Objectively quantifying subjective phenomena: Measuring the flashed face distortion effect

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105861
Yi Gao , Minzhi Wang , Dobromir Rahnev
{"title":"Objectively quantifying subjective phenomena: Measuring the flashed face distortion effect","authors":"Yi Gao ,&nbsp;Minzhi Wang ,&nbsp;Dobromir Rahnev","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Objectively quantifying subjective phenomena like visual illusions is challenging. We address this issue in the context of the Flashed Face Distortion Effect (FFDE), where faces presented in succession appear distorted and grotesque. We first show that the traditional method of quantifying FFDE – via subjective ratings of the level of distortion – is subject to substantial biases. Motivated by this finding, we develop an objective method for quantifying FFDE by introducing two design innovations. First, we create artificially distorted faces and ask subjects to discriminate between undistorted and objectively distorted faces. Second, we employ both an illusion condition, which includes a succession of 15 face flashes, and a control condition, which includes a single face flash and does not induce an illusion. Using these innovations, we quantify the strength of the face distortion illusion by comparing the response bias for identifying distorted faces between the illusion and control conditions. We find that our method successfully quantifies the face distortion, with subjects exhibiting a more liberal response bias in the illusion condition. Finally, we apply our new method to evaluate how the face distortion illusion is modulated by face eccentricity, face inversion, the temporal frequency of the face flashes, and presence of temporal gaps between consecutive faces. Our results demonstrate the utility of our objective method in quantifying the subjective illusion of face distortion. Critically, the method is general and can be applied to other phenomena that are inherently subjective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectively quantifying subjective phenomena like visual illusions is challenging. We address this issue in the context of the Flashed Face Distortion Effect (FFDE), where faces presented in succession appear distorted and grotesque. We first show that the traditional method of quantifying FFDE – via subjective ratings of the level of distortion – is subject to substantial biases. Motivated by this finding, we develop an objective method for quantifying FFDE by introducing two design innovations. First, we create artificially distorted faces and ask subjects to discriminate between undistorted and objectively distorted faces. Second, we employ both an illusion condition, which includes a succession of 15 face flashes, and a control condition, which includes a single face flash and does not induce an illusion. Using these innovations, we quantify the strength of the face distortion illusion by comparing the response bias for identifying distorted faces between the illusion and control conditions. We find that our method successfully quantifies the face distortion, with subjects exhibiting a more liberal response bias in the illusion condition. Finally, we apply our new method to evaluate how the face distortion illusion is modulated by face eccentricity, face inversion, the temporal frequency of the face flashes, and presence of temporal gaps between consecutive faces. Our results demonstrate the utility of our objective method in quantifying the subjective illusion of face distortion. Critically, the method is general and can be applied to other phenomena that are inherently subjective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
客观量化主观现象:测量闪烁脸部失真效应
客观量化视错觉等主观现象具有挑战性。我们以 "闪烁人脸失真效应"(FFDE)为背景探讨了这一问题,在这种效应中,连续呈现的人脸会出现扭曲和怪异。我们首先证明,量化 FFDE 的传统方法--通过对失真程度的主观评价--存在很大的偏差。受这一发现的启发,我们通过引入两项设计创新,开发出一种量化 FFDE 的客观方法。首先,我们制作了人为扭曲的人脸,并要求受试者区分未扭曲和客观扭曲的人脸。其次,我们同时采用了幻觉条件和对照条件,前者包括连续 15 次人脸闪烁,后者包括单次人脸闪烁且不诱发幻觉。利用这些创新,我们通过比较幻觉条件和对照条件下识别扭曲人脸的反应偏差,来量化人脸扭曲幻觉的强度。我们发现,我们的方法成功地量化了人脸失真,受试者在幻觉条件下表现出更宽松的反应偏差。最后,我们运用新方法评估了人脸失真幻觉如何受到人脸偏心率、人脸反转、人脸闪烁的时间频率以及连续人脸之间是否存在时间间隙的影响。我们的结果表明,我们的客观方法可以量化人脸失真的主观错觉。重要的是,该方法具有通用性,可应用于其他固有的主观现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models. Readers encode absolute letter positions The primacy of taxonomic semantic organization over thematic semantic organization during picture naming Do early meanings of negation map onto a fully-fledged negation concept in infancy? Speech-to-song transformation in perception and production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1