首页 > 最新文献

Cognition最新文献

英文 中文
Delaying reward feedback does not increase the influence of information on attentional priority in visual search 延迟奖励反馈不会增加视觉搜索中信息对注意优先级的影响
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106447
Julie Y.L. Chow , Kelly G. Garner , Daniel Pearson , Jan Theeuwes , Mike E. Le Pelley
Demonstrations of information-seeking behaviour suggest that attention often acts in an exploitative way, prioritising stimuli that provide diagnostic information about upcoming events over stimuli associated with uncertainty. However, recent evidence from studies of attentional capture in visual search show an opposite pattern: automatic prioritisation of items associated with reward uncertainty over diagnostic stimuli. We hypothesise that this uncertainty-modulated attentional capture (UMAC) effect reflects ‘attention for learning’: that is, exploration of potential sources of new information. Here we investigated whether UMAC arises because immediate provision of reward feedback in prior studies rendered advance information redundant, attenuating exploitation of diagnostic items and promoting exploration. Accordingly, increasing the duration of anticipated uncertainty (and hence the value of advance information that allows us to escape uncertainty earlier) should promote prioritisation of diagnostic cues and lead to patterns of attentional exploitation. In two eye-tracking experiments, we compared attentional capture by a cue providing diagnostic reward information and a cue signalling uncertain reward, while manipulating the delay between response and feedback (i.e., the duration of anticipated uncertainty that advance information could forestall). We found a UMAC effect in all conditions: regardless of response–feedback delay, uncertain stimuli were more likely to capture attention than diagnostic stimuli. These results suggest that prioritisation of uncertainty is a robust pattern of behaviour in this task. Synthesising current and previous findings, we suggest that different modes of attentional information-seeking may reflect qualitative task differences, with exploration operating at an implicit, automatic level, and exploitation resulting from top-down, volitional processes.
信息寻求行为的表现表明,注意力往往以一种剥削性的方式发挥作用,优先考虑提供有关即将发生事件的诊断信息的刺激,而不是与不确定性相关的刺激。然而,最近来自视觉搜索中注意力捕获的研究证据显示了相反的模式:与奖励不确定性相关的项目自动优先于诊断刺激。我们假设这种不确定性调节的注意力捕获(UMAC)效应反映了“学习的注意力”:即探索新信息的潜在来源。在这里,我们调查了UMAC的产生是否因为在先前的研究中,即时提供奖励反馈使预先信息冗余,减少了对诊断项目的利用并促进了探索。因此,增加预期不确定性的持续时间(因此,提前信息的价值使我们能够更早地逃避不确定性)应该促进诊断线索的优先级,并导致注意力开发的模式。在两个眼球追踪实验中,我们比较了提供诊断性奖励信息的线索和发出不确定奖励信号的线索的注意力捕获,同时操纵了反应和反馈之间的延迟(即预先信息可以预先阻止的预期不确定性的持续时间)。我们发现在所有条件下都存在UMAC效应:无论反应反馈延迟如何,不确定刺激比诊断刺激更容易引起注意。这些结果表明,在这项任务中,不确定性的优先级是一种强大的行为模式。综合目前和以前的研究结果,我们认为不同的注意信息寻求模式可能反映了定性任务的差异,其中探索是在隐性的、自动的水平上进行的,而利用是自上而下的、意志的过程。
{"title":"Delaying reward feedback does not increase the influence of information on attentional priority in visual search","authors":"Julie Y.L. Chow ,&nbsp;Kelly G. Garner ,&nbsp;Daniel Pearson ,&nbsp;Jan Theeuwes ,&nbsp;Mike E. Le Pelley","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106447","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106447","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Demonstrations of information-seeking behaviour suggest that attention often acts in an exploitative way, prioritising stimuli that provide diagnostic information about upcoming events over stimuli associated with uncertainty. However, recent evidence from studies of attentional capture in visual search show an opposite pattern: automatic prioritisation of items associated with reward uncertainty over diagnostic stimuli. We hypothesise that this uncertainty-modulated attentional capture (UMAC) effect reflects ‘attention for learning’: that is, exploration of potential sources of new information. Here we investigated whether UMAC arises because immediate provision of reward feedback in prior studies rendered advance information redundant, attenuating exploitation of diagnostic items and promoting exploration. Accordingly, increasing the duration of anticipated uncertainty (and hence