Can gene-editing accelerate the protein shift? Consumer acceptance of an upcycled meat-substitute

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102665
Anna Kristina Edenbrandt, Carl-Johan Lagerkvist
{"title":"Can gene-editing accelerate the protein shift? Consumer acceptance of an upcycled meat-substitute","authors":"Anna Kristina Edenbrandt,&nbsp;Carl-Johan Lagerkvist","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transforming waste in the production stage to food (upcycling) can contribute to increased environmental sustainability in the food systems. The side-stream in potato starch production contains protein, and gene-editing enables upcycling of potato-protein while avoiding the use of chemical processes in the extraction of food grade protein. We explore the demand for products containing this upcycled protein. Data were collected via an online survey of 1508 Swedish consumers who completed a choice experiment in which they selected among different sausages made from meat, soy, peas or potato-protein. Although meat is the most preferred product type, respondents choose potato-protein over soy and pea-protein. Upcycled potato-protein products are predicted to draw on the market share for meat more than from soy and pea-protein, suggesting considerable potential environmental benefits. The acceptance of upcycled products is not significantly different depending on if the upcycling is achieved by a chemical process or gene-editing (CRISPR-Cas9) techniques. We discuss the importance of the legal status of gene-editing and the role this may play in reducing food waste. Further, we discuss how policy makers can play an important role in reducing food waste, by means of regulations and by encouraging public and private initiatives that accommodate upcycling in the different stages of food production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000769/pdfft?md5=8b07340d73633252f0f73063781fe717&pid=1-s2.0-S0306919224000769-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000769","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transforming waste in the production stage to food (upcycling) can contribute to increased environmental sustainability in the food systems. The side-stream in potato starch production contains protein, and gene-editing enables upcycling of potato-protein while avoiding the use of chemical processes in the extraction of food grade protein. We explore the demand for products containing this upcycled protein. Data were collected via an online survey of 1508 Swedish consumers who completed a choice experiment in which they selected among different sausages made from meat, soy, peas or potato-protein. Although meat is the most preferred product type, respondents choose potato-protein over soy and pea-protein. Upcycled potato-protein products are predicted to draw on the market share for meat more than from soy and pea-protein, suggesting considerable potential environmental benefits. The acceptance of upcycled products is not significantly different depending on if the upcycling is achieved by a chemical process or gene-editing (CRISPR-Cas9) techniques. We discuss the importance of the legal status of gene-editing and the role this may play in reducing food waste. Further, we discuss how policy makers can play an important role in reducing food waste, by means of regulations and by encouraging public and private initiatives that accommodate upcycling in the different stages of food production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因编辑能否加速蛋白质的转变?消费者对可循环利用的肉类替代品的接受程度
将生产阶段的废物转化为食品(升级再循环)有助于提高食品系统的环境可持续性。马铃薯淀粉生产的副产品中含有蛋白质,基因编辑技术可实现马铃薯蛋白质的升级再循环,同时避免使用化学工艺提取食品级蛋白质。我们探讨了对含有这种升级再循环蛋白质的产品的需求。数据是通过对1508名瑞典消费者的在线调查收集的,这些消费者完成了一项选择实验,在实验中他们选择了由肉类、大豆、豌豆或马铃薯蛋白制成的不同香肠。尽管肉类是最受欢迎的产品类型,但受访者选择马铃薯蛋白而不是大豆和豌豆蛋白。据预测,马铃薯蛋白升级再造产品将比大豆和豌豆蛋白更能吸引肉类的市场份额,这表明潜在的环境效益相当可观。通过化学工艺或基因编辑(CRISPR-Cas9)技术实现的升级再造,对升级再造产品的接受程度并无明显差异。我们讨论了基因编辑法律地位的重要性,以及它在减少食物浪费方面可能发挥的作用。此外,我们还讨论了政策制定者如何在减少食物浪费方面发挥重要作用,具体方法包括制定法规,以及鼓励公共和私营机构在食物生产的不同阶段采取升级再循环措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
The distributional implications of health taxes: A case study on the Italian sugar tax Measuring changes in pork demand, welfare effects, and the role of information sources in the event of an African swine fever outbreak in the United States Food policies for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health (FoodPATH): A systems thinking approach Can gene-editing accelerate the protein shift? Consumer acceptance of an upcycled meat-substitute Public food procurement and production: Evidence of the food acquisition program in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1