Pub Date : 2024-11-18DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03813-2
Fernando Sebastian-Valles, Maria Sara Tapia-Sanchiz, Victor Navas-Moreno, Marta Lopez-Ruano, Carmen Martínez-Otero, Elena Carrillo-López, Carolina Sager La Ganga, Juan José Raposo-López, Selma Amar, Sara González-Castañar, Andres Von Wernitz Teleki, Carmen Del Arco, Jose Alfonso Arranz-Martín, Mónica Marazuela
SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are linked to a higher risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, it is still unclear whether the severity of SGLT-2i associated DKA is higher. This is a retrospective cohort study with patients admitted for DKA at a tertiary hospital (2013-2024). Patients were matched by propensity score for age, sex, diabetes duration, type, and ischemic heart disease. ICU admission risk and clinical severity were compared between SGLT-2i users and controls. The matched sample included 105 subjects (35 SGLT-2i users, 70 controls). The average age was 63.1 ± 15.4 years, and 40 (38.1%) patients were women. ICU admission was higher in the treatment group (65.7% versus 24.6%, p < 0.001). A conditional logistic regression showed higher risk of ICU admission in the treatment group (odds ratio 12.7, 95% confidence interval 1.9-84.3, p = 0.009) after adjusting for confounding factors. The treatment group exhibited less favorable blood gas results (pH 7.10 ± 0.17 vs 7.18 ± 0.16, p = 0.024) and shorter symptom duration (2 [1-3] vs 3 [2-7] days, p < 0.002). No significant differences were found in diabetes type, ketonemia, creatinine, or DKA precipitating factors. DKA in patients with diabetes treated with SGLT-2i is associated with more severe acidosis with quicker onset, leading to higher risk of ICU admission compared to patients not receiving this treatment. We recommend temporary discontinuation of SGLT-2i during any acute event until resolution, regardless of diabetes type or the patient's glycemic control.
{"title":"Chronic treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors is associated with ICU admission and disease severity in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis: a propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Fernando Sebastian-Valles, Maria Sara Tapia-Sanchiz, Victor Navas-Moreno, Marta Lopez-Ruano, Carmen Martínez-Otero, Elena Carrillo-López, Carolina Sager La Ganga, Juan José Raposo-López, Selma Amar, Sara González-Castañar, Andres Von Wernitz Teleki, Carmen Del Arco, Jose Alfonso Arranz-Martín, Mónica Marazuela","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03813-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03813-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are linked to a higher risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, it is still unclear whether the severity of SGLT-2i associated DKA is higher. This is a retrospective cohort study with patients admitted for DKA at a tertiary hospital (2013-2024). Patients were matched by propensity score for age, sex, diabetes duration, type, and ischemic heart disease. ICU admission risk and clinical severity were compared between SGLT-2i users and controls. The matched sample included 105 subjects (35 SGLT-2i users, 70 controls). The average age was 63.1 ± 15.4 years, and 40 (38.1%) patients were women. ICU admission was higher in the treatment group (65.7% versus 24.6%, p < 0.001). A conditional logistic regression showed higher risk of ICU admission in the treatment group (odds ratio 12.7, 95% confidence interval 1.9-84.3, p = 0.009) after adjusting for confounding factors. The treatment group exhibited less favorable blood gas results (pH 7.10 ± 0.17 vs 7.18 ± 0.16, p = 0.024) and shorter symptom duration (2 [1-3] vs 3 [2-7] days, p < 0.002). No significant differences were found in diabetes type, ketonemia, creatinine, or DKA precipitating factors. DKA in patients with diabetes treated with SGLT-2i is associated with more severe acidosis with quicker onset, leading to higher risk of ICU admission compared to patients not receiving this treatment. We recommend temporary discontinuation of SGLT-2i during any acute event until resolution, regardless of diabetes type or the patient's glycemic control.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142647963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The aging global population and the increasing use of antithrombotic agents have made spontaneous intramuscular hematomas (SIH) a growing concern. The association between the settings of SIH onset and clinical outcomes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine these associations. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Hiroshima, Japan between January 2008 and January 2022. We included consecutive patients aged ≥ 15 years with SIH at any site diagnosed by computed tomography. The subjects were divided into two groups according to onset settings: out-of-hospital onset and in-hospital onset. The main outcome was treatment failure (composite of change in initial treatment and in-hospital death), and in-hospital mortality was also assessed. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to estimate the causal effects of onset settings on outcomes. Of 84 included subjects with SIH, 63 had out-of-hospital onset and 21 had in-hospital onset. One subject (1.6%) with out-of-hospital onset and four subjects (19%) with in-hospital onset experienced treatment failure. In the IPTW cohort, in-hospital onset was associated with treatment failure [odds ratio (OR) 29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.2-270]. In addition, one subject (1.6%) with out-of-hospital onset and three subjects (14%) with in-hospital onset died during hospitalization. In-hospital onset was associated with a high rate of in-hospital mortality (OR 25, 95% CI 6.3-240) in the IPTW cohort. SIH with in-hospital onset had a poorer prognosis than that of SIH with out-of-hospital onset, suggesting that onset setting might be a novel predictor of clinical outcomes for SIH.
