Individual and contextual-level predictors of progression in the bystander intervention model

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Aggressive Behavior Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1002/ab.22159
Amanda B. Nickerson, Lyndsay N. Jenkins, Yanyun Yang, Dylan S. Harrison
{"title":"Individual and contextual-level predictors of progression in the bystander intervention model","authors":"Amanda B. Nickerson,&nbsp;Lyndsay N. Jenkins,&nbsp;Yanyun Yang,&nbsp;Dylan S. Harrison","doi":"10.1002/ab.22159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The situational model of bystander behavior is a validated 5-step process for understanding intervention in bullying and sexual harassment, yet the individual-level and contextual-level factors that facilitate the progression from one step to the next are not well understood. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether individual characteristics (social-emotional skills, affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and personal attitudes toward bullying and sexual harassment) and contextual-level factors (school climate and perceived peer attitudes toward bullying and sexual harassment) explained the association between subsequent steps of the bystander intervention model. A sample of 788 high school students completed several validated measures of these constructs. Structural equation modeling analysis revealed that each step significantly and positively predicted the next step, and the addition of a direct path from accepting responsibility to helping improved model fit. The mediational model indicated that individual-level characteristics had significant direct effects on interpreting bullying and sexual harassment as problems, accepting responsibility, and helping, and indirect effects from noticing the bullying and sexual harassment to all subsequent steps except knowing. In contrast, contextual-level effects contributed to accepting responsibility in an inverse direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50842,"journal":{"name":"Aggressive Behavior","volume":"50 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aggressive Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ab.22159","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The situational model of bystander behavior is a validated 5-step process for understanding intervention in bullying and sexual harassment, yet the individual-level and contextual-level factors that facilitate the progression from one step to the next are not well understood. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether individual characteristics (social-emotional skills, affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and personal attitudes toward bullying and sexual harassment) and contextual-level factors (school climate and perceived peer attitudes toward bullying and sexual harassment) explained the association between subsequent steps of the bystander intervention model. A sample of 788 high school students completed several validated measures of these constructs. Structural equation modeling analysis revealed that each step significantly and positively predicted the next step, and the addition of a direct path from accepting responsibility to helping improved model fit. The mediational model indicated that individual-level characteristics had significant direct effects on interpreting bullying and sexual harassment as problems, accepting responsibility, and helping, and indirect effects from noticing the bullying and sexual harassment to all subsequent steps except knowing. In contrast, contextual-level effects contributed to accepting responsibility in an inverse direction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旁观者干预模式中个人和环境层面的进展预测因素。
旁观者行为情境模型是一个经过验证的五步流程,可用于理解对欺凌和性骚扰行为的干预,但人们对促进从一个步骤到下一个步骤的个人层面和情境层面因素并不十分了解。本研究旨在考察个体特征(社会情感技能、情感移情、认知移情以及个人对欺凌和性骚扰的态度)和环境因素(学校氛围和感知到的同伴对欺凌和性骚扰的态度)是否能解释旁观者干预模型后续步骤之间的关联。788 名高中生样本完成了对这些结构的几种有效测量。结构方程模型分析表明,每个步骤都对下一个步骤有显著的正向预测作用,而且增加了从承担责任到提供帮助的直接路径,提高了模型的拟合度。中介模型表明,个人层面的特征对将欺凌和性骚扰解释为问题、承担责任和提供帮助有明显的直接影响,而从注意到欺凌和性骚扰到除了解之外的所有后续步骤都有间接影响。与此相反,情境层面的影响以相反的方向促进了承担责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aggressive Behavior
Aggressive Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aggressive Behavior will consider manuscripts in the English language concerning the fields of Animal Behavior, Anthropology, Ethology, Psychiatry, Psychobiology, Psychology, and Sociology which relate to either overt or implied conflict behaviors. Papers concerning mechanisms underlying or influencing behaviors generally regarded as aggressive and the physiological and/or behavioral consequences of being subject to such behaviors will fall within the scope of the journal. Review articles will be considered as well as empirical and theoretical articles. Aggressive Behavior is the official journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression.
期刊最新文献
How Affective Relationships and Classroom Norms Shape Perceptions of Aggressor, Victim, and Defender Roles Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Daily Life: An Exploratory Experience-Sampling Method Study The Role of Classroom Collective Efficacy and Self-Concept in Peer Relationship and Victimization of Elementary School Students: A Multilevel Moderated Mediation Analysis What Dyadic Internet Street Fight Videos Can and Cannot Tell Us About the Ethological, Game Theoretic, and Sex-Differentiated Phenomenology of Human Physical Aggression The Role of Visual and Chemosensory Signals in Male–Male Aggression of the Cichlid Astatotilapia burtoni
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1