the value of advance information that allows us to escape uncertainty earlier) should promote prioritisation of diagnostic cues and lead to patterns of attentional exploitation. In two eye-tracking experiments, we compared attentional capture by a cue providing diagnostic reward information and a cue signalling uncertain reward, while manipulating the delay between response and feedback (i.e., the duration of anticipated uncertainty that advance information could forestall). We found a UMAC effect in all conditions: regardless of response–feedback delay, uncertain stimuli were more likely to capture attention than diagnostic stimuli. These results suggest that prioritisation of uncertainty is a robust pattern of behaviour in this task. Synthesising current and previous findings, we suggest that different modes of attentional information-seeking may reflect qualitative task differences, with exploration operating at an implicit, automatic level, and exploitation resulting from top-down, volitional processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979906","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidence for top-down constraints and form-based prediction in 4–5 year-olds' lexical processing 4-5岁儿童词汇加工中自上而下约束和基于形式预测的证据
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106445
Margaret Kandel , Nan Li , Jesse Snedeker
Interactive processing is a central feature of human cognition, whereby top-down and bottom-up pathways pass information between different levels of representation. In this study, we investigated how these interactive mechanisms develop by asking whether interactive processing arises early in life or emerges later, with experience or as the brain matures. In a visual world eye-tracking study, we tested whether four and five year-old children show evidence of top-down interactivity during language comprehension. We found that young children, like adults, can use top-down cues from the sentence context to constrain processing of the bottom-up language input during spoken word recognition, allowing them to avoid activating word candidates that initially match the input but are semantically incongruent with the context. Furthermore, we found that the children used top-down cues to pre-activate the phonological representations of predictable words before they appeared in the input. These findings illustrate that the pathways necessary for interactive processing are robust and active by early childhood, suggesting that the mechanisms of interactive processing are intrinsic and fundamental properties of the mind's architecture.
交互处理是人类认知的核心特征,自上而下和自下而上的途径在不同层次的表征之间传递信息。在这项研究中,我们调查了这些互动机制是如何发展的,通过询问互动处理是在生命早期出现还是随着经验或大脑成熟而出现。在一项视觉世界眼球追踪研究中,我们测试了四岁和五岁的儿童在语言理解过程中是否表现出自上而下的交互性。我们发现,在口语单词识别过程中,幼儿和成人一样,可以使用自上而下的句子上下文线索来限制自下而上的语言输入的处理,从而避免激活最初与输入匹配但语义上与上下文不一致的候选词。此外,我们发现孩子们使用自上而下的线索在可预测的单词出现在输入之前就预先激活了它们的语音表征。这些发现表明,互动处理的必要途径在儿童早期就已经非常活跃,这表明互动处理的机制是心智结构的内在和基本属性。
{"title":"Evidence for top-down constraints and form-based prediction in 4–5 year-olds' lexical processing","authors":"Margaret Kandel ,&nbsp;Nan Li ,&nbsp;Jesse Snedeker","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106445","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106445","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interactive processing is a central feature of human cognition, whereby top-down and bottom-up pathways pass information between different levels of representation. In this study, we investigated how these interactive mechanisms develop by asking whether interactive processing arises early in life or emerges later, with experience or as the brain matures. In a visual world eye-tracking study, we tested whether four and five year-old children show evidence of top-down interactivity during language comprehension. We found that young children, like adults, can use top-down cues from the sentence context to constrain processing of the bottom-up language input during spoken word recognition, allowing them to avoid activating word candidates that initially match the input but are semantically incongruent with the context. Furthermore, we found that the children used top-down cues to pre-activate the phonological representations of predictable words before they appeared in the input. These findings illustrate that the pathways necessary for interactive processing are robust and active by early childhood, suggesting that the mechanisms of interactive processing are intrinsic and fundamental properties of the mind's architecture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Finding our ROLE: How and why to reframe essentialist approaches to language 寻找我们的角色:如何以及为什么重新构建语言的本质主义方法