{"title":"Out-of-hospital onset versus in-hospital onset for clinical outcomes in spontaneous intramuscular hematoma diagnosed by computed tomography: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Satoshi Sera, Yuji Okazaki, Kyungko Huh, Toshihisa Ichiba, Yuki Kataoka","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03819-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03819-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aging global population and the increasing use of antithrombotic agents have made spontaneous intramuscular hematomas (SIH) a growing concern. The association between the settings of SIH onset and clinical outcomes remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine these associations. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Hiroshima, Japan between January 2008 and January 2022. We included consecutive patients aged ≥ 15 years with SIH at any site diagnosed by computed tomography. The subjects were divided into two groups according to onset settings: out-of-hospital onset and in-hospital onset. The main outcome was treatment failure (composite of change in initial treatment and in-hospital death), and in-hospital mortality was also assessed. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to estimate the causal effects of onset settings on outcomes. Of 84 included subjects with SIH, 63 had out-of-hospital onset and 21 had in-hospital onset. One subject (1.6%) with out-of-hospital onset and four subjects (19%) with in-hospital onset experienced treatment failure. In the IPTW cohort, in-hospital onset was associated with treatment failure [odds ratio (OR) 29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.2-270]. In addition, one subject (1.6%) with out-of-hospital onset and three subjects (14%) with in-hospital onset died during hospitalization. In-hospital onset was associated with a high rate of in-hospital mortality (OR 25, 95% CI 6.3-240) in the IPTW cohort. SIH with in-hospital onset had a poorer prognosis than that of SIH with out-of-hospital onset, suggesting that onset setting might be a novel predictor of clinical outcomes for SIH.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03817-y
Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Duaa Abdullah Bafail
The health implications of e-cigarette use compared to traditional cigarette smoking continue to attract significant public health interest. This study examines self-rated health (SRH) outcomes among exclusive e-cigarette users versus exclusive traditional cigarette smokers, using data from the Health Survey for England 2019. From an initial sample of 10,299 participants, the study focused on 8204 adults, excluding those aged 0-15. Further refinement to exclusive nicotine product users led to 274 e-cigarette users and 1017 cigarette smokers, after excluding dual users, never users, ex-users, non-responders, and users of other tobacco products such as pipes and cigars. SRH was derived from participants' responses to a question asking how they rated their general health, with five possible options: "very good", "good", "fair", "bad", and "very bad". For the purposes of this study, these responses were collapsed into two categories: "Good Health" (combining "very good" and "good") and "Poor Health" (combining "fair", "bad", and "very bad"). Consequently, 834 participants were classified as reporting good health, while 457 reported poor health. Binary logistic regression, adjusted for factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, residence, education, body mass index, alcohol use, age started smoking, physical or mental health conditions, and frequency of GP visits, revealed that exclusive e-cigarette users were significantly more likely to report good health compared to exclusive cigarette smokers, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.10 - 2.32, p = 0.014). As a sensitivity analysis, a generalized ordered logistic regression model was performed using the original five SRH categories. The adjusted model confirmed consistent results, with exclusive e-cigarette users showing higher odds of reporting better health across the full range of SRH outcomes (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08-1.82, p = 0.011). These findings suggest that exclusive e-cigarette users perceive their health more positively than traditional cigarette smokers, contributing useful insights to the discussions around harm reduction strategies.
