The Use of a Just Noticeable Difference Approach to Improve Perceptual Acuity Ability in Male Runners.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1177/00315125241252852
Maressa Priscila Krause, Luke Haile, Dayanne Sampaio Antonio, Andre L Peres, Robert J Robertson
{"title":"The Use of a <i>Just Noticeable Difference</i> Approach to Improve Perceptual Acuity Ability in Male Runners.","authors":"Maressa Priscila Krause, Luke Haile, Dayanne Sampaio Antonio, Andre L Peres, Robert J Robertson","doi":"10.1177/00315125241252852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We were interested in micro-variations in an athlete's psychophysical state that separate peak exertion from physiological collapse. Thus, we measured perceptual acuity in runners using a classic psychophysical approach, the <i>just noticeable difference</i> (JND) on two standard stimuli runs at treadmill speed corresponding to 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> and 80%VO<sub>2max</sub>. Thirty-four male runners (<i>M</i> age = 35.26, <i>SD</i> = 7.33 years) first performed a maximal treadmill test to determine the speed of a standard exercise bout for the JND trials. The JND trials consisted of four 5-minute running bouts on a treadmill with 5-minute rests between bouts. For bouts 1 and 3, participants ran at the standard stimuli pace, but for bouts 2 and 4, they adjusted their speeds to achieve a level of exertion at a JND above/below the SS. They achieved differences in the final 30 seconds of the VO<sub>2</sub> between each JND bout and the previous standard stimuli at just above (JND-A) and just below (JND-B) the JND perceived exertions. We used a Generalized Linear Model analysis to compare the JND-A and JND-B within and between ventilatory threshold groups (lower/higher) in absolute and relative VO<sub>2</sub> and in terms of the total JND magnitude. The magnitude of JND-A was greater than that of JND-B at 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> and 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> in absolute units (70%VO<sub>2</sub> Δ = 2.62; <i>SE</i> = 0.37; <i>p</i> < .001; 80%VO<sub>2</sub> Δ = 1.67; <i>SE</i> = 0.44; <i>p</i> = .002) and in relative units (70%VO<sub>2max</sub> Δ = 4.70; <i>SE</i> = 0.66; <i>p</i> < .001; 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> Δ = 2.96; <i>SE</i> = 0.80; <i>p</i> = .002). The total magnitude was greater in the 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> trial than 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> in absolute units (70%VO<sub>2</sub> <i>M</i> = 3.78, <i>SE</i> = 0.31 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>; 80%VO<sub>2</sub> <i>M =</i> 2.62, <i>SE</i> = 0.37 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p =</i> .020) and in relative units (70%VO<sub>2max</sub> <i>M =</i> 6.57, <i>SE</i> = 0.53%VO<sub>2max</sub>; 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> <i>M =</i> 4.71, <i>SE</i> = 0.64%VO<sub>2max</sub>; <i>p =</i> .030). The JND range narrowed when physiologic demand increased, for both physical (speed) and psychological (RPE) variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"1341-1359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241252852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We were interested in micro-variations in an athlete's psychophysical state that separate peak exertion from physiological collapse. Thus, we