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106444
Savithry Namboodiripad , Ethan Kutlu , Anna Babel , Molly Babel , Melissa Baese-Berk , Paras B. Bassuk , Adeli Block , Reinaldo Cabrera Pérez , Matthew T. Carlson , Sita Carraturo , Andrew Cheng , Lauretta S.P. Cheng , Philip Combiths , Ruthe Foushee , Anne Therese Frederiksen , Devin Grammon , Rachel Hayes-Harb , Eve Higby , Kelly Kendro , Elena Koulidobrova , Kelly Elizabeth Wright
Essentialist categorizations of language users, such as native speaker, are widely used but lack empirical validity and reinforce social inequities. This article focuses on the nativeness construct, critically examining how its centrality in social-scientific research distorts scholarly inquiry, introduces bias in educational and clinical assessments, and perpetuates exclusion in academia. We argue that such labels impose artificial homogeneity, devalue linguistic diversity, and contribute to systemic biases in society. By reifying social divisions, essentialist categorizations can exclude marginalized groups, perpetuate linguistic discrimination, and hinder scientific progress. We advocate for a shift away from essentialist proxies and toward more contextually grounded and empirically driven characterizations of language use. A reflexive and interdisciplinary approach is necessary to dismantle these harmful frameworks and promote more accurate, inclusive, and equitable research. Our argument is relevant not just to the cognitive sciences, but to any scholarship which involves describing or understanding language. Ultimately, rejecting essentialist assumptions will lead to more nuanced understandings of language, identity, and social belonging, fostering both scientific and societal transformation by promoting justice and accuracy across social-scientific disciplines.
语言使用者的本质主义分类被广泛使用,但缺乏经验有效性,并加剧了社会不平等。本文重点关注本土建构,批判性地审视其在社会科学研究中的中心地位如何扭曲学术探究,在教育和临床评估中引入偏见,并使学术界的排斥永久化。我们认为这样的标签强加了人为的同质性,贬低了语言多样性,并导致了社会中的系统性偏见。通过物化社会划分,本质主义分类可以排除边缘群体,使语言歧视永久化,并阻碍科学进步。我们提倡从本质主义的代理转向更基于上下文和经验驱动的语言使用特征。要拆除这些有害的框架,促进更准确、更包容、更公平的研究,需要一种反思和跨学科的方法。我们的论点不仅适用于认知科学,也适用于任何涉及描述或理解语言的学术研究。最终,拒绝本质主义假设将导致对语言、身份和社会归属的更细致的理解,通过促进社会科学学科的公正和准确性来促进科学和社会转型。
{"title":"Finding our ROLE: How and why to reframe essentialist approaches to language","authors":"Savithry Namboodiripad ,&nbsp;Ethan Kutlu ,&nbsp;Anna Babel ,&nbsp;Molly Babel ,&nbsp;Melissa Baese-Berk ,&nbsp;Paras B. Bassuk ,&nbsp;Adeli Block ,&nbsp;Reinaldo Cabrera Pérez ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Carlson ,&nbsp;Sita Carraturo ,&nbsp;Andrew Cheng ,&nbsp;Lauretta S.P. Cheng ,&nbsp;Philip Combiths ,&nbsp;Ruthe Foushee ,&nbsp;Anne Therese Frederiksen ,&nbsp;Devin Grammon ,&nbsp;Rachel Hayes-Harb ,&nbsp;Eve Higby ,&nbsp;Kelly Kendro ,&nbsp;Elena Koulidobrova ,&nbsp;Kelly Elizabeth Wright","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106444","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106444","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Essentialist categorizations of language users, such as <span>native speaker</span>, are widely used but lack empirical validity and reinforce social inequities. This article focuses on the <span>nativeness</span> construct, critically examining how its centrality in social-scientific research distorts scholarly inquiry, introduces bias in educational and clinical assessments, and perpetuates exclusion in academia. We argue that such labels impose artificial homogeneity, devalue linguistic diversity, and contribute