Clinical Versus Histologic Margins for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparing Outcomes for High-Risk Tumors Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
Margit L W Juhasz, Amanda H Rosenthal, Tuyet A Nguyen, Nima M Gharavi
{"title":"Clinical Versus Histologic Margins for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Comparing Outcomes for High-Risk Tumors Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery.","authors":"Margit L W Juhasz, Amanda H Rosenthal, Tuyet A Nguyen, Nima M Gharavi","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Traditionally, preoperative clinical tumor size ≥2 cm, based on Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) staging criteria, is high risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare outcomes of cSCC treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) with a preoperative size ≥2 cm (clinically ≥2 cm) versus cSCC with preoperative size <2 cm and postoperative defect size ≥2 cm (histologically ≥2 cm).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective data were collected from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, on MMS cases for cSCC with a preoperative and/or postoperative size ≥2 cm. Clinical outcomes were followed until March 15, 2023. Data were analyzed using multivariate regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred thirty cases of MMS for cSCC were included. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma clinically ≥2 cm occurred more frequently in elderly patients; cSCC histologically ≥2 cm were more commonly located in the H region, required wider surgical margins, and more MMS stages to achieve clearance. There were no significant differences in rates of recurrence and metastasis between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data suggest that postoperative (histologic) MMS defect size may allow for better risk stratification of high-risk cSCC and improved staging of cSCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1000-1004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: High-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Traditionally, preoperative clinical tumor size ≥2 cm, based on Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) staging criteria, is high risk.
Objective: To compare outcomes of cSCC treated with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) with a preoperative size ≥2 cm (clinically ≥2 cm) versus cSCC with preoperative size <2 cm and postoperative defect size ≥2 cm (histologically ≥2 cm).
Methods: Prospective data were collected from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, on MMS cases for cSCC with a preoperative and/or postoperative size ≥2 cm. Clinical outcomes were followed until March 15, 2023. Data were analyzed using multivariate regression.
Results: Three hundred thirty cases of MMS for cSCC were included. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma clinically ≥2 cm occurred more frequently in elderly patients; cSCC histologically ≥2 cm were more commonly located in the H region, required wider surgical margins, and more MMS stages to achieve clearance. There were no significant differences in rates of recurrence and metastasis between the groups.
Conclusion: These data suggest that postoperative (histologic) MMS defect size may allow for better risk stratification of high-risk cSCC and improved staging of cSCC.
期刊介绍:
Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including:
-Ambulatory phlebectomy-
Blepharoplasty-
Body contouring-
Chemical peels-
Cryosurgery-
Curettage and desiccation-
Dermabrasion-
Excision and closure-
Flap Surgery-
Grafting-
Hair restoration surgery-
Injectable neuromodulators-
Laser surgery-
Liposuction-
Microdermabrasion-
Microlipoinjection-
Micropigmentation-
Mohs micrographic surgery-
Nail surgery-
Phlebology-
Sclerotherapy-
Skin cancer surgery-
Skin resurfacing-
Soft-tissue fillers.
Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.