Use of resources in elderly patients consulting the emergency department: analysis of the Emergency Department and Elder Needs Cohort (EDEN-21).

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Internal and Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s11739-024-03638-z
Elena Fuentes, Javier Jacob, Juan González Del Castillo, Francisco Javier Montero-Pérez, Aitor Alquezar-Arbé, Eric Jorge García-Lamberechts, Sira Aguiló, Cesáreo Fernández-Alonso, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, Pascual Piñera, Lluís Llauger, Verónica Vázquez-Rey, Elena Carrasco-Fernández, Ricardo Juárez, María José Blanco-Hoffman, Eva de Las Nieves Rodríguez, Rafaela Rios-Gallardo, María Amparo Berenguer-Diez, Sandra Guiu, Nieves López-Laguna, Violeta Delgado-Sardina, Francisco Javier Diego-Robledo, Patxi Ezponda, Andrea Martínez-Lorenzo, Juan Vicente Ortega-Liarte, Inmaculada García-Rupérez, Setefilla Borne-Jerez, Adriana Gil-Rodrigo, Pere Llorens, Òscar Miró
{"title":"Use of resources in elderly patients consulting the emergency department: analysis of the Emergency Department and Elder Needs Cohort (EDEN-21).","authors":"Elena Fuentes, Javier Jacob, Juan González Del Castillo, Francisco Javier Montero-Pérez, Aitor Alquezar-Arbé, Eric Jorge García-Lamberechts, Sira Aguiló, Cesáreo Fernández-Alonso, Guillermo Burillo-Putze, Pascual Piñera, Lluís Llauger, Verónica Vázquez-Rey, Elena Carrasco-Fernández, Ricardo Juárez, María José Blanco-Hoffman, Eva de Las Nieves Rodríguez, Rafaela Rios-Gallardo, María Amparo Berenguer-Diez, Sandra Guiu, Nieves López-Laguna, Violeta Delgado-Sardina, Francisco Javier Diego-Robledo, Patxi Ezponda, Andrea Martínez-Lorenzo, Juan Vicente Ortega-Liarte, Inmaculada García-Rupérez, Setefilla Borne-Jerez, Adriana Gil-Rodrigo, Pere Llorens, Òscar Miró","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03638-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The elderly population frequently consults the emergency department (ED). This population could have greater use of EDs and hospital health resources. The EDEN cohort of patients aged 65 years or older visiting the ED allowed this association to be investigated. To analyse the association between healthcare resource use and the characteristics of patients over 65 years of age who consult hospital EDs. We performed an analysis of the EDEN cohort, a retrospective, analytical, and multipurpose registry that includes patients over 65 years of age who consulted in 52 Spanish EDs. The impact of age, sex, and characteristics of ageing on the following outcomes was studied: need for hospital admission (primary outcome) and need for observation, stay in the ED > 12 h, prolonged hospital stay > 7 days, need for intensive care unit (ICU) and return to the ED at 30 days related to the index visit (secondary outcomes). The association was analysed by calculating the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI), using a logistic regression model. A total of 25,557 patients with a mean age of 78.3 years were analysed, 45% were males. Of note was the presence of comorbidity, a Charlson index ≥ 3 (33%), and polypharmacy (66%). Observation in the ED was required by 26%, 25.4% were admitted to the hospital, and 0.9% were admitted to the ICU. The ED stay was > 12 h in 12.5% and hospital stay > 7 days in 13.5% of cases. There was a progressive increase in healthcare resource use based on age, with an aOR for the need for observation of 2.189 (95% CI 2.038-2.352), ED stay > 12 h 2.136 (95% CI 1.942-2.349) and hospital admission 2.579 (95% CI 2.399-2.772) in the group ≥ 85 years old. Most of the characteristics inherent to ageing (cognitive impairment, falls in the previous 6 months, polypharmacy, functional dependence, and comorbidity) were associated with significant increases in the use of healthcare resources, except for ICU admission, which was less in all the variables studied. Age and