Metabolic, cardiovascular, neuromuscular and perceptual responses to repeated military-specific load carriage treadmill simulations

Christopher A. J. Vine, Sarah L. Coakley, Sam D. Blacker, Oliver R. Runswick, Stephen D. Myers
{"title":"Metabolic, cardiovascular, neuromuscular and perceptual responses to repeated military-specific load carriage treadmill simulations","authors":"Christopher A. J. Vine,&nbsp;Sarah L. Coakley,&nbsp;Sam D. Blacker,&nbsp;Oliver R. Runswick,&nbsp;Stephen D. Myers","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bouts of military load carriage are rarely completed in isolation; however, limited research has investigated the physiological responses to repeated load carriage tasks. Twelve civilian men (age, 28 ± 8 years; stature, 185.6 ± 5.8 cm; body mass 84.3 ± 11.1 kg and maximal oxygen uptake, 51.5 ± 6.4 mL·kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) attended the laboratory on two occasions to undertake a familiarisation and an experimental session. Following their familiarisation session, participants completed three bouts of a fast load carriage protocol (FLCP; ∼65 min), carrying 25 kg, interspersed with a 65-min recovery period. Physiological strain (oxygen uptake [V̇O<sub>2</sub>] and heart rate [HR]) was assessed during the FLCP bouts, and physical performance assessments (weighted counter-movement jump [wCMJ], maximal isometric voluntary contraction of the quadriceps [MIVC] and seated medicine ball throw [SMBT]) was measured pre and post each FLCP bout. A main effect for bout and measurement time was evident for V̇O<sub>2</sub> and HR (both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = 0.103–0.816). There was no likely change in SMBT distance (<i>p</i> = 0.201 and Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = 0.004), but MIVC peak force reduced by approximately 25% across measurement points (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = 0.133). A mean percentage change of approximately −12% from initial values was also evident for peak wCMJ height (<i>p</i> = 0.001 and Ѡ<sup>2</sup> = 0.028). Collectively, these data demonstrate that repeated FLCP bouts result in an elevated physiological strain for each successive bout, along with a substantial reduction in lower body power (wCMJ and MIVC). Therefore, future research should investigate possible mitigation strategies to maintain role-related capability.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bouts of military load carriage are rarely completed in isolation; however, limited research has investigated the physiological responses to repeated load carriage tasks. Twelve civilian men (age, 28 ± 8 years; stature, 185.6 ± 5.8 cm; body mass 84.3 ± 11.1 kg and maximal oxygen uptake, 51.5 ± 6.4 mL·kg−1 min−1) attended the laboratory on two occasions to undertake a familiarisation and an experimental session. Following their familiarisation session, participants completed three bouts of a fast load carriage protocol (FLCP; ∼65 min), carrying 25 kg, interspersed with a 65-min recovery period. Physiological strain (oxygen uptake [V̇O2] and heart rate [HR]) was assessed during the FLCP bouts, and physical performance assessments (weighted counter-movement jump [wCMJ], maximal isometric voluntary contraction of the quadriceps [MIVC] and seated medicine ball throw [SMBT]) was measured pre and post each FLCP bout. A main effect for bout and measurement time was evident for V̇O2 and HR (both p < 0.001 and Ѡ2 = 0.103–0.816). There was no likely change in SMBT distance (p = 0.201 and Ѡ2 = 0.004), but MIVC peak force reduced by approximately 25% across measurement points (p < 0.001 and Ѡ2 = 0.133). A mean percentage change of approximately −12% from initial values was also evident for peak wCMJ height (p = 0.001 and Ѡ2 = 0.028). Collectively, these data demonstrate that repeated FLCP bouts result in an elevated physiological strain for each successive bout, along with a substantial reduction in lower body power (wCMJ and MIVC). Therefore, future research should investigate possible mitigation strategies to maintain role-related capability.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对反复进行的特定军事负荷跑步机模拟的代谢、心血管、神经肌肉和知觉反应。
军事负重训练很少单独完成;然而,对重复负重训练任务的生理反应的研究却很有限。12 名平民男子(年龄为 28 ± 8 岁;身材为 185.6 ± 5.8 厘米;体重为 84.3 ± 11.1 千克;最大摄氧量为 51.5 ± 6.4 毫升/千克-1 分钟-1)两次到实验室进行熟悉和实验训练。熟悉环节结束后,参与者完成了三次快速负重训练(FLCP;∼65 分钟),负重 25 公斤,中间有 65 分钟的恢复期。在快速负重训练期间评估生理负荷(摄氧量[VO2]和心率[HR]),并在快速负重训练前后测量体能表现(负重反向运动跳[wCMJ]、股四头肌最大等距自主收缩[MIVC]和坐姿掷实心球[SMBT])。VrousO2 和心率(p 2 = 0.103-0.816)对比赛和测量时间有明显的主效应。SMBT 距离可能没有变化(p = 0.201 和 Ѡ2 = 0.004),但 MIVC 峰值力在各测量点减少了约 25%(p 2 = 0.133)。wCMJ 的峰值高度与初始值相比也出现了约 -12% 的平均百分比变化(p = 0.001 和Ѡ2 = 0.028)。总之,这些数据表明,反复进行 FLCP 运动会导致每次连续运动的生理应变升高,同时下半身力量(wCMJ 和 MIVC)也会大幅下降。因此,未来的研究应调查可能的缓解策略,以保持与角色相关的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Women's rugby as a catalyst for advancing female-specific science and safety in sport. Case study of a world hour record simulation in an elite cyclist: Insight into task failure. Psychological and social factors associated with mental health of European dual career athletes: A systematic review. The effectiveness of cryostimulation exposure on sleep and recovery in male athletes: Timing considerations. The effects of plyometric versus resistance training on running economy and 5-km running time in middle-aged recreational runners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1