measured perceptual acuity in runners using a classic psychophysical approach, the just noticeable difference (JND) on two standard stimuli runs at treadmill speed corresponding to 70%VO2max and 80%VO2max. Thirty-four male runners (M age = 35.26, SD = 7.33 years) first performed a maximal treadmill test to determine the speed of a standard exercise bout for the JND trials. The JND trials consisted of four 5-minute running bouts on a treadmill with 5-minute rests between bouts. For bouts 1 and 3, participants ran at the standard stimuli pace, but for bouts 2 and 4, they adjusted their speeds to achieve a level of exertion at a JND above/below the SS. They achieved differences in the final 30 seconds of the VO2 between each JND bout and the previous standard stimuli at just above (JND-A) and just below (JND-B) the JND perceived exertions. We used a Generalized Linear Model analysis to compare the JND-A and JND-B within and between ventilatory threshold groups (lower/higher) in absolute and relative VO2 and in terms of the total JND magnitude. The magnitude of JND-A was greater than that of JND-B at 70%VO2max and 80%VO2max in absolute units (70%VO2 Δ = 2.62; SE = 0.37; p < .001; 80%VO2 Δ = 1.67; SE = 0.44; p = .002) and in relative units (70%VO2max Δ = 4.70; SE = 0.66; p < .001; 80%VO2max Δ = 2.96; SE = 0.80; p = .002). The total magnitude was greater in the 70%VO2max trial than 80%VO2max in absolute units (70%VO2 M = 3.78, SE = 0.31 mL·kg-1·min-1; 80%VO2 M = 2.62, SE = 0.37 mL·kg-1·min-1; p = .020) and in relative units (70%VO2max M = 6.57, SE = 0.53%VO2max; 80%VO2max M = 4.71, SE = 0.64%VO2max; p = .030). The JND range narrowed when physiologic demand increased, for both physical (speed) and psychological (RPE) variables.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 "明显差异法 "提高男性跑步者的感知敏锐度。
我们对运动员心理物理状态的微观变化很感兴趣,这种微观变化是峰值消耗和生理崩溃之间的分水岭。因此,我们使用一种经典的心理物理方法测量了跑步者的知觉敏锐度,即在跑步机上以 70%VO2max 和 80%VO2max 的速度进行两次标准刺激跑时的刚注意到的差异 (JND)。34 名男性跑步者(平均年龄 35.26 岁,平均年龄 7.33 岁)首先进行了最大跑步机测试,以确定 JND 试验的标准运动速度。JND 试验包括在跑步机上进行四次 5 分钟的跑步,每次跑步之间休息 5 分钟。在第 1 次和第 3 次试验中,参与者以标准刺激速度跑步,但在第 2 次和第 4 次试验中,他们调整了速度,以达到高于/低于 SS 的 JND 运动强度。他们在最后 30 秒的 VO2 值上实现了每场 JND 与前一场标准刺激之间的差异,即略高于(JND-A)和略低于(JND-B)JND 感知消耗量。我们使用广义线性模型分析法比较了通气阈值组(较低/较高)内和组间的 JND-A 和 JND-B 的绝对和相对 VO2 以及总 JND 幅值。在绝对单位(70%VO2 Δ = 2.62;SE = 0.37;p < .001;80%VO2 Δ = 1.67;SE = 0.44;p = .002)和相对单位(70%VO2max Δ = 4.70;SE = 0.66;p < .001;80%VO2max Δ = 2.96;SE = 0.80;p = .002)上,70%VO2max 和 80%VO2max 时的 JND-A 幅值大于 JND-B 幅值。就绝对单位(70%VO2 M = 3.78,SE = 0.31 mL-kg-1-min-1;80%VO2 M = 2.62,SE = 0.37 mL-kg-1-min-1;p = .020)和相对单位(70%VO2max M = 6.57,SE = 0.53%VO2max;80%VO2max M = 4.71,SE = 0.64%VO2max;p = .030)而言,70%VO2max 试验的总幅度大于 80%VO2max。当生理需求增加时,JND 范围缩小,生理(速度)和心理(RPE)变量均是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Fundamental Motor Skill Domains and Physical Fitness Components in 5-11-Year-Old Children. Immediate Effects of Custom Foot Orthoses on Postural Balance and Pain in Obese Middle-Aged Women With Plantar Fasciitis. Reliability and Validity of the Trunk Control Measurement Scale in Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Magnitude and Direction of Interlimb Asymmetry and the Association of Interlimb Asymmetry with Physical Performance in Judo Athletes with Visual Impairment. The Effects of Telerehabilitation-Based Exercise Therapy on Motor and Non-Motor Clinical Outcomes in Adults With Facial Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1