to systemic biases in society. By reifying social divisions, essentialist categorizations can exclude marginalized groups, perpetuate linguistic discrimination, and hinder scientific progress. We advocate for a shift away from essentialist proxies and toward more contextually grounded and empirically driven characterizations of language use. A reflexive and interdisciplinary approach is necessary to dismantle these harmful frameworks and promote more accurate, inclusive, and equitable research. Our argument is relevant not just to the cognitive sciences, but to any scholarship which involves describing or understanding language. Ultimately, rejecting essentialist assumptions will lead to more nuanced understandings of language, identity, and social belonging, fostering both scientific and societal transformation by promoting justice and accuracy across social-scientific disciplines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A cognitive fallacy in a fish? Glass catfish, like humans, make sub-optimal choices in the Monty Hall dilemma 鱼的认知谬误?和人类一样,玻璃鲶鱼也会在蒙蒂·霍尔困境中做出次优选择
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106438
Christian Agrillo, Alessandra Pecunioso
Exploring cognitive fallacies is a key pursuit for neuroscientists as they offer a unique window into the foundations of how we think and make decisions. The Monty Hall dilemma (MHD) is a probability puzzle in which a person is offered a choice among three doors, behind one of which is a prize. After the person selects one door, the remaining door without the prize is revealed. The person is now given the option to either keep their original choice or switch to the other door. Most people stick with the initial choice, even though switching would offer a higher chance of winning. Here, we observed that a distantly related species, such as fish, shows a human-like behavior in the MHD, as they consistently maintained their first option. Our study suggests that the mechanisms behind misjudging two-stage decision-making involving conditioned probabilities may also be shared by smaller, non-cortical brains.
探索认知谬误是神经科学家的一个关键追求,因为它们为我们思考和决策的基础提供了一个独特的窗口。蒙蒂霍尔困境(MHD)是一个概率谜题,在这个谜题中,一个人要在三扇门中做出选择,其中一扇门后面有奖品。在这个人选择了一扇门之后,剩下的没有奖品的门就会显示出来。这个人现在可以选择保持原来的选择,或者换到另一扇门。大多数人坚持最初的选择,即使改变会有更高的获胜机会。在这里,我们观察到一个远亲物种,如鱼,在MHD中表现出类似人类的行为,因为它们始终保持第一种选择。我们的研究表明,涉及条件概率的两阶段决策错误判断背后的机制也可能与更小的非皮质大脑共享。
{"title":"A cognitive fallacy in a fish? Glass catfish, like humans, make sub-optimal choices in the Monty Hall dilemma","authors":"Christian Agrillo,&nbsp;Alessandra Pecunioso","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106438","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106438","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exploring cognitive fallacies is a key pursuit for neuroscientists as they offer a unique window into the foundations of how we think and make decisions. The Monty Hall dilemma (MHD) is a probability puzzle in which a person is offered a choice among three doors, behind one of which is a prize. After the person selects one door, the remaining door without the prize is revealed. The person is now given the option to either keep their original choice or switch to the other door. Most people stick with the initial choice, even though switching would offer a higher chance of winning. Here, we observed that a distantly related species, such as fish, shows a human-like behavior in the MHD, as they consistently maintained their first option. Our study suggests that the mechanisms behind misjudging two-stage decision-making involving conditioned probabilities may also be shared by smaller, non-cortical brains.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979901","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implicit causal inference in audiovisual spatial representations 视听空间表征中的内隐因果推理
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106413
Franziska Friemel , Tim Rohe
