Confidence is Good? too Much, not so Much: Exploring the effects on crowdfunding success

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114711
Naomi Moy , Ho Fai Chan , Felix Septianto , Frank Mathmann , Benno Torgler
{"title":"Confidence is Good? too Much, not so Much: Exploring the effects on crowdfunding success","authors":"Naomi Moy ,&nbsp;Ho Fai Chan ,&nbsp;Felix Septianto ,&nbsp;Frank Mathmann ,&nbsp;Benno Torgler","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Marketers take major risks to display confidence, based on the assumption that “more is always better”, yet the extant literature lacks adequate support for this notion. The present research proposes a novel conceptualization of the relationship between the confidence expressed in crowdfunding project descriptions and success, which is predicted to take an inverted U-shape. In this regard, the research draws upon the compensation effect identified between perceived competence and warmth, such that expressing high levels of confidence could decrease perceived warmth. As a result, there will be an optimal (moderate) level of confidence that determines successful fundraising outcomes – as measured by the number of contributors and amounts contributed. This prediction is tested by analyzing more than 71,000 Kickstarter projects (Study 1) and 1.3 million Kiva projects (Study 2, preregistered). A follow-up experiment (Study 3, preregistered) then establishes causality, demonstrating the role of perceived warmth and competence as the underlying mechanism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296324002157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marketers take major risks to display confidence, based on the assumption that “more is always better”, yet the extant literature lacks adequate support for this notion. The present research proposes a novel conceptualization of the relationship between the confidence expressed in crowdfunding project descriptions and success, which is predicted to take an inverted U-shape. In this regard, the research draws upon the compensation effect identified between perceived competence and warmth, such that expressing high levels of confidence could decrease perceived warmth. As a result, there will be an optimal (moderate) level of confidence that determines successful fundraising outcomes – as measured by the number of contributors and amounts contributed. This prediction is tested by analyzing more than 71,000 Kickstarter projects (Study 1) and 1.3 million Kiva projects (Study 2, preregistered). A follow-up experiment (Study 3, preregistered) then establishes causality, demonstrating the role of perceived warmth and competence as the underlying mechanism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自信是好事吗?探索对众筹成功的影响
基于 "越多越好 "的假设,营销人员冒着巨大风险展示信心,然而现有文献对这一概念缺乏足够的支持。本研究就众筹项目描述中表达的自信与成功之间的关系提出了一种新的概念,并预测这种关系呈倒 U 型。在这方面,本研究借鉴了感知能力与热情之间的补偿效应,即表达高度自信会降低感知热情。因此,会有一个最佳(适度)的自信水平来决定成功的筹款结果--以捐款人数和捐款金额来衡量。通过分析 71,000 多个 Kickstarter 项目(研究 1)和 130 万个 Kiva 项目(研究 2,预先注册),我们验证了这一预测。随后的后续实验(研究 3,预先注册)确定了因果关系,证明了感知到的温暖和能力作为潜在机制的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Energy Performance of Building Refurbishments: Predictive and Prescriptive AI-based Machine Learning Approaches Digital transformation along the supply chain: Spillover effects from vertical partnerships Bridging consumption and work: The effects of thoughts about different types of purchases on job-related motivations A meta-analytic investigation into the pay-it-forward phenomenon: The roles of individualism-collectivism and social distance The more, the better: The influence of overconfident CEOs on their firms’ digital orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1