Exploration of the MCMC Wald test with linear regression.

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02426-z
Michael P Woller, Craig K Enders
{"title":"Exploration of the MCMC Wald test with linear regression.","authors":"Michael P Woller, Craig K Enders","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02426-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, Asparouhov and Muthén Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 1-14, (2021a, 2021b) proposed a variant of the Wald test that uses Markov chain Monte Carlo machinery to generate a chi-square test statistic for frequentist inference. Because the test's composition does not rely on analytic expressions for sampling variation and covariation, it potentially provides a way to get honest significance tests in cases where the likelihood-based test statistic's assumptions break down (e.g., in small samples). The goal of this study is to use simulation to compare the new MCM Wald test to its maximum likelihood counterparts, with respect to both their type I error rate and power. Our simulation examined the test statistics across different levels of sample size, effect size, and degrees of freedom (test complexity). An additional goal was to assess the robustness of the MCMC Wald test with nonnormal data. The simulation results uniformly demonstrated that the MCMC Wald test was superior to the maximum likelihood test statistic, especially with small samples (e.g., sample sizes less than 150) and complex models (e.g., models with five or more predictors). This conclusion held for nonnormal data as well. Lastly, we provide a brief application to a real data example.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02426-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, Asparouhov and Muthén Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 1-14, (2021a, 2021b) proposed a variant of the Wald test that uses Markov chain Monte Carlo machinery to generate a chi-square test statistic for frequentist inference. Because the test's composition does not rely on analytic expressions for sampling variation and covariation, it potentially provides a way to get honest significance tests in cases where the likelihood-based test statistic's assumptions break down (e.g., in small samples). The goal of this study is to use simulation to compare the new MCM Wald test to its maximum likelihood counterparts, with respect to both their type I error rate and power. Our simulation examined the test statistics across different levels of sample size, effect size, and degrees of freedom (test complexity). An additional goal was to assess the robustness of the MCMC Wald test with nonnormal data. The simulation results uniformly demonstrated that the MCMC Wald test was superior to the maximum likelihood test statistic, especially with small samples (e.g., sample sizes less than 150) and complex models (e.g., models with five or more predictors). This conclusion held for nonnormal data as well. Lastly, we provide a brief application to a real data example.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用线性回归探索 MCMC Wald 检验。
最近,Asparouhov 和 Muthén Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 1-14, (2021a, 2021b)提出了一种沃尔德检验的变体,它使用马尔科夫链蒙特卡罗机制生成用于频数主义推断的卡方检验统计量。由于该检验的构成不依赖于抽样变异和协变的分析表达式,因此在基于似然法的检验统计量的假设被打破的情况下(如在小样本中),它有可能提供一种获得真实显著性检验的方法。本研究的目的是通过模拟,比较新的 MCM Wald 检验与其最大似然检验的 I 类错误率和功率。我们的模拟检查了不同水平的样本量、效应大小和自由度(检验复杂性)的检验统计量。另一个目标是评估 MCMC Wald 检验在非正态数据下的稳健性。模拟结果一致表明,MCMC Wald 检验优于最大似然检验统计量,尤其是在小样本(如样本量小于 150)和复杂模型(如有五个或更多预测因子的模型)的情况下。这一结论也适用于非正态数据。最后,我们提供了一个真实数据示例的简要应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Publisher Correction: Dimensionality and optimal combination of autonomic fear-conditioning measures in humans. Author Correction: Discovering trends of social interaction behavior over time: An introduction to relational event modeling. Author Correction: r2mlm: An R package calculating R-squared measures for multilevel models. Correction: Development and validation of the Emotional Climate Change Stories (ECCS) stimuli set. Geofencing in location-based behavioral research: Methodology, challenges, and implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1