The causal inference problem in multisensory perception poses a fundamental challenge to our brains in a multisensory environment: how to decide whether sensory stimuli originate from a common source and should be integrated, or from distinct sources and should be segregated. The brain addresses this problem by inferring causal structure from the spatiotemporal disparity of multisensory stimuli. However, it remains unclear whether the brain handles causal inference implicitly, or whether it requires effortful and explicit cognitive processing. This study investigated how human observers (N = 47) implicitly infer causal structure when judging the auditory distance of two sequential audiovisual stimuli. In this distance task, we combined representational similarity analysis and multidimensional scaling to retrieve participants' auditory spatial representations. We then compared visual biases on auditory representations (i.e., the ventriloquist effect) to visual biases in three classical auditory localisation and causal judgment tasks. We found that visual biases in the distance task were less influenced by the spatial disparity of the audiovisual stimuli compared to the classical tasks. This pattern was best fitted by a computational stochastic-fusion model. Only in the joint localisation and causal task, small spatial disparity increased the visual bias as predicted by a computational Bayesian causal inference model. Our results suggest that causal inference requires explicit cognitive processing that observers only apply if the causal structure of stimuli is directly relevant to the task. Otherwise, the brain relies on simpler automatic decision strategies such as stochastic fusion.
多感官知觉中的因果推理问题对我们的大脑在多感官环境中提出了一个根本性的挑战:如何决定感官刺激是来自一个共同的来源,应该整合,还是来自不同的来源,应该分开。大脑通过从多感觉刺激的时空差异中推断因果结构来解决这个问题。然而,目前尚不清楚大脑是否隐含地处理因果推理,或者它是否需要努力和明确的认知处理。本研究探讨了人类观察者(N = 47)在判断两个连续视听刺激的听觉距离时如何隐含地推断因果结构。在这个距离任务中,我们结合了表征相似性分析和多维尺度来检索被试的听觉空间表征。然后,我们比较了三种经典的听觉定位和因果判断任务中听觉表征的视觉偏差(即腹语者效应)和视觉偏差。研究发现,与经典任务相比,距离任务中的视觉偏差受视听刺激空间差异的影响较小。这种模式最适合于计算随机融合模型。根据计算贝叶斯因果推理模型预测,只有在联合定位和因果任务中,小的空间差异才会增加视觉偏差。我们的研究结果表明,因果推理需要明确的认知加工,观察者只有在刺激的因果结构与任务直接相关时才会应用这种加工。否则,大脑依赖于更简单的自动决策策略,如随机融合。
{"title":"Implicit causal inference in audiovisual spatial representations","authors":"Franziska Friemel ,&nbsp;Tim Rohe","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106413","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106413","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The causal inference problem in multisensory perception poses a fundamental challenge to our brains in a multisensory environment: how to decide whether sensory stimuli originate from a common source and should be integrated, or from distinct sources and should be segregated. The brain addresses this problem by inferring causal structure from the spatiotemporal disparity of multisensory stimuli. However, it remains unclear whether the brain handles causal inference implicitly, or whether it requires effortful and explicit cognitive processing. This study investigated how human observers (<em>N</em> = 47) implicitly infer causal structure when judging the auditory distance of two sequential audiovisual stimuli. In this distance task, we combined representational similarity analysis and multidimensional scaling to retrieve participants' auditory spatial representations. We then compared visual biases on auditory representations (i.e., the ventriloquist effect) to visual biases in three classical auditory localisation and causal judgment tasks. We found that visual biases in the distance task were less influenced by the spatial disparity of the audiovisual stimuli compared to the classical tasks. This pattern was best fitted by a computational stochastic-fusion model. Only in the joint localisation and causal task, small spatial disparity increased the visual bias as predicted by a computational Bayesian causal inference model. Our results suggest that causal inference requires explicit cognitive processing that observers only apply if the causal structure of stimuli is directly relevant to the task. Otherwise, the brain relies on simpler automatic decision strategies such as stochastic fusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Many heads are more utilitarian than one, but are they also less deontological? Reply to Baron and Skovgaard-Olsen (2026) 许多人头比一个人头更功利,但它们的义务论也更少吗?回复巴伦和斯科夫加德-奥尔森(2026)