{"title":"Comparing self-rated health among exclusive e-cigarette users and traditional cigarette smokers: an analysis of the Health Survey for England 2019.","authors":"Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Duaa Abdullah Bafail","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03817-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03817-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The health implications of e-cigarette use compared to traditional cigarette smoking continue to attract significant public health interest. This study examines self-rated health (SRH) outcomes among exclusive e-cigarette users versus exclusive traditional cigarette smokers, using data from the Health Survey for England 2019. From an initial sample of 10,299 participants, the study focused on 8204 adults, excluding those aged 0-15. Further refinement to exclusive nicotine product users led to 274 e-cigarette users and 1017 cigarette smokers, after excluding dual users, never users, ex-users, non-responders, and users of other tobacco products such as pipes and cigars. SRH was derived from participants' responses to a question asking how they rated their general health, with five possible options: \"very good\", \"good\", \"fair\", \"bad\", and \"very bad\". For the purposes of this study, these responses were collapsed into two categories: \"Good Health\" (combining \"very good\" and \"good\") and \"Poor Health\" (combining \"fair\", \"bad\", and \"very bad\"). Consequently, 834 participants were classified as reporting good health, while 457 reported poor health. Binary logistic regression, adjusted for factors such as age, sex, ethnicity, residence, education, body mass index, alcohol use, age started smoking, physical or mental health conditions, and frequency of GP visits, revealed that exclusive e-cigarette users were significantly more likely to report good health compared to exclusive cigarette smokers, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.10 - 2.32, p = 0.014). As a sensitivity analysis, a generalized ordered logistic regression model was performed using the original five SRH categories. The adjusted model confirmed consistent results, with exclusive e-cigarette users showing higher odds of reporting better health across the full range of SRH outcomes (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.08-1.82, p = 0.011). These findings suggest that exclusive e-cigarette users perceive their health more positively than traditional cigarette smokers, contributing useful insights to the discussions around harm reduction strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142638839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-11DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03795-1
Victor Hagenau, Mathilde G Mulvad, Jan B Valentin, Arne S R Jensen, Martin F Gude
To assess final diagnoses and mortality rates (30 day and 1 year) in patients treated with the inhaled bronchodilator salbutamol by ambulance personnel, and to establish its role as an identifier of moderate to severe respiratory distress in the prehospital phase of treatment. In a descriptive retrospective observational study, patients experiencing respiratory distress and treated with inhaled bronchodilators, specifically salbutamol, in the prehospital setting within the Central Denmark Region during 2018-2019 were included. The study included 6318 ambulance transports, comprising 3686 cases of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), 234 with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), 320 with heart disease (HD), 233 adults with asthma, 1674 with various other primary ICD-10 diagnoses (other ≥ 18 years), and 171 patients under 18 years. The 30 day mortality rate for all patients was 10.7% (95% CI 9.8-11.6), with zero deaths within 30 days among adults with asthma and those under 18. Excluding low mortality groups, AECOPD patients had the lowest 30 day mortality at 10.2% (95% CI 9.1-11.3), and HD patients the highest at 15.3% (95% CI 10.6-19.9). The 1-year overall mortality rate increased to 32.1% (95% CI 30.2-34.0), with mortality staying low for asthma and under-18 groups, while differences between other groups lessened and became insignificant. Patients requiring inhaled bronchodilator treatment in ambulances exhibit notably high mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year, except for those with asthma or under 18. The need for prehospital bronchodilators could serve as a clear and unmistakable marker for moderate to severe respiratory distress, enabling early intervention.
