Reduced dose helical CT scout imaging on next generation wide volume CT system decreases scan length and overall radiation exposure

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Radiology Open Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100578
Alexa E. Golbus , John L. Schuzer , Chloe Steveson , Shirley F. Rollison , James Matthews , Joseph Henry-Ellis , Marco Razeto , Marcus Y. Chen
{"title":"Reduced dose helical CT scout imaging on next generation wide volume CT system decreases scan length and overall radiation exposure","authors":"Alexa E. Golbus ,&nbsp;John L. Schuzer ,&nbsp;Chloe Steveson ,&nbsp;Shirley F. Rollison ,&nbsp;James Matthews ,&nbsp;Joseph Henry-Ellis ,&nbsp;Marco Razeto ,&nbsp;Marcus Y. Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Traditional CT acquisition planning is based on scout projection images from planar anterior-posterior and lateral projections where the radiographer estimates organ locations. Alternatively, a new scout method utilizing ultra-low dose helical CT (3D Landmark Scan) offers cross-sectional imaging to identify anatomic structures in conjunction with artificial intelligence based Anatomic Landmark Detection (ALD) for automatic CT acquisition planning. The purpose of this study is to quantify changes in scan length and radiation dose of CT examinations planned using 3D Landmark Scan and ALD and performed on next generation wide volume CT versus examinations planned using traditional scout methods. We additionally aim to quantify changes in radiation dose reduction of scans planned with 3D Landmark Scan and performed on next generation wide volume CT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with prior CT scan of the same organ who underwent clinical CT using 3D Landmark Scan and automatic scan planning. Acquisition length and dose-length-product (DLP) were collected. Data was analyzed by paired t-tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>104 total CT examinations (48.1 % chest, 15.4 % abdomen, 36.5 % chest/abdomen/pelvis) on 61 individual consecutive patients at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. 79.8 % of scans using 3D Landmark Scan had reduction in acquisition length compared to the respective prior acquisition. Median acquisition length using 3D Landmark Scan was 26.7 mm shorter than that using traditional scout methods (p &lt; 0.001) with a 23.3 % median total radiation dose reduction (245.6 (IQR 150.0–400.8) mGy cm vs 320.3 (IQR 184.1–547.9) mGy cm). CT dose index similarly was overall decreased for scans planned with 3D Landmark and ALD and performed on next generation CT versus traditional methods (4.85 (IQR 3.8–7) mGy vs. 6.70 (IQR 4.43–9.18) mGy, respectively, p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Scout imaging using reduced dose 3D Landmark Scan images and Anatomic Landmark Detection reduces acquisition range in chest, abdomen, and chest/abdomen/pelvis CT scans. This technology, in combination with next generation wide volume CT reduces total radiation dose.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000339/pdfft?md5=e5ed7f7f3246ee284cee1840d28083d1&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000339-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Traditional CT acquisition planning is based on scout projection images from planar anterior-posterior and lateral projections where the radiographer estimates organ locations. Alternatively, a new scout method utilizing ultra-low dose helical CT (3D Landmark Scan) offers cross-sectional imaging to identify anatomic structures in conjunction with artificial intelligence based Anatomic Landmark Detection (ALD) for automatic CT acquisition planning. The purpose of this study is to quantify changes in scan length and radiation dose of CT examinations planned using 3D Landmark Scan and ALD and performed on next generation wide volume CT versus examinations planned using traditional scout methods. We additionally aim to quantify changes in radiation dose reduction of scans planned with 3D Landmark Scan and performed on next generation wide volume CT.

Methods

Single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with prior CT scan of the same organ who underwent clinical CT using 3D Landmark Scan and automatic scan planning. Acquisition length and dose-length-product (DLP) were collected. Data was analyzed by paired t-tests.

Results

104 total CT examinations (48.1 % chest, 15.4 % abdomen, 36.5 % chest/abdomen/pelvis) on 61 individual consecutive patients at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. 79.8 % of scans using 3D Landmark Scan had reduction in acquisition length compared to the respective prior acquisition. Median acquisition length using 3D Landmark Scan was 26.7 mm shorter than that using traditional scout methods (p < 0.001) with a 23.3 % median total radiation dose reduction (245.6 (IQR 150.0–400.8) mGy cm vs 320.3 (IQR 184.1–547.9) mGy cm). CT dose index similarly was overall decreased for scans planned with 3D Landmark and ALD and performed on next generation CT versus traditional methods (4.85 (IQR 3.8–7) mGy vs. 6.70 (IQR 4.43–9.18) mGy, respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Scout imaging using reduced dose 3D Landmark Scan images and Anatomic Landmark Detection reduces acquisition range in chest, abdomen, and chest/abdomen/pelvis CT scans. This technology, in combination with next generation wide volume CT reduces total radiation dose.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下一代宽容积 CT 系统上的低剂量螺旋 CT 扫描成像减少了扫描长度和总体辐射暴露量
目的传统的 CT 采集计划是基于平面前后投影和侧面投影的探查投影图像,由放射技师估计器官位置。另一种方法是利用超低剂量螺旋 CT(三维地标扫描)提供横断面成像来识别解剖结构,并结合基于人工智能的解剖地标检测(ALD)来自动制定 CT 采集计划。本研究的目的是量化使用三维地标扫描和 ALD 计划并在下一代宽容积 CT 上进行的 CT 检查与使用传统扫描方法计划的检查在扫描长度和辐射剂量方面的变化。我们还旨在量化使用三维地标扫描计划并在下一代宽体 CT 上进行的扫描在减少辐射剂量方面的变化。方法对使用三维地标扫描和自动扫描计划进行临床 CT 扫描的连续患者进行单中心回顾性分析,这些患者之前接受过同一器官的 CT 扫描。收集了采集长度和剂量-长度-乘积(DLP)。结果对一个中心 61 名连续患者的 104 次 CT 检查(48.1% 胸部、15.4% 腹部、36.5% 胸部/腹部/骨盆)进行了回顾性分析。79.8%使用三维地标扫描的扫描与之前的扫描相比缩短了采集长度。使用三维地标扫描的中位采集长度比使用传统扫描方法缩短了 26.7 毫米(p < 0.001),中位总辐射剂量减少了 23.3%(245.6 (IQR 150.0-400.8) mGy cm vs 320.3 (IQR 184.1-547.9) mGy cm)。与传统方法相比,使用 3D Landmark 扫描和 ALD 计划并在下一代 CT 上进行的扫描的 CT 剂量指数总体上同样有所下降(分别为 4.85 (IQR 3.8-7) mGy vs. 6.70 (IQR 4.43-9.18) mGy,p < 0.001)。该技术与下一代宽容积 CT 结合使用可降低总辐射剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Deep learning model for diagnosis of thyroid nodules with size less than 1 cm: A multicenter, retrospective study MRI-based radiomics machine learning model to differentiate non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma from benign renal tumors Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates Study on the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using a multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning model True cost estimation of common imaging procedures for cost-effectiveness analysis - insights from a Singapore hospital emergency department
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1