Challenges with two epidural catheters for labor analgesia in a patient with lumbar adhesions: a case report.

Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1186/s40981-024-00724-1
Yuki Hosokawa, Rie Kato, Eriko Ohsugi, Michiko Sugita
{"title":"Challenges with two epidural catheters for labor analgesia in a patient with lumbar adhesions: a case report.","authors":"Yuki Hosokawa, Rie Kato, Eriko Ohsugi, Michiko Sugita","doi":"10.1186/s40981-024-00724-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of neuraxial analgesia varies with spinal canal pathology. Notably, a secondary epidural catheter has been shown to increase neuraxial labor analgesia in women with spinal lesions. Therefore, we present a case in which catheter withdrawal played a critical role in achieving effective labor analgesia in a woman with epidural adhesions after lumbar discectomy who had inadequate analgesia with two epidural catheters.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>We encountered a patient with L5 lumbar epidural adhesions who reported pain even after receiving two epidural catheters. The catheters were placed in the L1/2 and L5/S intervertebral spaces. Analgesic effects were exerted when the L5/S catheter was withdrawn by 1 cm, suggesting that the catheter tip was initially placed inside the adhesion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Careful consideration of catheter placement and adjustments by withdrawing the catheter are crucial in managing labor analgesia in patients with known epidural adhesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189360/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-024-00724-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of neuraxial analgesia varies with spinal canal pathology. Notably, a secondary epidural catheter has been shown to increase neuraxial labor analgesia in women with spinal lesions. Therefore, we present a case in which catheter withdrawal played a critical role in achieving effective labor analgesia in a woman with epidural adhesions after lumbar discectomy who had inadequate analgesia with two epidural catheters.

Case presentation: We encountered a patient with L5 lumbar epidural adhesions who reported pain even after receiving two epidural catheters. The catheters were placed in the L1/2 and L5/S intervertebral spaces. Analgesic effects were exerted when the L5/S catheter was withdrawn by 1 cm, suggesting that the catheter tip was initially placed inside the adhesion.

Conclusions: Careful consideration of catheter placement and adjustments by withdrawing the catheter are crucial in managing labor analgesia in patients with known epidural adhesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
腰椎粘连患者使用两种硬膜外导管分娩镇痛的挑战:病例报告。
背景:神经镇痛的效果因椎管病变而异。值得注意的是,在脊柱病变的产妇中,二次硬膜外导管已被证明可增加神经镇痛的效果。因此,我们介绍了一例腰椎间盘切除术后硬膜外粘连的产妇,在使用两根硬膜外导管镇痛不足的情况下,导管撤出在实现有效分娩镇痛方面发挥了关键作用:我们遇到了一名腰椎间盘切除术后硬膜外粘连的患者,她在使用了两根硬膜外导管后仍报告疼痛。导管分别置入 L1/2 和 L5/S 椎间隙。当将 L5/S 导管抽出 1 厘米时,镇痛效果显现,这表明导管尖端最初位于粘连处内部:结论:在管理已知硬膜外粘连患者的分娩镇痛时,仔细考虑导管放置位置并通过抽出导管进行调整至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1