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106441
Bertram Gawronski , Marta Rokosz , Michal M. Stefanczyk , Michał Białek
Using the CNI model to quantify three factors underlying moral-dilemma judgments, Rokosz et al. (2025) found that groups show greater concerns about outcomes than individuals, but do not differ in terms of norm adherence and general action tendencies. In a commentary on this work, Baron and Skovgaard-Olsen (2026) argue that (a) groups show less “nonsensical” judgments and (b) analyses controlling for this difference reveal that groups additionally show weaker concerns about moral norms. The current reply identifies conceptual and empirical problems with Baron and Skovgaard-Olsen's (2026) arguments. Expanding on this discussion, we present an alternative reanalysis of Rokosz et al.'s (2025) data to gauge the robustness of their findings against model specifications. Our reanalysis revealed (a) robust evidence that groups are more concerned about outcomes than individuals and (b) some evidence for differential concerns about moral norms, but this evidence is less reliable in that it depends on data-analytic choices.
Rokosz等人(2025)使用CNI模型量化了道德困境判断背后的三个因素,发现群体比个人更关注结果,但在规范遵守和一般行动倾向方面没有差异。在对这项工作的评论中,Baron和Skovgaard-Olsen(2026)认为(a)群体表现出较少的“荒谬”判断,(b)控制这种差异的分析表明,群体对道德规范的关注也较弱。目前的回答指出了Baron和Skovgaard-Olsen(2026)的论点在概念和经验上的问题。在此讨论的基础上,我们对Rokosz等人(2025)的数据进行了另一种重新分析,以衡量他们的发现对模型规范的稳健性。我们的重新分析揭示了:(a)群体比个人更关心结果的有力证据;(b)对道德规范的不同关注的一些证据,但这些证据不太可靠,因为它取决于数据分析的选择。
{"title":"Many heads are more utilitarian than one, but are they also less deontological? Reply to Baron and Skovgaard-Olsen (2026)","authors":"Bertram Gawronski ,&nbsp;Marta Rokosz ,&nbsp;Michal M. Stefanczyk ,&nbsp;Michał Białek","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106441","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106441","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using the CNI model to quantify three factors underlying moral-dilemma judgments, Rokosz et al. (2025) found that groups show greater concerns about outcomes than individuals, but do not differ in terms of norm adherence and general action tendencies. In a commentary on this work, Baron and Skovgaard-Olsen (2026) argue that (a) groups show less “nonsensical” judgments and (b) analyses controlling for this difference reveal that groups additionally show weaker concerns about moral norms. The current reply identifies conceptual and empirical problems with Baron and Skovgaard-Olsen's (2026) arguments. Expanding on this discussion, we present an alternative reanalysis of Rokosz et al.'s (2025) data to gauge the robustness of their findings against model specifications. Our reanalysis revealed (a) robust evidence that groups are more concerned about outcomes than individuals and (b) some evidence for differential concerns about moral norms, but this evidence is less reliable in that it depends on data-analytic choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Origins of understanding fair resource collection 理解公平资源收集的起源
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106434
Mia Radovanovic , Jaemin Hwang , David M. Sobel , Jessica A. Sommerville
Concerns about fair resource exchanges are pervasive across development. However, existing work has focused primarily on resource distributions. The present experiments investigated whether 14- to 17-month-old North American infants demonstrate expectations for fair resource collection events, in contrast to expectations for resource distribution events. We found that infants' expectations for equal resource collections emerged by 16 months of age, whereas infants at all ages tested expected equal resource distributions. These findings suggest infants possess a broader, early-emerging understanding of fairness as it applies across resource exchanges, while highlighting a slight decalage in reasoning about resource collection versus distribution events.
