Lower bounds for the trade-off between bias and mean absolute deviation

IF 0.9 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistics & Probability Letters Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.spl.2024.110182
Alexis Derumigny , Johannes Schmidt-Hieber
{"title":"Lower bounds for the trade-off between bias and mean absolute deviation","authors":"Alexis Derumigny ,&nbsp;Johannes Schmidt-Hieber","doi":"10.1016/j.spl.2024.110182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In nonparametric statistics, rate-optimal estimators typically balance bias and stochastic error. The recent work on overparametrization raises the question whether rate-optimal estimators exist that do not obey this trade-off. In this work we consider pointwise estimation in the Gaussian white noise model with regression function <span><math><mi>f</mi></math></span> in a class of <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>-Hölder smooth functions. Let ’worst-case’ refer to the supremum over all functions <span><math><mi>f</mi></math></span> in the Hölder class. It is shown that any estimator with worst-case bias <span><math><mrow><mo>≲</mo><msup><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mi>β</mi><mo>/</mo><mrow><mo>(</mo><mn>2</mn><mi>β</mi><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo></mrow></mrow></msup><mo>≕</mo><msub><mrow><mi>ψ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> must necessarily also have a worst-case mean absolute deviation that is lower bounded by <span><math><mrow><mo>≳</mo><msub><mrow><mi>ψ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub><mo>.</mo></mrow></math></span> To derive the result, we establish abstract inequalities relating the change of expectation for two probability measures to the mean absolute deviation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49475,"journal":{"name":"Statistics & Probability Letters","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 110182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001512/pdfft?md5=51662c001093a4b55185099a04b71ff2&pid=1-s2.0-S0167715224001512-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics & Probability Letters","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224001512","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In nonparametric statistics, rate-optimal estimators typically balance bias and stochastic error. The recent work on overparametrization raises the question whether rate-optimal estimators exist that do not obey this trade-off. In this work we consider pointwise estimation in the Gaussian white noise model with regression function f in a class of β-Hölder smooth functions. Let ’worst-case’ refer to the supremum over all functions f in the Hölder class. It is shown that any estimator with worst-case bias nβ/(2β+1)ψn must necessarily also have a worst-case mean absolute deviation that is lower bounded by ψn. To derive the result, we establish abstract inequalities relating the change of expectation for two probability measures to the mean absolute deviation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偏差与平均绝对偏差之间权衡的下限
在非参数统计中,最优估计率通常会兼顾偏差和随机误差。最近关于超参数化的研究提出了一个问题:是否存在不服从这种权衡的最优估计率?在本研究中,我们将考虑在高斯白噪声模型中,用一类 β-Hölder 平滑函数中的回归函数 f 进行点估计。让 "最坏情况 "指的是 Hölder 类中所有函数 f 的上集。结果表明,任何具有最坏情况偏差≲n-β/(2β+1)≕ψn 的估计器,其最坏情况平均绝对偏差的下限必然也是≳ψn。为了推导出这一结果,我们建立了有关两个概率度量的期望变化与平均绝对偏差的抽象不等式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics & Probability Letters
Statistics & Probability Letters 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
173
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Statistics & Probability Letters adopts a novel and highly innovative approach to the publication of research findings in statistics and probability. It features concise articles, rapid publication and broad coverage of the statistics and probability literature. Statistics & Probability Letters is a refereed journal. Articles will be limited to six journal pages (13 double-space typed pages) including references and figures. Apart from the six-page limitation, originality, quality and clarity will be the criteria for choosing the material to be published in Statistics & Probability Letters. Every attempt will be made to provide the first review of a submitted manuscript within three months of submission. The proliferation of literature and long publication delays have made it difficult for researchers and practitioners to keep up with new developments outside of, or even within, their specialization. The aim of Statistics & Probability Letters is to help to alleviate this problem. Concise communications (letters) allow readers to quickly and easily digest large amounts of material and to stay up-to-date with developments in all areas of statistics and probability. The mainstream of Letters will focus on new statistical methods, theoretical results, and innovative applications of statistics and probability to other scientific disciplines. Key results and central ideas must be presented in a clear and concise manner. These results may be part of a larger study that the author will submit at a later time as a full length paper to SPL or to another journal. Theory and methodology may be published with proofs omitted, or only sketched, but only if sufficient support material is provided so that the findings can be verified. Empirical and computational results that are of significant value will be published.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board On testing mean of high dimensional compositional data Precise quantile function estimation from the characteristic function A jackknife empirical likelihood ratio test for log-symmetric distributions Efficient sampling in disease surveillance through subpopulations: Sampling canaries in the coal mine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1