Intestinal mucosal immunity is unimportant for polio eradication: the failure of oral polio vaccination.

Infectious diseases (London, England) Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1080/23744235.2024.2367742
T Jacob John, Dhanya Dharmapalan, Norbert Hirschhorn
{"title":"Intestinal mucosal immunity is unimportant for polio eradication: the failure of oral polio vaccination.","authors":"T Jacob John, Dhanya Dharmapalan, Norbert Hirschhorn","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2024.2367742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore if intestinal immunity induced by infection with live viruses in the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) is essential, necessary or even helpful in interrupting transmission of wild poliovirus (WPV) for global polio eradication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the biology of virus-host interactions in WPV infection and its alterations by OPV-induced immunity for direct evidence of the usefulness of intestinal immunity. We also explored indirect evidence by way of the effect of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) on the biology and on transmission dynamics of WPV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immunity, systemic and intestinal, induced by infection with WPV or vaccine viruses, does not prevent re-infection with WPV or vaccine viruses respectively, when exposed. Such re-infected hosts shed virus in the throat and in faeces and are sources of further transmission. Immunity protects against polio paralysis-hence reinfection always remain asymptommatic and silent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vaccine virus-induced intestinal immunity is not necessary for polio eradication. The continued and intensive vaccination efforts using OPV under the assumption of its superiority over IPV have resulted in the well-known undesirable effects, namely vaccine associated paralytic polio and the emergence of de-attenuated circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses, in addition to the delay in completing global WPV eradication.</p>","PeriodicalId":73372,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"669-677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2367742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To explore if intestinal immunity induced by infection with live viruses in the oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) is essential, necessary or even helpful in interrupting transmission of wild poliovirus (WPV) for global polio eradication.

Methods: We reviewed the biology of virus-host interactions in WPV infection and its alterations by OPV-induced immunity for direct evidence of the usefulness of intestinal immunity. We also explored indirect evidence by way of the effect of the inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) on the biology and on transmission dynamics of WPV.

Results: Immunity, systemic and intestinal, induced by infection with WPV or vaccine viruses, does not prevent re-infection with WPV or vaccine viruses respectively, when exposed. Such re-infected hosts shed virus in the throat and in faeces and are sources of further transmission. Immunity protects against polio paralysis-hence reinfection always remain asymptommatic and silent.

Conclusion: Vaccine virus-induced intestinal immunity is not necessary for polio eradication. The continued and intensive vaccination efforts using OPV under the assumption of its superiority over IPV have resulted in the well-known undesirable effects, namely vaccine associated paralytic polio and the emergence of de-attenuated circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses, in addition to the delay in completing global WPV eradication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠粘膜免疫对根除脊髓灰质炎并不重要:口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗的失败。
目的:探讨口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(OPV)中的活病毒感染所诱导的肠道免疫对于阻断脊髓灰质炎野病毒(WPV)的传播是否必要、必需甚至有助于全球根除脊髓灰质炎:方法:我们回顾了 WPV 感染过程中病毒与宿主相互作用的生物学特性,以及 OPV 诱导的免疫对这一特性的改变,以寻找肠道免疫有用性的直接证据。我们还通过脊髓灰质炎病毒灭活疫苗(IPV)对 WPV 生物学和传播动态的影响探讨了间接证据:结果:感染 WPV 或疫苗病毒后诱发的全身免疫和肠道免疫并不能防止再次感染 WPV 或疫苗病毒。这些再次感染的宿主会在咽喉和粪便中脱落病毒,成为进一步传播的源头。免疫可防止脊髓灰质炎麻痹,因此再感染始终无症状、无声无息:结论:疫苗病毒诱导的肠道免疫并非根除脊髓灰质炎的必要条件。在假定 OPV 优于 IPV 的情况下,持续密集地使用 OPV 进行疫苗接种,导致了众所周知的不良后果,即与疫苗相关的麻痹性脊髓灰质炎和出现去弱化的疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒,此外还推迟了全球根除 WPV 的进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Infection type and short-term mortality in patients with infection-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a cohort study. Impact of an electronic surveillance system on compliance with isolation precaution measures: an interrupted time series study. Predictors of mortality in patients with Gram-Negative Bacilli (GNB) blood stream infections (BSI): multicentre data from India. Infective endocarditis caused by Gemella - a retrospective registry-based study. Helminthiasis and mpox vaccination: challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1