目的:评估救护人员使用吸入式支气管扩张剂沙丁胺醇治疗患者的最终诊断和死亡率(30 天和 1 年),并确定沙丁胺醇在院前治疗阶段作为中度至重度呼吸窘迫标识物的作用。在一项描述性回顾观察研究中,纳入了2018-2019年期间在丹麦中部地区院前环境中经历呼吸窘迫并接受吸入性支气管扩张剂(特别是沙丁胺醇)治疗的患者。研究共纳入 6318 次救护车转运,其中包括 3686 例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重患者、234 例社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者、320 例心脏病患者、233 例成人哮喘患者、1674 例各种其他 ICD-10 主要诊断(其他≥ 18 岁)患者和 171 例 18 岁以下患者。所有患者的 30 天死亡率为 10.7%(95% CI 9.8-11.6),其中哮喘成人患者和 18 岁以下患者 30 天内的死亡率为零。除去低死亡率群体,AECOPD 患者的 30 天死亡率最低,为 10.2% (95% CI 9.1-11.3),而 HD 患者的 30 天死亡率最高,为 15.3% (95% CI 10.6-19.9)。1年总死亡率上升至32.1%(95% CI 30.2-34.0),哮喘组和18岁以下组的死亡率保持在较低水平,而其他组之间的差异有所缩小,变得不明显。在救护车上需要吸入支气管扩张剂治疗的患者在30天和1年后的死亡率明显较高,但哮喘患者和18岁以下患者除外。需要使用院前支气管扩张剂可作为中度至重度呼吸窘迫的一个明确无误的标志,从而实现早期干预。
{"title":"Final diagnoses and mortality rates in ambulance patients administered nebulized β2-agonists bronchodilators.","authors":"Victor Hagenau, Mathilde G Mulvad, Jan B Valentin, Arne S R Jensen, Martin F Gude","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03795-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03795-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess final diagnoses and mortality rates (30 day and 1 year) in patients treated with the inhaled bronchodilator salbutamol by ambulance personnel, and to establish its role as an identifier of moderate to severe respiratory distress in the prehospital phase of treatment. In a descriptive retrospective observational study, patients experiencing respiratory distress and treated with inhaled bronchodilators, specifically salbutamol, in the prehospital setting within the Central Denmark Region during 2018-2019 were included. The study included 6318 ambulance transports, comprising 3686 cases of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), 234 with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), 320 with heart disease (HD), 233 adults with asthma, 1674 with various other primary ICD-10 diagnoses (other ≥ 18 years), and 171 patients under 18 years. The 30 day mortality rate for all patients was 10.7% (95% CI 9.8-11.6), with zero deaths within 30 days among adults with asthma and those under 18. Excluding low mortality groups, AECOPD patients had the lowest 30 day mortality at 10.2% (95% CI 9.1-11.3), and HD patients the highest at 15.3% (95% CI 10.6-19.9). The 1-year overall mortality rate increased to 32.1% (95% CI 30.2-34.0), with mortality staying low for asthma and under-18 groups, while differences between other groups lessened and became insignificant. Patients requiring inhaled bronchodilator treatment in ambulances exhibit notably high mortality rates at 30 days and 1 year, except for those with asthma or under 18. The need for prehospital bronchodilators could serve as a clear and unmistakable marker for moderate to severe respiratory distress, enabling early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-09DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03777-3
Yun Ge, Bingwei Wang, Jingyuan Liu, Ruoyan Han, Changpeng Liu
Acute respiratory failure is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission of cancer patients. Studies of the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy were rarely conducted in cancer populations. We here compared the clinical effects of HFNC therapy and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in cancer patients with concurrent acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). In this single-center retrospective study, cancer patients with concurrent acute hypoxic respiratory failure either received initial oxygen therapy via HFNC (HFNC group, 68 patients) or received initial oxygen therapy via a nasal cannula, simple mask, or mask with reservoir bag (COT group, 133 patients). Groups were propensity score matched. Differences in respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and PaO2/FiO2 ratio before and after treatment in the two groups were compared using a mixed-effects model. The 28-day mortality risk was explored using a Cox proportional hazards model. The 24-h and 48-h PaO2/FIO2 ratios were significantly higher in the HFNC than in the COT group (210.5 mmHg vs. 178.5 mmHg; P < 0.01; 217.1 mm Hg vs. 181.6 mm Hg; P < 0.01, respectively). Differences in RR and HR between the groups at each time point were nonsignificant. The 28-day mortality rate was 17.4% vs. 38.1% for the HFNC and COT groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Hazard ratio was significantly higher for COT group (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3, 5.3). Compared with COT, HFNC use for initial oxygen therapy can improve PaO2/FIO2 ratio and survival rate in cancer patients with AHRF.
