, the assessment of the environmental and socio-economic impact of the risk induced by dredging is a fundamental step during both the design stage and the operational management. Most of the standard practices and available risk assessment frameworks rely on the numerical prediction of the sediment plume in the large field driven by coastal circulations forced by tides, winds and waves. In this study, we formulated a new risk assessment framework based on an unsupervised machine learning clustering algorithm, K-means clustering, for generating representative meteocean scenarios subsequently used to force a regional circulation model. Moreover, we introduced three criteria of hazard/risk based on the spatial and temporal evolution of the suspended sediment concentration that explained different environmental impacts and two new methods to synthetically present the risk values. The major improvement of the present framework is that the final probability of risk fully describes the statistics in terms of hydrodynamic and dredging conditions.This framework presents the probability analysis of risk spatial distribution based on representative hydrodynamic conditions and dredging scenarios, which is a major improvement of this study compared with previous risk assessment strategies that were unable to predict quantified dredging risk before field construction. Finally, to demonstrate the potentiality of the risk assessment framework, we applied this methodology to the Hong Kong Water and Pearl River Estuary (China) as a pilot case.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于气象强迫的沿海疏浚环境风险评估
疏浚和倾倒原地沉积物是大多数海岸工程和海防工程的基本作业,如修建防波堤、 海滩加固和填海造地。对未来海岸灾害的预测表明,海岸防护和填海工程将越来越频繁。在这种情况下,对疏浚引起的风险所造成的环境和社会经济影响进行评估,是设计阶 段和运行管理中的一个基本步骤。大多数标准做法和现有的风险评估框架都依赖于对受潮汐、风和波浪影响的沿岸环流所驱 动的大场中的沉积物羽流进行数值预测。在这项研究中,我们制定了一个新的风险评估框架,该框架基于一种无监督的机器学习聚类算法(K-means 聚类),用于生成具有代表性的气象情景,然后用于驱动区域环流模式。此外,我们还根据悬浮沉积物浓度的时空演变引入了三种危害/风险标准,以解释不同的环境影响,并引入了两种新方法来综合呈现风险值。本框架的主要改进在于,最终的风险概率充分描述了水动力和疏浚条件方面的统计数据。本框架根据代表性的水动力条件和疏浚方案,提出了风险空间分布的概率分析,与以往无法在现场施工前预测量化疏浚风险的风险评估策略相比,是本研究的一大改进。最后,为了证明风险评估框架的潜力,我们将该方法应用于香港水域和珠江口(中国)作为试点案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 工程技术-工程:大洋
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Coastal Engineering is an international medium for coastal engineers and scientists. Combining practical applications with modern technological and scientific approaches, such as mathematical and numerical modelling, laboratory and field observations and experiments, it publishes fundamental studies as well as case studies on the following aspects of coastal, harbour and offshore engineering: waves, currents and sediment transport; coastal, estuarine and offshore morphology; technical and functional design of coastal and harbour structures; morphological and environmental impact of coastal, harbour and offshore structures.
期刊最新文献
An enhanced model for an extreme wave impacting a vertical cylinder An adaptive internal mass source wave-maker for short wave generation Convergence and divergence of storm waves induced by multi-scale currents: Observations and coupled wave-current modeling Wave overtopping discharges at rubble mound structures in shallow water Computations of energetic nearshore waves: Are weakly dispersive phase-resolving models telling the same story?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1