Infection risk associated with carnivore carcasses may govern trophic interactions between maggots and insectivorous passerine birds.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Biology Letters Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2024.0069
Akane Hashizume, Ryosuke Koda, Yoshihiro Nakashima
{"title":"Infection risk associated with carnivore carcasses may govern trophic interactions between maggots and insectivorous passerine birds.","authors":"Akane Hashizume, Ryosuke Koda, Yoshihiro Nakashima","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2024.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infection risk by pathogenic agents motivates hosts to avoid using resources with high risks. This, in turn, results in increased availability of these resources for other species that are more tolerant of infections. For instance, carcasses of mammalian carnivores are frequently avoided by conspecific or closely related carnivores, allowing them to be almost exclusively used by maggots. This may lead to novel interactions with other species. This study investigated the consumption of maggots from carnivore carcasses by non-corvid passerines. We successfully monitored 66 raccoon carcasses in Hokkaido, Japan, from 2016 to 2019. Vertebrates only scavenged 14 carcasses before maggot dispersal; the other 52 carcasses produced abundant maggots that regularly fed at least 12 species of non-corvid passerines. Surprisingly, predation occurred at a distance from the carcasses, mainly after maggot dispersal for pupation, despite the higher efficiency of feeding on maggot masses on the carcasses. Birds are likely to reduce the potential risk of infection from the carcass and/or from maggots on the carcasses. Overall, only 1% of maggots were consumed. Our results suggest that necrophagous flies could benefit from the infection risk associated with carnivore carcasses, which may decrease scavenging by other carnivores and constrain maggot consumption by insectivorous birds.</p>","PeriodicalId":9005,"journal":{"name":"Biology Letters","volume":"20 6","pages":"20240069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infection risk by pathogenic agents motivates hosts to avoid using resources with high risks. This, in turn, results in increased availability of these resources for other species that are more tolerant of infections. For instance, carcasses of mammalian carnivores are frequently avoided by conspecific or closely related carnivores, allowing them to be almost exclusively used by maggots. This may lead to novel interactions with other species. This study investigated the consumption of maggots from carnivore carcasses by non-corvid passerines. We successfully monitored 66 raccoon carcasses in Hokkaido, Japan, from 2016 to 2019. Vertebrates only scavenged 14 carcasses before maggot dispersal; the other 52 carcasses produced abundant maggots that regularly fed at least 12 species of non-corvid passerines. Surprisingly, predation occurred at a distance from the carcasses, mainly after maggot dispersal for pupation, despite the higher efficiency of feeding on maggot masses on the carcasses. Birds are likely to reduce the potential risk of infection from the carcass and/or from maggots on the carcasses. Overall, only 1% of maggots were consumed. Our results suggest that necrophagous flies could benefit from the infection risk associated with carnivore carcasses, which may decrease scavenging by other carnivores and constrain maggot consumption by insectivorous birds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与食肉动物尸体相关的感染风险可能会影响蛆虫与食虫通鸟之间的营养相互作用。
病原体的感染风险促使宿主避免使用高风险资源。这反过来又增加了这些资源对其他更能忍受感染的物种的可用性。例如,哺乳类食肉动物的尸体经常被同种或近缘食肉动物避开,使其几乎完全被蛆虫利用。这可能会导致与其他物种发生新的相互作用。本研究调查了非食肉类鸟类对食肉动物尸体上蛆虫的消耗情况。从2016年到2019年,我们在日本北海道成功监测了66具浣熊尸体。在蛆虫散播之前,仅有14具尸体被脊椎动物清扫;其他52具尸体产生了大量蛆虫,这些蛆虫定期为至少12种非鸟类被动昆虫提供食物。令人惊讶的是,尽管捕食尸体上的蝇蛆的效率较高,但捕食发生在距离尸体较远的地方,主要是在蝇蛆分散化蛹之后。鸟类可能会降低尸体和/或尸体上蛆虫的潜在感染风险。总体而言,只有1%的蛆被吃掉。我们的研究结果表明,食尸蝇可从食肉动物尸体的感染风险中获益,这可能会减少其他食肉动物的食腐行为,并限制食虫鸟类对蛆的食用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Letters
Biology Letters 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Previously a supplement to Proceedings B, and launched as an independent journal in 2005, Biology Letters is a primarily online, peer-reviewed journal that publishes short, high-quality articles, reviews and opinion pieces from across the biological sciences. The scope of Biology Letters is vast - publishing high-quality research in any area of the biological sciences. However, we have particular strengths in the biology, evolution and ecology of whole organisms. We also publish in other areas of biology, such as molecular ecology and evolution, environmental science, and phylogenetics.
期刊最新文献
Island size shapes genomic diversity in a great speciator (Aves: Zosterops). Selection for tameness alters play-like behaviour in red junglefowl in line with effects of domestication. The interconnected nature of multiple threats is impacting freshwater biodiversity. The combined effects of elevated predation risk and anthropogenic noise on dwarf mongoose vigilance behaviour. Food deprivation is associated with telomere elongation during hibernation in a primate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1