Effects of physical activity planning interventions on reducing sedentary behavior in parent-child dyads: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Applied psychology. Health and well-being Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1111/aphw.12565
Zofia Szczuka, Ewa Kulis, Anna Banik, Monika Boberska, Maria Siwa, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Paulina Krzywicka, Natalia Paduszynska, Nina Knoll, Theda Radtke, Konstantin Schenkel, Genevieve F Dunton, Aleksandra Luszczynska
{"title":"Effects of physical activity planning interventions on reducing sedentary behavior in parent-child dyads: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Zofia Szczuka, Ewa Kulis, Anna Banik, Monika Boberska, Maria Siwa, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Paulina Krzywicka, Natalia Paduszynska, Nina Knoll, Theda Radtke, Konstantin Schenkel, Genevieve F Dunton, Aleksandra Luszczynska","doi":"10.1111/aphw.12565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effects of parent-child dyad interventions on behavior remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated if, compared with a control condition, three types of physical activity (PA) planning interventions (individual \"I-for-me,\" dyadic \"we-for-me,\" and collaborative \"we-for-us\") would reduce sedentary behavior (SB) time in parents and their children. The study involved 247 dyads comprising parents (aged 29-66) and their children (aged 9-15), randomized into one of the three types of PA planning-intervention arms or the control condition. Mixed models were applied to analyze data from a preregistered trial (NCT02713438) with the outcome of accelerometer-measured SB time, assessed at 1-week and 36-week follow-ups. Although children's SB remained unaffected by the planning interventions, a small reduction of SB time was found among parents in the collaborative (p = .048) and individual (p = .042) planning conditions. The effects were observed at the 1-week follow-up only. While short-term reductions in parents' SB were achieved, these were not sustained long-term. PA planning interventions delivered to parent-child dyads did not substantially reduce children's SB, which may be due to young people's needs of increased independence from their parents.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effects of parent-child dyad interventions on behavior remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial investigated if, compared with a control condition, three types of physical activity (PA) planning interventions (individual "I-for-me," dyadic "we-for-me," and collaborative "we-for-us") would reduce sedentary behavior (SB) time in parents and their children. The study involved 247 dyads comprising parents (aged 29-66) and their children (aged 9-15), randomized into one of the three types of PA planning-intervention arms or the control condition. Mixed models were applied to analyze data from a preregistered trial (NCT02713438) with the outcome of accelerometer-measured SB time, assessed at 1-week and 36-week follow-ups. Although children's SB remained unaffected by the planning interventions, a small reduction of SB time was found among parents in the collaborative (p = .048) and individual (p = .042) planning conditions. The effects were observed at the 1-week follow-up only. While short-term reductions in parents' SB were achieved, these were not sustained long-term. PA planning interventions delivered to parent-child dyads did not substantially reduce children's SB, which may be due to young people's needs of increased independence from their parents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育活动计划干预对减少亲子二人组久坐行为的影响:随机对照试验。
亲子关系干预对行为的影响尚不明确。这项随机对照试验调查了与对照条件相比,三种类型的体力活动(PA)规划干预(个人 "我为人人"、双人 "我为人人 "和合作 "我为人人")是否会减少父母及其子女的久坐行为(SB)时间。该研究涉及 247 个由父母(29-66 岁)和子女(9-15 岁)组成的二人组,他们被随机分配到三种类型的 PA 计划干预组或对照组中。混合模型用于分析一项预先登记的试验(NCT02713438)的数据,其结果是加速度计测量的SB时间,在1周和36周的随访中进行评估。虽然儿童的 SB 不受计划干预的影响,但在合作计划(p = .048)和个人计划(p = .042)条件下,家长的 SB 时间略有减少。这些影响仅在一周的随访中观察到。虽然短期内减少了家长的 SB,但这些效果并不能长期维持。针对亲子二人组的 PA 规划干预并没有显著降低儿童的 SB,这可能是由于年轻人需要从父母身边获得更多的独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
期刊最新文献
Daily relationship satisfaction and markers of health: Findings from a smartphone-based assessment. Evaluation of a meaning in life intervention applied to work: A randomized clinical trial. Applying machine learning to understand the role of social-emotional skills on subjective well-being and physical health. Subjective well-being of children with special educational needs: Longitudinal predictors using machine learning. Increasing student well-being through a positive psychology intervention: changes in salivary cortisol, depression, psychological well-being, and hope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1