Proximal Discourses in Residential Facility Care Providers' Sense-Making of Their Communication with Family Members of a Loved One with Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2364394
Aimee E Miller-Ott, Tristin Evans
{"title":"Proximal Discourses in Residential Facility Care Providers' Sense-Making of Their Communication with Family Members of a Loved One with Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Aimee E Miller-Ott, Tristin Evans","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2364394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Families often stay involved in the care of a loved one with Alzheimer's disease even after relocation to a residential care facility, and through this transition, communication between the residential care providers and families becomes integral to keeping family informed and providing good care to the patient. However, care providers of people with Alzheimer's living in residential facilities find themselves overwhelmed by expectations related to their caregiving role and struggle with making sense of their experiences. Fifteen care providers of people with Alzheimer's disease living in a residential facility participated in qualitative, semi-structured interviews. Using relational dialectics theory as the framework through which to examine how residential facility care providers make sense of their communication with families of patients with Alzheimer's, analysis revealed three sets of competing proximal discourses: family inclusion and exclusion, reality and positivity, and expert and layperson provision of care. We address conclusions for scholars, implications for care providers and facilities, limitations, and suggestions for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"725-733"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2364394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Families often stay involved in the care of a loved one with Alzheimer's disease even after relocation to a residential care facility, and through this transition, communication between the residential care providers and families becomes integral to keeping family informed and providing good care to the patient. However, care providers of people with Alzheimer's living in residential facilities find themselves overwhelmed by expectations related to their caregiving role and struggle with making sense of their experiences. Fifteen care providers of people with Alzheimer's disease living in a residential facility participated in qualitative, semi-structured interviews. Using relational dialectics theory as the framework through which to examine how residential facility care providers make sense of their communication with families of patients with Alzheimer's, analysis revealed three sets of competing proximal discourses: family inclusion and exclusion, reality and positivity, and expert and layperson provision of care. We address conclusions for scholars, implications for care providers and facilities, limitations, and suggestions for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养老院护理人员在与阿尔茨海默氏症患者家属沟通时的近端论述。
即使在阿尔茨海默病患者搬迁到住宿护理机构后,其家人仍会继续参与对其亲人的护理,而在这一过渡时期,住宿护理提供者与家人之间的沟通对于让家人了解情况并为患者提供良好的护理是不可或缺的。然而,居住在养老院中的阿尔茨海默病患者的照护者发现自己被与照护角色相关的期望压得喘不过气来,并在努力了解自己的经历。15 名居住在养老院的阿尔茨海默病患者的护理人员参加了半结构化定性访谈。分析揭示了三组相互竞争的近端论述:家庭的包容与排斥、现实与积极、提供护理的专家与外行。我们讨论了对学者的结论、对护理提供者和护理机构的影响、局限性以及对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Role of User Participation in Emotional Contagion and Coping in Cancer Vlog Communities on YouTube. Much More Than Pretty Words: Poetry About the COVID-19 Vaccine Brings Healing and Community. The Struggle to Be "Fully Human": Women's Communicative Disenfranchisement and Ideological Formations in the U.S. Healthcare System. Analyzing the Discursive Framing of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUDs) in U.S. News Media: A Comparative Study of Benefits, Persuasion Methods, and Temporal Trends. Key Storytellers of Health Information Among Spanish-Speaking Latino Sexual Minority Men in the U.S.: Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to HIV Prevention and Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1