对公平资源交换的关切在整个发展过程中普遍存在。然而,现有的工作主要集中在资源分配上。本实验调查了14至17个月大的北美婴儿是否表现出对公平资源收集事件的期望,而不是对资源分配事件的期望。我们发现,婴儿在16个月大的时候就出现了对平等资源收集的期望,而所有年龄的婴儿都期望平等的资源分配。这些发现表明,婴儿对公平有着更广泛的、早期形成的理解,因为它适用于资源交换,同时强调了在资源收集与分配事件的推理方面的轻微缺陷。
{"title":"Origins of understanding fair resource collection","authors":"Mia Radovanovic ,&nbsp;Jaemin Hwang ,&nbsp;David M. Sobel ,&nbsp;Jessica A. Sommerville","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106434","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106434","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concerns about fair resource exchanges are pervasive across development. However, existing work has focused primarily on resource distributions. The present experiments investigated whether 14- to 17-month-old North American infants demonstrate expectations for fair resource collection events, in contrast to expectations for resource distribution events. We found that infants' expectations for equal resource collections emerged by 16 months of age, whereas infants at all ages tested expected equal resource distributions. These findings suggest infants possess a broader, early-emerging understanding of fairness as it applies across resource exchanges, while highlighting a slight decalage in reasoning about resource collection versus distribution events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cross-linguistic zero-shot communication via ad-hoc pseudowords 通过特别的假词进行跨语言零射击交流
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106440
Fritz Günther , Aliona Petrenco , Daniele Gatti
In verbal communication, speakers must encode meanings into signs such as words. Within a given language community, the correspondence between word forms and meanings can become conventionalized. However, speakers from different language communities cannot rely on these shared conventions. Here, we investigate whether purely verbal communication using single words is still possible in such a context, enabled by generalized form-meaning mappings. In a pre-registered experiment, we presented Italian speakers with words and instructed them to come up with corresponding German translations. The resulting German-like pseudowords were then shown to German speakers, who were asked to guess the original words. Supporting our hypotheses, results showed that the German participants’ guesses were semantically closer to the original words than to randomly selected control words. These findings highlight the remarkable human ability to spontaneously create and interpret meaningful signals, even across language boundaries and without relying on an established mutually-known lexicon.
在言语交流中,说话者必须将意义编码成符号,如单词。在一个特定的语言群体中,词形和词义之间的对应关系可能变得约定俗成。然而,来自不同语言社区的使用者不能依赖这些共同的约定。在这里,我们研究了在这种情况下,通过广义的形式-意义映射,是否仍然可能使用单个单词进行纯粹的口头交流。在一个预先注册的实验中,我们向说意大利语的人展示一些单词,并指示他们想出相应的德语翻译。然后,研究人员将这些类似德语的假词展示给说德语的人看,让他们猜测这些假词的原意。支持我们的假设,结果表明,德国参与者的猜测在语义上更接近原始单词,而不是随机选择的对照单词。这些发现强调了人类自发创造和解释有意义的信号的非凡能力,即使跨越语言界限,也不依赖于既定的已知词汇。
{"title":"Cross-linguistic zero-shot communication via ad-hoc pseudowords","authors":"Fritz Günther ,&nbsp;Aliona Petrenco ,&nbsp;Daniele Gatti","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106440","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106440","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In verbal communication, speakers must encode meanings into signs such as words. Within a given language community, the correspondence between word forms and meanings can become conventionalized. However, speakers from different language communities cannot rely on these shared conventions. Here, we investigate whether purely verbal communication using single words is still possible in such a context, enabled by generalized form-meaning mappings. In a pre-registered experiment, we presented Italian speakers with words and instructed them to come up with corresponding German translations. The resulting German-like pseudowords were then shown to German speakers, who were asked to guess the original words. Supporting our hypotheses, results showed that the German participants’ guesses were semantically closer to the original words than to randomly selected control words. These findings highlight the remarkable human ability to spontaneously create and interpret meaningful signals, even across language boundaries and without relying on an established mutually-known lexicon.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145979903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to "The effect of gaze contingencies on infants' looking preference" [Cognition 270 (2026) 106417]. “凝视偶然性对婴儿外观偏好的影响”的更正[认知270(2026)106417]。
