Maressa Priscila Krause, Luke Haile, Dayanne Sampaio Antonio, Andre L Peres, Robert J Robertson
{"title":"The Use of a <i>Just Noticeable Difference</i> Approach to Improve Perceptual Acuity Ability in Male Runners.","authors":"Maressa Priscila Krause, Luke Haile, Dayanne Sampaio Antonio, Andre L Peres, Robert J Robertson","doi":"10.1177/00315125241252852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We were interested in micro-variations in an athlete's psychophysical state that separate peak exertion from physiological collapse. Thus, we measured perceptual acuity in runners using a classic psychophysical approach, the <i>just noticeable difference</i> (JND) on two standard stimuli runs at treadmill speed corresponding to 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> and 80%VO<sub>2max</sub>. Thirty-four male runners (<i>M</i> age = 35.26, <i>SD</i> = 7.33 years) first performed a maximal treadmill test to determine the speed of a standard exercise bout for the JND trials. The JND trials consisted of four 5-minute running bouts on a treadmill with 5-minute rests between bouts. For bouts 1 and 3, participants ran at the standard stimuli pace, but for bouts 2 and 4, they adjusted their speeds to achieve a level of exertion at a JND above/below the SS. They achieved differences in the final 30 seconds of the VO<sub>2</sub> between each JND bout and the previous standard stimuli at just above (JND-A) and just below (JND-B) the JND perceived exertions. We used a Generalized Linear Model analysis to compare the JND-A and JND-B within and between ventilatory threshold groups (lower/higher) in absolute and relative VO<sub>2</sub> and in terms of the total JND magnitude. The magnitude of JND-A was greater than that of JND-B at 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> and 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> in absolute units (70%VO<sub>2</sub> Δ = 2.62; <i>SE</i> = 0.37; <i>p</i> < .001; 80%VO<sub>2</sub> Δ = 1.67; <i>SE</i> = 0.44; <i>p</i> = .002) and in relative units (70%VO<sub>2max</sub> Δ = 4.70; <i>SE</i> = 0.66; <i>p</i> < .001; 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> Δ = 2.96; <i>SE</i> = 0.80; <i>p</i> = .002). The total magnitude was greater in the 70%VO<sub>2max</sub> trial than 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> in absolute units (70%VO<sub>2</sub> <i>M</i> = 3.78, <i>SE</i> = 0.31 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>; 80%VO<sub>2</sub> <i>M =</i> 2.62, <i>SE</i> = 0.37 mL·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>; <i>p =</i> .020) and in relative units (70%VO<sub>2max</sub> <i>M =</i> 6.57, <i>SE</i> = 0.53%VO<sub>2max</sub>; 80%VO<sub>2max</sub> <i>M =</i> 4.71, <i>SE</i> = 0.64%VO<sub>2max</sub>; <i>p =</i> .030). The JND range narrowed when physiologic demand increased, for both physical (speed) and psychological (RPE) variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"1341-1359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241252852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We were interested in micro-variations in an athlete's psychophysical state that separate peak exertion from physiological collapse. Thus, we measured perceptual acuity in runners using a classic psychophysical approach, the just noticeable difference (JND) on two standard stimuli runs at treadmill speed corresponding to 70%VO2max and 80%VO2max. Thirty-four male runners (M age = 35.26, SD = 7.33 years) first performed a maximal treadmill test to determine the speed of a standard exercise bout for the JND trials. The JND trials consisted of four 5-minute running bouts on a treadmill with 5-minute rests between bouts. For bouts 1 and 3, participants ran at the standard stimuli pace, but for bouts 2 and 4, they adjusted their speeds to achieve a level of exertion at a JND above/below the SS. They achieved differences in the final 30 seconds of the VO2 between each JND bout and the previous standard stimuli at just above (JND-A) and just below (JND-B) the JND perceived exertions. We used a Generalized Linear Model analysis to compare the JND-A and JND-B within and between ventilatory threshold groups (lower/higher) in absolute and relative VO2 and in terms of the total JND magnitude. The magnitude of JND-A was greater than that of JND-B at 70%VO2max and 80%VO2max in absolute units (70%VO2 Δ = 2.62; SE = 0.37; p < .001; 80%VO2 Δ = 1.67; SE = 0.44; p = .002) and in relative units (70%VO2max Δ = 4.70; SE = 0.66; p < .001; 80%VO2max Δ = 2.96; SE = 0.80; p = .002). The total magnitude was greater in the 70%VO2max trial than 80%VO2max in absolute units (70%VO2M = 3.78, SE = 0.31 mL·kg-1·min-1; 80%VO2M = 2.62, SE = 0.37 mL·kg-1·min-1; p = .020) and in relative units (70%VO2maxM = 6.57, SE = 0.53%VO2max; 80%VO2maxM = 4.71, SE = 0.64%VO2max; p = .030). The JND range narrowed when physiologic demand increased, for both physical (speed) and psychological (RPE) variables.