Effect of prior beliefs and cognitive deficits on learning in first-episode schizophrenia patients

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2024.100318
Daniel Núñez , Javiera Rodríguez-Delgado , Ramón D. Castillo , José Yupanqui , Heidi Kloos
{"title":"Effect of prior beliefs and cognitive deficits on learning in first-episode schizophrenia patients","authors":"Daniel Núñez ,&nbsp;Javiera Rodríguez-Delgado ,&nbsp;Ramón D. Castillo ,&nbsp;José Yupanqui ,&nbsp;Heidi Kloos","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2024.100318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>It is known that cognitive deficits are a core feature of schizophrenia and that in the general population, prior beliefs significantly influence learning and reasoning processes. However, the interaction of prior beliefs with cognitive deficits and their impact on performance in schizophrenia patients is still poorly understood. This study investigates the role of beliefs and cognitive variables (CVs) like working memory, associative learning, and processing speed on learning processes in individuals with schizophrenia. We hypothesize that beliefs will influence the ability to learn correct predictions and that first-episode schizophrenia patients (FEP) will show impaired learning due to cognitive deficits.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a predictive-learning task to examine how FEP (<em>n</em> = 23) and matched controls (n = 23) adjusted their decisional criteria concerning physical properties during the learning process when predicting the sinking behavior of two transparent containers filled with aluminum discs when placed in water.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On accuracy, initial differences by group, trial type, and interaction effects of these variables disappeared when CVs were controlled. The differences by conditions, associated with differential beliefs about why the objects sink slower or faster, were seen in patients and controls, despite controlling the CVs' effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Differences between groups were mainly explained by CVs, proving that they play an important role than what is assumed in this type of task. However, beliefs about physical events were not affected by CVs, and beliefs affect in the same way the decisional criteria of the control or FEP patients' groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001324000192/pdfft?md5=724aa1494226fad4a9ea8aa278248c96&pid=1-s2.0-S2215001324000192-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001324000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

It is known that cognitive deficits are a core feature of schizophrenia and that in the general population, prior beliefs significantly influence learning and reasoning processes. However, the interaction of prior beliefs with cognitive deficits and their impact on performance in schizophrenia patients is still poorly understood. This study investigates the role of beliefs and cognitive variables (CVs) like working memory, associative learning, and processing speed on learning processes in individuals with schizophrenia. We hypothesize that beliefs will influence the ability to learn correct predictions and that first-episode schizophrenia patients (FEP) will show impaired learning due to cognitive deficits.

Methods

We used a predictive-learning task to examine how FEP (n = 23) and matched controls (n = 23) adjusted their decisional criteria concerning physical properties during the learning process when predicting the sinking behavior of two transparent containers filled with aluminum discs when placed in water.

Results

On accuracy, initial differences by group, trial type, and interaction effects of these variables disappeared when CVs were controlled. The differences by conditions, associated with differential beliefs about why the objects sink slower or faster, were seen in patients and controls, despite controlling the CVs' effect.

Conclusions

Differences between groups were mainly explained by CVs, proving that they play an important role than what is assumed in this type of task. However, beliefs about physical events were not affected by CVs, and beliefs affect in the same way the decisional criteria of the control or FEP patients' groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
既往信念和认知缺陷对首发精神分裂症患者学习的影响
导言:众所周知,认知缺陷是精神分裂症的一个核心特征,而在普通人群中,先验信念对学习和推理过程有重大影响。然而,人们对先前信念与认知缺陷之间的相互作用及其对精神分裂症患者表现的影响仍知之甚少。本研究探讨了信念和认知变量(CVs)(如工作记忆、联想学习和处理速度)对精神分裂症患者学习过程的作用。我们假设,信念会影响学习正确预测的能力,而首发精神分裂症患者(FEP)会因认知缺陷而表现出学习障碍。方法我们使用预测学习任务来研究 FEP(n = 23)和匹配的对照组(n = 23)在预测两个装满铝盘的透明容器放入水中后的下沉行为时,如何在学习过程中调整其有关物理特性的判定标准。结论组间差异主要由 CVs 解释,这证明 CVs 在这类任务中的作用比人们想象的要重要。然而,对物理事件的信念并没有受到 CVs 的影响,而信念对对照组或 FEP 患者组的决策标准的影响是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of dual-target rTMS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cerebellum in the treatment of negative symptoms in first-episode schizophrenia: Protocol for a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study Cognitive functioning and functional ability in women with schizophrenia and homelessness Humor processing and its relationship with clinical features in patients with first-episode schizophrenia Through the lens of schizophrenia: Recognizing negative facial expressions and family patterns Transcranial direct current stimulation and its effect on cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia: An updated review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1