Tear Proteins Altered in Patients with Persistent Eye Pain after Refractive Surgery: Biomarker Candidate Discovery

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Proteome Research Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00339
Brooke M. Harkness, Siting Chen, Kilsun Kim, Ashok P. Reddy, Trevor J. McFarland, Deborah M. Hegarty, Steven J. Everist, Julie A. Saugstad, Jodi Lapidus, Anat Galor and Sue A. Aicher*, 
{"title":"Tear Proteins Altered in Patients with Persistent Eye Pain after Refractive Surgery: Biomarker Candidate Discovery","authors":"Brooke M. Harkness,&nbsp;Siting Chen,&nbsp;Kilsun Kim,&nbsp;Ashok P. Reddy,&nbsp;Trevor J. McFarland,&nbsp;Deborah M. Hegarty,&nbsp;Steven J. Everist,&nbsp;Julie A. Saugstad,&nbsp;Jodi Lapidus,&nbsp;Anat Galor and Sue A. Aicher*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Some patients develop persistent eye pain after refractive surgery, but factors that cause or sustain pain are unknown. We tested whether tear proteins of patients with pain 3 months after surgery differ from those of patients without pain. Patients undergoing refractive surgery (laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy ) were recruited from 2 clinics, and tears were collected 3 months after surgery. Participants rated their eye pain using a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0–10; no pain–worst pain) at baseline, 1 day, and 3 months after surgery. Using tandem mass tag proteomic analysis, we examined tears from patients with pain [NRS ≥ 3 at 3 months (<i>n</i> = 16)] and patients with no pain [NRS ≤ 1 at 3 months (<i>n</i> = 32)] after surgery. A subset of proteins (83 of 2748 detected, 3.0%) were associated with pain 3 months after surgery. High-dimensional statistical models showed that the magnitude of differential expression was not the only important factor in classifying tear samples from pain patients. Models utilizing 3 or 4 proteins had better classification performance than single proteins and represented differences in both directions (higher or lower in pain). Thus, patterns of protein differences may serve as biomarkers of postsurgical eye pain as well as potential therapeutic targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some patients develop persistent eye pain after refractive surgery, but factors that cause or sustain pain are unknown. We tested whether tear proteins of patients with pain 3 months after surgery differ from those of patients without pain. Patients undergoing refractive surgery (laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy ) were recruited from 2 clinics, and tears were collected 3 months after surgery. Participants rated their eye pain using a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0–10; no pain–worst pain) at baseline, 1 day, and 3 months after surgery. Using tandem mass tag proteomic analysis, we examined tears from patients with pain [NRS ≥ 3 at 3 months (n = 16)] and patients with no pain [NRS ≤ 1 at 3 months (n = 32)] after surgery. A subset of proteins (83 of 2748 detected, 3.0%) were associated with pain 3 months after surgery. High-dimensional statistical models showed that the magnitude of differential expression was not the only important factor in classifying tear samples from pain patients. Models utilizing 3 or 4 proteins had better classification performance than single proteins and represented differences in both directions (higher or lower in pain). Thus, patterns of protein differences may serve as biomarkers of postsurgical eye pain as well as potential therapeutic targets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
屈光手术后持续眼痛患者的泪液蛋白发生变化:发现候选生物标志物。
一些患者在屈光手术后会出现持续性眼痛,但引起或维持疼痛的因素尚不清楚。我们测试了术后 3 个月疼痛患者的泪液蛋白与无疼痛患者的泪液蛋白是否存在差异。我们从两家诊所招募了接受屈光手术(激光原位角膜磨镶术或光性屈光性角膜切除术)的患者,并在术后 3 个月收集了他们的泪液。受试者在基线、术后 1 天和 3 个月使用数字评分量表(NRS,0-10;无痛-最痛)对其眼部疼痛进行评分。通过串联质量标签蛋白质组分析,我们检查了术后疼痛患者[3个月时NRS≥3(16人)]和无痛患者[3个月时NRS≤1(32人)]的泪液。一部分蛋白质(2748 个蛋白质中有 83 个被检测到,占 3.0%)与术后 3 个月的疼痛有关。高维统计模型显示,差异表达的大小并不是对疼痛患者的泪液样本进行分类的唯一重要因素。利用 3 或 4 种蛋白质建立的模型比单一蛋白质的分类效果更好,而且能代表两个方向的差异(疼痛程度较高或较低)。因此,蛋白质差异模式可作为手术后眼痛的生物标志物以及潜在的治疗目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
期刊最新文献
Characterization of Inflammatory Mediators and Metabolome in Interstitial Fluid Collected with Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion before and at the End of Dupilumab Treatment in Atopic Dermatitis. Improving Proteomic Identification Using Narrow Isolation Windows with Zeno SWATH Data-Independent Acquisition. The Spatial Extracellular Proteomic Tumor Microenvironment Distinguishes Molecular Subtypes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Venomics and Peptidomics of Palearctic Vipers: A Clade-Wide Analysis of Seven Taxa of the Genera Vipera, Montivipera, Macrovipera, and Daboia across Türkiye. Are We There Yet? Assessing the Readiness of Single-Cell Proteomics to Answer Biological Hypotheses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1