the characteristics inherent to ageing are associated with greater use of structural healthcare resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"247-256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03638-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The elderly population frequently consults the emergency department (ED). This population could have greater use of EDs and hospital health resources. The EDEN cohort of patients aged 65 years or older visiting the ED allowed this association to be investigated. To analyse the association between healthcare resource use and the characteristics of patients over 65 years of age who consult hospital EDs. We performed an analysis of the EDEN cohort, a retrospective, analytical, and multipurpose registry that includes patients over 65 years of age who consulted in 52 Spanish EDs. The impact of age, sex, and characteristics of ageing on the following outcomes was studied: need for hospital admission (primary outcome) and need for observation, stay in the ED > 12 h, prolonged hospital stay > 7 days, need for intensive care unit (ICU) and return to the ED at 30 days related to the index visit (secondary outcomes). The association was analysed by calculating the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI), using a logistic regression model. A total of 25,557 patients with a mean age of 78.3 years were analysed, 45% were males. Of note was the presence of comorbidity, a Charlson index ≥ 3 (33%), and polypharmacy (66%). Observation in the ED was required by 26%, 25.4% were admitted to the hospital, and 0.9% were admitted to the ICU. The ED stay was > 12 h in 12.5% and hospital stay > 7 days in 13.5% of cases. There was a progressive increase in healthcare resource use based on age, with an aOR for the need for observation of 2.189 (95% CI 2.038-2.352), ED stay > 12 h 2.136 (95% CI 1.942-2.349) and hospital admission 2.579 (95% CI 2.399-2.772) in the group ≥ 85 years old. Most of the characteristics inherent to ageing (cognitive impairment, falls in the previous 6 months, polypharmacy, functional dependence, and comorbidity) were associated with significant increases in the use of healthcare resources, except for ICU admission, which was less in all the variables studied. Age and the characteristics inherent to ageing are associated with greater use of structural healthcare resources.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科就诊老年患者的资源使用情况:急诊科和老年人需求队列(EDEN-21)分析。
老年人经常到急诊科(ED)就诊。这一人群可能会更多地使用急诊室和医院的医疗资源。EDEN队列中的65岁或以上急诊科就诊患者使我们得以研究这种关联。分析医疗资源的使用与医院急诊室就诊的 65 岁以上患者特征之间的关联。我们对 EDEN 队列进行了分析,这是一个具有回顾性、分析性和多功能性的登记系统,其中包括在西班牙 52 家急诊室就诊的 65 岁以上患者。我们研究了年龄、性别和老龄化特征对以下结果的影响:是否需要入院(主要结果)、是否需要观察、在急诊室停留时间是否超过 12 小时、住院时间是否超过 7 天、是否需要入住重症监护室 (ICU)、30 天后是否重返急诊室(次要结果)。通过使用逻辑回归模型计算调整后的几率比(aOR)及其 95% 的置信区间(CI)来分析两者之间的关联。共对 25557 名患者进行了分析,他们的平均年龄为 78.3 岁,其中 45% 为男性。值得注意的是,合并症、Charlson 指数≥ 3(33%)和多种药物(66%)的存在。26%的患者需要在急诊室接受观察,25.4%的患者需要住院治疗,0.9%的患者需要入住重症监护室。12.5%的病例在急诊室住院时间超过12小时,13.5%的病例住院时间超过7天。随着年龄的增长,医疗资源的使用也逐渐增加,在年龄≥85 岁的人群中,需要观察的 aOR 为 2.189(95% CI 2.038-2.352),急诊室停留时间大于 12 小时的 aOR 为 2.136(95% CI 1.942-2.349),住院的 aOR 为 2.579(95% CI 2.399-2.772)。大多数老龄化固有特征(认知障碍、前 6 个月跌倒、多药治疗、功能依赖和合并症)都与医疗资源使用量的显著增加有关,但入住重症监护室除外,因为在所有研究变量中,入住重症监护室的比例都较低。年龄和老龄化的固有特征与结构性医疗资源使用的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Traditional Chinese medicine challenging conventional Western medicine in cardiovascular diseases? Lower albumin levels are associated with 1-year mortality in older patients hospitalized for acute heart failure: THE ALBIMED-HF study. Cytisine for smoking cessation in hospitalised smokers with cardiovascular diseases: an observational study. Severe burn injuries and the impact of mental health: insights from 7 years at Switzerland's leading burn center. Comanagement of surgical patients between neurosurgeons and internal-medicine clinicians: observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1