Power and place: Uncovering the politics of global medical education.

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1111/medu.15459
Mohammed Ahmed Rashid, Janet Grant
{"title":"Power and place: Uncovering the politics of global medical education.","authors":"Mohammed Ahmed Rashid, Janet Grant","doi":"10.1111/medu.15459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Politics is characterised by power relations, and the deployment of power is inescapably political. In an increasingly globalised and interconnected modern world, politics is shaping the field of medical education more than ever before. Global frameworks that classify peoples and places are political tools that are fundamentally shaped by hegemonic knowledge systems. Despite this, they continue to form the basis for global thinking and practices, including in medical education. Political analysis can help to expose and challenge such thinking.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>To better understand impacts of globalisation in medical education, we explore the previously under-examined political dimensions that underpin it, focusing particularly on deconstructing power relations. We situate our analysis of global medical education in political terms, including through examination of ideology, economics, market and the enduring effects of colonialism. We interrogate the construct of the Global South (GS), considering the geopolitical and historical ideas that have enabled it to be widely propagated. We go on to examine the consequences of the GS construct in medical education and consider what this tells us about how power is enacted in the field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In analysing the politics of global medical education, we shed light on how power is exerted and draw attention to forces that permit and enable trends, policies and positions. Notwithstanding the emancipatory rhetoric that has been associated with the GS construct, we highlight its reductive potential and argue that it can lead to an oversimplification of power relations and vested interests. Given the growing recognition that educational approaches do not transfer well across countries and cultures, we encourage the medical education community to consider why ideas from more dominant countries continue to be imitated so routinely. In doing so, we urge them to use political lenses to recognise the influence of multiple complex and interconnected forces of global power that shape all aspects of medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15459","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Politics is characterised by power relations, and the deployment of power is inescapably political. In an increasingly globalised and interconnected modern world, politics is shaping the field of medical education more than ever before. Global frameworks that classify peoples and places are political tools that are fundamentally shaped by hegemonic knowledge systems. Despite this, they continue to form the basis for global thinking and practices, including in medical education. Political analysis can help to expose and challenge such thinking.

Approach: To better understand impacts of globalisation in medical education, we explore the previously under-examined political dimensions that underpin it, focusing particularly on deconstructing power relations. We situate our analysis of global medical education in political terms, including through examination of ideology, economics, market and the enduring effects of colonialism. We interrogate the construct of the Global South (GS), considering the geopolitical and historical ideas that have enabled it to be widely propagated. We go on to examine the consequences of the GS construct in medical education and consider what this tells us about how power is enacted in the field.

Conclusions: In analysing the politics of global medical education, we shed light on how power is exerted and draw attention to forces that permit and enable trends, policies and positions. Notwithstanding the emancipatory rhetoric that has been associated with the GS construct, we highlight its reductive potential and argue that it can lead to an oversimplification of power relations and vested interests. Given the growing recognition that educational approaches do not transfer well across countries and cultures, we encourage the medical education community to consider why ideas from more dominant countries continue to be imitated so routinely. In doing so, we urge them to use political lenses to recognise the influence of multiple complex and interconnected forces of global power that shape all aspects of medical education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力与地方:揭开全球医学教育的政治面纱。
背景:政治的特点是权力关系,而权力的运用不可避免地具有政治性。在日益全球化和相互关联的现代世界中,政治比以往任何时候都更能影响医学教育领域。对民族和地方进行分类的全球框架是政治工具,从根本上说是由霸权知识体系塑造的。尽管如此,它们仍然是全球思维和实践的基础,包括在医学教育中。政治分析有助于揭露和挑战这种思维:为了更好地理解全球化对医学教育的影响,我们探讨了之前未得到充分研究的政治层面,特别是解构权力关系。我们从政治角度分析全球医学教育,包括研究意识形态、经济、市场和殖民主义的持久影响。我们审视了全球南方(GS)的概念,考虑了使其得以广泛传播的地缘政治和历史观念。我们接着考察了全球南方结构在医学教育中的后果,并思考了这对我们如何在该领域行使权力的启示:在分析全球医学教育政治时,我们揭示了权力是如何行使的,并提请注意那些允许和促成趋势、政策和立场的力量。尽管 "全球战略 "的概念具有解放性,但我们强调了它的还原潜力,并认为它可能导致权力关系和既得利益的过度简单化。鉴于越来越多的人认识到教育方法并不能很好地在不同国家和文化间传递,我们鼓励医学教育界思考为什么来自更占主导地位的国家的理念仍然被如此频繁地模仿。在此过程中,我们敦促他们使用政治视角,认识到影响医学教育各个方面的多种复杂而相互关联的全球权力力量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
Why we should stop writing commentaries about AI. Employing reflective practice to enhance student engagement. A scoping review and theory-informed conceptual model of professional identity formation in medical education: Commentary from a clinical psychology perspective. Laying train tracks en route: How institutional education leaders navigate complexity during mandated curriculum change. Feedback, learning and becoming: Narratives of feedback in complex performance challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1