Reductions in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Universally Insured American Health System

Vivitha Mani, Amanda Banaag, S. S. T. Miura, Satish Munigala, Christian L Coles, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, T. Koehlmoos
{"title":"Reductions in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Universally Insured American Health System","authors":"Vivitha Mani, Amanda Banaag, S. S. T. Miura, Satish Munigala, Christian L Coles, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, T. Koehlmoos","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n PSA testing is the primary method of screening for prostate cancer, although recommendations are varied. The COVID-19 pandemic diverted resources away from preventive screenings. We sought to examine alterations in PSA screening among TRICARE beneficiaries in the Military Health System (MHS) over the course of the pandemic.\n \n \n \n Using data from the MHS Data Repository, we executed a retrospective open cohort study of male TRICARE Prime beneficiaries aged 40 to 64 years during fiscal years 2018 to 2022. The study period was separated into 3 subperiods: prepandemic (October 1, 2017-February 28, 2020), early pandemic (March 1, 2020-September 30, 2020), and late pandemic (October 1, 2020-September 30, 2022).\n \n \n \n We found a 73% reduction in PSA screenings in the early pandemic and 14% decrease in the late pandemic compared with prepandemic rates. Compared with White men aged 50 to 54 years, men younger than 50 years in all racial groups were less likely to receive screening. In both pandemic periods, all racial groups, except for Black men, were overall more likely than White men to receive screening. Men were more likely to seek PSA screening in the private sector during the pandemic compared with prepandemic times (early pandemic: 1.21 RR, 1.20-1.22 95% confidence interval [CI]; late pandemic: 1.20 RR, 1.19-1.20 95% CI).\n \n \n \n We found significant reductions in PSA screening over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic among TRICARE beneficiaries. While disparities appear less pronounced when compared with other preventive testing, targeted outreach is still necessary for certain sociodemographic groups.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"61 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PSA testing is the primary method of screening for prostate cancer, although recommendations are varied. The COVID-19 pandemic diverted resources away from preventive screenings. We sought to examine alterations in PSA screening among TRICARE beneficiaries in the Military Health System (MHS) over the course of the pandemic. Using data from the MHS Data Repository, we executed a retrospective open cohort study of male TRICARE Prime beneficiaries aged 40 to 64 years during fiscal years 2018 to 2022. The study period was separated into 3 subperiods: prepandemic (October 1, 2017-February 28, 2020), early pandemic (March 1, 2020-September 30, 2020), and late pandemic (October 1, 2020-September 30, 2022). We found a 73% reduction in PSA screenings in the early pandemic and 14% decrease in the late pandemic compared with prepandemic rates. Compared with White men aged 50 to 54 years, men younger than 50 years in all racial groups were less likely to receive screening. In both pandemic periods, all racial groups, except for Black men, were overall more likely than White men to receive screening. Men were more likely to seek PSA screening in the private sector during the pandemic compared with prepandemic times (early pandemic: 1.21 RR, 1.20-1.22 95% confidence interval [CI]; late pandemic: 1.20 RR, 1.19-1.20 95% CI). We found significant reductions in PSA screening over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic among TRICARE beneficiaries. While disparities appear less pronounced when compared with other preventive testing, targeted outreach is still necessary for certain sociodemographic groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,美国普遍参保的医疗系统减少了前列腺特异性抗原筛查率
PSA 测试是筛查前列腺癌的主要方法,但建议各不相同。COVID-19 大流行占用了预防性筛查的资源。我们试图研究大流行期间军事卫生系统(MHS)中 TRICARE 受益人 PSA 筛查的变化。 利用军事卫生系统数据存储库中的数据,我们对 2018 至 2022 财年期间 40 至 64 岁的男性 TRICARE Prime 受益人进行了一项回顾性开放队列研究。研究期间分为 3 个子期间:大流行前期(2017 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 28 日)、大流行早期(2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 30 日)和大流行后期(2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日)。 我们发现,与大流行前相比,大流行早期的 PSA 筛查减少了 73%,大流行晚期减少了 14%。与 50 至 54 岁的白人男性相比,所有种族群体中 50 岁以下的男性接受筛查的可能性较低。在两次大流行期间,除黑人男性外,所有种族群体接受筛查的可能性总体上都高于白人男性。与大流行前相比,大流行期间男性更有可能在私营部门接受 PSA 筛查(大流行早期:1.21 RR,1.20-1.22 95% 置信区间 [CI];大流行后期:1.20 RR,1.19-1.20 95% CI)。 我们发现,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,TRICARE 受益人的 PSA 筛查率明显下降。虽然与其他预防性检测相比,差异似乎不那么明显,但仍有必要对某些社会人口群体进行有针对性的宣传。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urinary Bladder Melanosis Diagnosed Simultaneously With Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review Artificial Intelligence–Generated Patient Information Videos for Partial Nephrectomy by Medical Students With Expert Validation: A Pilot Study Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease Editorial Comment: Telehealth in Urology Beyond COVID-19 Limitations of ChatGPT for Patient Education Regarding Frequently Searched Questions About Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1