The perceived preparedness of prelicensure nursing students to transition to practice

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.001
Ahlam Jadalla PhD, RN, EBP-C, FAAN , Kholoud Hardan-Khalil PhD, RN, CCRN-K , Melissa Dyo PhD, RN, AGNP-C , Jill Kardously DNP. APRN, FNP-BC, PHN , Katie Skaff RN-BC , Michael Williams PhD, RN, CCRN, CNE
{"title":"The perceived preparedness of prelicensure nursing students to transition to practice","authors":"Ahlam Jadalla PhD, RN, EBP-C, FAAN ,&nbsp;Kholoud Hardan-Khalil PhD, RN, CCRN-K ,&nbsp;Melissa Dyo PhD, RN, AGNP-C ,&nbsp;Jill Kardously DNP. APRN, FNP-BC, PHN ,&nbsp;Katie Skaff RN-BC ,&nbsp;Michael Williams PhD, RN, CCRN, CNE","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The impact of clinical site limitations on the categories of clinical competencies among prelicensure nursing students (PNSs) is not clear.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To describe the perceived clinical preparedness of PNSs who experience alterations in their training.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-four PNSs were surveyed using the Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ). CCQ measures four categories of nursing competencies: (a) professional behaviors (PB), (b) general performance (GP), (c) core skills (CS), and (d) advanced skills (ANS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most students (89%) reported feeling unprepared to enter practice or reenter clinical settings. The average overall perceived competence score was 169 (<em>SD</em> = 22, 128-212). The averages for PB, GP, CS, and AS were low. Students’ CS and AS scores were significantly and negatively correlated with the number of altered courses (<em>r</em> = −.38<em>, p</em> = .008<em>; r</em> = −.35, <em>p = .</em>018 respectively), and students’ GP scores were significantly, and inversely, associated with the number of missed clinical days (<em>r</em> = −.32, <em>p</em> = .03).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Students who experience alterations feel unprepared to transition to practice. The findings can guide the training needed for PNSs before reentering clinical rotations or upon joining the workforce.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"19 3","pages":"Pages 260-264"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000763/pdfft?md5=920d87bad7088f23130d3197551512f0&pid=1-s2.0-S1557308724000763-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724000763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The impact of clinical site limitations on the categories of clinical competencies among prelicensure nursing students (PNSs) is not clear.

Aim

To describe the perceived clinical preparedness of PNSs who experience alterations in their training.

Methods

Forty-four PNSs were surveyed using the Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ). CCQ measures four categories of nursing competencies: (a) professional behaviors (PB), (b) general performance (GP), (c) core skills (CS), and (d) advanced skills (ANS).

Results

Most students (89%) reported feeling unprepared to enter practice or reenter clinical settings. The average overall perceived competence score was 169 (SD = 22, 128-212). The averages for PB, GP, CS, and AS were low. Students’ CS and AS scores were significantly and negatively correlated with the number of altered courses (r = −.38, p = .008; r = −.35, p = .018 respectively), and students’ GP scores were significantly, and inversely, associated with the number of missed clinical days (r = −.32, p = .03).

Conclusions

Students who experience alterations feel unprepared to transition to practice. The findings can guide the training needed for PNSs before reentering clinical rotations or upon joining the workforce.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执照前护理专业学生对过渡到实践的认知准备情况
背景临床场所的限制对护士执照考前培训学生(PNSs)临床能力类别的影响尚不明确。目的描述在培训中经历改变的 PNSs 所感知的临床准备情况。CCQ 测量四类护理能力:(a)专业行为 (PB);(b)一般表现 (GP);(c)核心技能 (CS) 和(d)高级技能 (ANS)。总体感知能力平均分为 169 分(SD = 22,128-212)。PB、GP、CS和AS的平均分都很低。学生的 CS 和 AS 分数与改变课程的数量呈显著负相关(r = -.38,p = .008;r = -.35,p = .018),学生的 GP 分数与错过的临床天数呈显著反相关(r = -.32,p = .03)。这些发现可以为 PNS 在重新进入临床轮转或加入工作队伍前所需的培训提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Perception of caring behaviors of faculty members from the perspective of nursing students The Urgency of Teaching Theory in the Current Nursing Education Landscape OADN's Milestone Anniversary: Celebrating 40 Years of Advocacy, Education, and Leadership Nurse Educators’ Perspectives in Facilitating Ethics Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities in a pre-licensure nursing program to facilitate competency-based education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1