Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000435
Selina Allu, Mary Beaucage, Maoliosa Donald, Manuel Escoto, Joanne Kappel, Louise Morrin, Steven D Soroka
{"title":"Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example.","authors":"Selina Allu, Mary Beaucage, Maoliosa Donald, Manuel Escoto, Joanne Kappel, Louise Morrin, Steven D Soroka","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Research is critical for uncovering new and effective therapies for better health outcomes, yet there remains a significant lag between identifying evidence-based interventions and implementing them into practice. Research teams can often be experienced in evidence generation, but less so in evidence implementation, underscoring the need for more customized tools to support them in this latter step. The implementation stage can be especially challenging given how strategies must be tailored to the unique end users and contexts of a given intervention. Therefore, our patient-oriented kidney research network sought to create an \"Implementation Toolkit\" and \"Pathway to Implementation\" guide to help research teams and their operational and clinical partners in implementing their interventions. Importantly, the tools were created using input and feedback from diverse groups, including patient partners, implementation science experts, researchers, operational leaders, and policymakers, all of whom play role in supporting the implementation of health interventions. Our tools are widely applicable to diverse teams, regardless of the intervention or innovation being implemented.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A214.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":"418-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Research is critical for uncovering new and effective therapies for better health outcomes, yet there remains a significant lag between identifying evidence-based interventions and implementing them into practice. Research teams can often be experienced in evidence generation, but less so in evidence implementation, underscoring the need for more customized tools to support them in this latter step. The implementation stage can be especially challenging given how strategies must be tailored to the unique end users and contexts of a given intervention. Therefore, our patient-oriented kidney research network sought to create an "Implementation Toolkit" and "Pathway to Implementation" guide to help research teams and their operational and clinical partners in implementing their interventions. Importantly, the tools were created using input and feedback from diverse groups, including patient partners, implementation science experts, researchers, operational leaders, and policymakers, all of whom play role in supporting the implementation of health interventions. Our tools are widely applicable to diverse teams, regardless of the intervention or innovation being implemented.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A214.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作实施科学:Can-SOLVE CKD 案例。
摘要:研究对于发现新的有效疗法以改善健康状况至关重要,但在确定循证干预措施和将其付诸实践之间仍存在很大差距。研究团队通常在证据生成方面经验丰富,但在证据实施方面经验较少,这说明在后一步骤中需要更多定制工具来支持他们。实施阶段尤其具有挑战性,因为必须根据特定干预措施的独特最终用户和背景来调整策略。因此,我们以患者为导向的肾脏研究网络试图创建一个 "实施工具包 "和 "实施路径 "指南,以帮助研究团队及其运营和临床合作伙伴实施干预措施。重要的是,这些工具是根据不同群体的意见和反馈创建的,这些群体包括患者合作伙伴、实施科学专家、研究人员、业务领导和政策制定者,他们都在支持健康干预措施的实施方面发挥着作用。我们的工具广泛适用于不同的团队,无论实施的是何种干预或创新。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A214。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Nutrition as therapy - the role of dietitian counseling: a best practice implementation project. Pain assessment and management in patients with dementia in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project. Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1