Short course irradiation in rectal cancer: Dosimetry study comparing 3D conformal radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy

Abstract

The standard radiotherapy planning technique for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) was 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT). Modern radiation delivery techniques, including Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) techniques, have been developed in recent years in terms of dose delivery to the target while minimizing the dose to the organ at risk (OAR). The objective of this study was to identify the most suitable treatment plan technique from the available options of 3DCRT, IMRT and VMAT for LARC using short course radiotherapy (SCRT). Therefore, twenty-five adult patients with LARC in the last five-year period (2017–2021) were involved in this study. For each patient, three radiotherapy treatment plans were generated for dosimetric comparison of short course irradiation (25 Gy/5 fractions, which is the new standard of care) using Varian Eclipse software to generate 3DCRT in comparison with IMRT and VMAT plans. The conformity index (CI), the homogeneity index (HI), and the organs at risk (OAR), including bladder, small bowel, and femoral heads, were compared between the three plans. The results revealed that VMAT and IMRT plans had a higher level of conformity for the planning target volume (PTV) with 0.996 and 0.994, respectively, compared to the 3DCRT planning of 0.947 (both p < 0.005). The PTV dose distribution was less homogeneous with 3DCRT than with VMAT or IMRT plans. VMAT offered superior homogeneity to IMRT and 3DCRT plans with 1.055, 1.066, and 1.089, respectively (p < 0.005). The findings showed that VMAT is superior to IMRT and 3DCRT in almost all parameters, including dose distribution conformity and homogeneity of the target volume, as well as providing better OAR sparing in LARC patients.