A room of errors approach to analyzing beginning nursing students' safety recognition

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.03.009
Lisa A. Brening MSN, RN, Jordan Petz MSN, RN
{"title":"A room of errors approach to analyzing beginning nursing students' safety recognition","authors":"Lisa A. Brening MSN, RN,&nbsp;Jordan Petz MSN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Errors in healthcare remain one of the leading causes of death in the United States each year. Nurses are an integral part of the healthcare team and spend the most direct-care time with patients, placing them at the forefront of error mitigation. This study aims to evaluate the beginning nursing students' awareness of safety issues at the bedside.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Thirty-four students independently completed a “Room of Errors” simulation in week two of the first semester of a four-year baccalaureate nursing program. A repeat simulation was completed in week 13 with only 25 students participating, and a paired t-test was used to compare the results of those who completed both experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>Although the average number of errors identified increased from 9.68 to 14.64 out of 42 (p=&lt;0.001), the mean number of errors found per student remained low.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>While statistical significance is present, the number of errors not identified remains high. Continued research on best practices for implementing safety standards into nursing programs is necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Errors in healthcare remain one of the leading causes of death in the United States each year. Nurses are an integral part of the healthcare team and spend the most direct-care time with patients, placing them at the forefront of error mitigation. This study aims to evaluate the beginning nursing students' awareness of safety issues at the bedside.

Method

Thirty-four students independently completed a “Room of Errors” simulation in week two of the first semester of a four-year baccalaureate nursing program. A repeat simulation was completed in week 13 with only 25 students participating, and a paired t-test was used to compare the results of those who completed both experiences.

Result

Although the average number of errors identified increased from 9.68 to 14.64 out of 42 (p=<0.001), the mean number of errors found per student remained low.

Discussion

While statistical significance is present, the number of errors not identified remains high. Continued research on best practices for implementing safety standards into nursing programs is necessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析初学护理专业学生安全意识的错误室方法
背景在美国,医疗保健领域的差错仍然是每年导致死亡的主要原因之一。护士是医疗团队中不可或缺的一部分,与患者直接接触的时间最多,因此她们处于减少差错的最前沿。本研究旨在评估初学护理专业的学生对床边安全问题的认识。方法34 名学生在四年制本科护理专业第一学期的第二周独立完成了 "错误房间 "模拟。结果虽然42名学生中发现错误的平均人数从9.68人增加到14.64人(p=<0.001),但每名学生发现错误的平均人数仍然很低。讨论虽然存在统计学意义,但未发现错误的人数仍然很高。有必要继续研究在护理课程中实施安全标准的最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Perception of caring behaviors of faculty members from the perspective of nursing students The Urgency of Teaching Theory in the Current Nursing Education Landscape OADN's Milestone Anniversary: Celebrating 40 Years of Advocacy, Education, and Leadership Nurse Educators’ Perspectives in Facilitating Ethics Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities in a pre-licensure nursing program to facilitate competency-based education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1