Impact of an electronic surveillance system on compliance with isolation precaution measures: an interrupted time series study.

Alexandre Baudet, Julie Lizon, Marie Regad, Vincent Faivre, Anaïs Colas, Béatrice Demoré, Arnaud Florentin
{"title":"Impact of an electronic surveillance system on compliance with isolation precaution measures: an interrupted time series study.","authors":"Alexandre Baudet, Julie Lizon, Marie Regad, Vincent Faivre, Anaïs Colas, Béatrice Demoré, Arnaud Florentin","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2025.2449930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic surveillance systems (ESSs) may assist infection prevention and control (IPC) teams in detecting and monitoring patients infected or colonised by pathogens to prevent healthcare-associated infections. We aimed to assess the impact of implementing an ESS on compliance with isolation precaution measures for bacterial infections or colonizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental before-after study was conducted using interrupted time series analysis from 1 March 2018 to 31 July 2024 at the University Hospital of Nancy (France). The ESS was implemented in October 2022. The results of audits conducted by IPC nurses to investigate isolation measures for inpatients that required isolation precautions were aggregated monthly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1379 audits were included in the study. The implementation of the ESS had no significant immediate impact on isolation measures, except for an increase in the presence of adequate hand hygiene products (+10.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). After the COVID-19 period, all isolation measures decreased. The implementation of the ESS was associated with positive changes in trends of isolation measures, particularly for the prescription of isolation precautions (+1.1%/month, <i>p</i> < 0.01), the isolation signage (+1.2%/month, <i>p</i> < 0.001), the hand hygiene products (+0.8%/month, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and full compliance with isolation measures (+1.1%/month, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The audit rate significantly increased in the first 7 months of ESS use but then decreased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The positive impact of ESS on compliance with isolation measures was likely due to the increased presence and communication of the IPC team in care wards, which was facilitated by the time saved in the surveillance and detection of carriers through the ESS.</p>","PeriodicalId":73372,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2025.2449930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electronic surveillance systems (ESSs) may assist infection prevention and control (IPC) teams in detecting and monitoring patients infected or colonised by pathogens to prevent healthcare-associated infections. We aimed to assess the impact of implementing an ESS on compliance with isolation precaution measures for bacterial infections or colonizations.

Methods: A quasi-experimental before-after study was conducted using interrupted time series analysis from 1 March 2018 to 31 July 2024 at the University Hospital of Nancy (France). The ESS was implemented in October 2022. The results of audits conducted by IPC nurses to investigate isolation measures for inpatients that required isolation precautions were aggregated monthly.

Results: 1379 audits were included in the study. The implementation of the ESS had no significant immediate impact on isolation measures, except for an increase in the presence of adequate hand hygiene products (+10.1%, p < 0.01). After the COVID-19 period, all isolation measures decreased. The implementation of the ESS was associated with positive changes in trends of isolation measures, particularly for the prescription of isolation precautions (+1.1%/month, p < 0.01), the isolation signage (+1.2%/month, p < 0.001), the hand hygiene products (+0.8%/month, p < 0.01), and full compliance with isolation measures (+1.1%/month, p < 0.0001). The audit rate significantly increased in the first 7 months of ESS use but then decreased.

Conclusions: The positive impact of ESS on compliance with isolation measures was likely due to the increased presence and communication of the IPC team in care wards, which was facilitated by the time saved in the surveillance and detection of carriers through the ESS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子监控系统对隔离预防措施依从性的影响:一项中断时间序列研究。
背景:电子监测系统(ESSs)可以帮助感染预防和控制(IPC)团队发现和监测被病原体感染或定植的患者,以预防卫生保健相关感染。我们的目的是评估实施ESS对遵守细菌感染或定植隔离预防措施的影响。方法:采用中断时间序列分析方法,于2018年3月1日至2024年7月31日在法国南希大学医院进行准实验前后研究。ESS于2022年10月实施。IPC护士为调查需要隔离预防措施的住院患者的隔离措施而进行的审计结果每月汇总。结果:1379名审计人员被纳入研究。ESS的实施对隔离措施没有显著的直接影响,除了增加了充足的手卫生用品的存在(+10.1%,p p p p p p p)。结论:ESS对隔离措施依从性的积极影响可能是由于IPC团队在护理病房的存在和沟通的增加,这得益于通过ESS监测和检测携带者节省的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Infection type and short-term mortality in patients with infection-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a cohort study. Impact of an electronic surveillance system on compliance with isolation precaution measures: an interrupted time series study. Predictors of mortality in patients with Gram-Negative Bacilli (GNB) blood stream infections (BSI): multicentre data from India. Infective endocarditis caused by Gemella - a retrospective registry-based study. Helminthiasis and mpox vaccination: challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1