{"title":"Efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in cancer patients with concurrent acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a retrospective propensity score study.","authors":"Yun Ge, Bingwei Wang, Jingyuan Liu, Ruoyan Han, Changpeng Liu","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03777-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03777-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute respiratory failure is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission of cancer patients. Studies of the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy were rarely conducted in cancer populations. We here compared the clinical effects of HFNC therapy and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in cancer patients with concurrent acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). In this single-center retrospective study, cancer patients with concurrent acute hypoxic respiratory failure either received initial oxygen therapy via HFNC (HFNC group, 68 patients) or received initial oxygen therapy via a nasal cannula, simple mask, or mask with reservoir bag (COT group, 133 patients). Groups were propensity score matched. Differences in respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio before and after treatment in the two groups were compared using a mixed-effects model. The 28-day mortality risk was explored using a Cox proportional hazards model. The 24-h and 48-h PaO<sub>2</sub>/FIO<sub>2</sub> ratios were significantly higher in the HFNC than in the COT group (210.5 mmHg vs. 178.5 mmHg; P < 0.01; 217.1 mm Hg vs. 181.6 mm Hg; P < 0.01, respectively). Differences in RR and HR between the groups at each time point were nonsignificant. The 28-day mortality rate was 17.4% vs. 38.1% for the HFNC and COT groups, respectively (P < 0.01). Hazard ratio was significantly higher for COT group (HR 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.3, 5.3). Compared with COT, HFNC use for initial oxygen therapy can improve PaO<sub>2</sub>/FIO<sub>2</sub> ratio and survival rate in cancer patients with AHRF.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Predicting COPD readmissions: a novel 2e index with traditional regression and machine-learning approaches.","authors":"Chiat Qiao Liew, Yen-Pin Chen, Jun-Wan Gao, Chia-Hsin Ko, Chu-Lin Tsai","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03816-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03816-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-08DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03742-0
Sang Hwan Lee, Yongil Cho, Jaehoon Oh, Hyunggoo Kang, Tae Ho Lim, Byuk Sung Ko, Kyung Hun Yoo, Juncheol Lee
Background: Assessing the neurologic outcomes of patients who experience out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is challenging. Neurologic outcomes were evaluated using initial nutrition related biochemical markers.
Methods: We used data from a multicentre retrospective observational study, the Korean Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Consortium (KoCARC) registry. Among the 666 patients, 217 had good neurologic outcomes, while 449 had poor neurologic outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were employed.
Result: In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, total cholesterol ≥ 158.5 mg/dL, total bilirubin ≥ 0.265 mg/dL, Sodium < 142.1 mEq/L, AST < 200.5 U/L and were identified as significant biomarkers for good neurologic outcomes. In the CART analysis, total cholesterol ≥ 158.5 mg/dL and total bilirubin ≥ 0.365 mg/dL were found to be significant indicators. In additional analysis, when the total bilirubin level ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 mg/dL, the highest rate of a good neurologic outcome was observed at 44.6%, whereas levels below or above this range gradually indicated a lower rate of a good neurologic outcome.
Conclusion: We propose that total cholesterol and total bilirubin levels could serve as valuable indicators for predicting neurologic outcomes in patients with OHCA.
{"title":"Total cholesterol and bilirubin levels are associated with neurologic outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.","authors":"Sang Hwan Lee, Yongil Cho, Jaehoon Oh, Hyunggoo Kang, Tae Ho Lim, Byuk Sung Ko, Kyung Hun Yoo, Juncheol Lee","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03742-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03742-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assessing the neurologic outcomes of patients who experience out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is challenging. Neurologic outcomes were evaluated using initial nutrition related biochemical markers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a multicentre retrospective observational study, the Korean Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Consortium (KoCARC) registry. Among the 666 patients, 217 had good neurologic outcomes, while 449 had poor neurologic outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were employed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, total cholesterol ≥ 158.5 mg/dL, total bilirubin ≥ 0.265 mg/dL, Sodium < 142.1 mEq/L, AST < 200.5 U/L and were identified as significant biomarkers for good neurologic outcomes. In the CART analysis, total cholesterol ≥ 158.5 mg/dL and total bilirubin ≥ 0.365 mg/dL were found to be significant indicators. In additional analysis, when the total bilirubin level ranged from 0.6 to 0.7 mg/dL, the highest rate of a good neurologic outcome was observed at 44.6%, whereas levels below or above this range gradually indicated a lower rate of a good neurologic outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We propose that total cholesterol and total bilirubin levels could serve as valuable indicators for predicting neurologic outcomes in patients with OHCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142619752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}