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106446
Tal Ravid-Roth, Romi Livne, Ariel Berlinger, Wilfried Kunde, Baruch Eitam, Sagi Jaffe-Dax
{"title":"Corrigendum to \"The effect of gaze contingencies on infants' looking preference\" [Cognition 270 (2026) 106417].","authors":"Tal Ravid-Roth, Romi Livne, Ariel Berlinger, Wilfried Kunde, Baruch Eitam, Sagi Jaffe-Dax","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106446","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"106446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Representation of event boundedness in English and Mandarin speakers 事件有界性在英语和普通话使用者中的表征
IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106443
Yue Ji , Anna Papafragou
Event cognition is sensitive to whether an event is bounded (has a well-defined endpoint, e.g. build a sandcastle) or unbounded (lacks such an endpoint; e.g., play with sand). Boundedness interfaces with telicity in language: telic verb phrases denote events that include an inherent or natural endpoint while atelic verb phrases denote events that lack such an endpoint. Given that languages encode telicity in different ways, could these cross-linguistic differences influence the perception of event boundedness? We address this question by comparing English and Mandarin native speakers. We show that the two groups differ in their use of telicity in event descriptions (Experiment 1) but perform similarly when rating the likelihood of an event having a natural endpoint (Experiment 2) or attending to the temporal structure of bounded vs. unbounded events in a perceptual task (Experiment 3). These findings reveal commonalities in the representation of the temporal profile of events despite cross-linguistic differences.
事件认知对事件是有界的(有明确的端点,如建造沙堡)还是无界的(没有这样的端点,如玩沙)很敏感。有界性与语言中的远性相连接:远性动词短语表示包含固有或自然端点的事件,而远性动词短语表示缺乏此类端点的事件。考虑到语言以不同的方式编码远性,这些跨语言差异会影响对事件边界的感知吗?我们通过比较英语和普通话母语人士来解决这个问题。我们发现,这两组在事件描述(实验1)中使用远性有所不同,但在评估事件具有自然终点的可能性(实验2)或关注知觉任务中有界事件与无界事件的时间结构(实验3)时表现相似。这些发现揭示了尽管跨语言存在差异,但对事件时间轮廓的表征具有共性。
{"title":"Representation of event boundedness in English and Mandarin speakers","authors":"Yue Ji ,&nbsp;Anna Papafragou","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106443","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106443","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Event cognition is sensitive to whether an event is bounded (has a well-defined endpoint, e.g. build a sandcastle) or unbounded (lacks such an endpoint; e.g., play with sand). Boundedness interfaces with telicity in language: telic verb phrases denote events that include an inherent or natural endpoint while atelic verb phrases denote events that lack such an endpoint. Given that languages encode telicity in different ways, could these cross-linguistic differences influence the perception of event boundedness? We address this question by comparing English and Mandarin native speakers. We show that the two groups differ in their use of telicity in event descriptions (Experiment 1) but perform similarly when rating the likelihood of an event having a natural endpoint (Experiment 2) or attending to the temporal structure of bounded vs. unbounded events in a perceptual task (Experiment 3). These findings reveal commonalities in the representation of the temporal profile of events despite cross-linguistic differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 106443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145928637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Cognition
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1