Effect of different polishing methods on roughness and color stability of air-abraded restorative materials after artificial accelerated aging.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Mahmut S Ozdogan, Gokce Unsal, Kubra A Aydemir, Mine Tural, Filiz Aykent
{"title":"Effect of different polishing methods on roughness and color stability of air-abraded restorative materials after artificial accelerated aging.","authors":"Mahmut S Ozdogan, Gokce Unsal, Kubra A Aydemir, Mine Tural, Filiz Aykent","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of air abrasion and polishing procedures on roughness and color stability of ceramic and composite materials after artificial accelerated aging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, six restorative materials were tested: feldspathic ceramic (CEREC Blocks), glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD), resin-based hybrid ceramic (Cerasmart), microhybrid composite (Charisma Classic), nanohybrid composite (Charisma Diamond) and nanoceramic composite (CeramXOne). Forty square-shaped composite specimens were fabricated from each composite and CAD-CAM ceramic material. Initial surface roughness measurements were performed using a profilometer and color measurements of each specimen with a spectrophotometer. Ten control specimens for each group did not receive air abrasion. The other specimens were treated by an air abrasion device and then were randomly divided into three subgroups of 10 specimens (n= 10). After air abrasion, 10 specimens of each group did not receive polishing (Air abrasion group) and others were repolished with Sof-Lex kit (Sof-Lex group) or a rubber kit (Rubber group). Surface roughness and color measurements were repeated before and after 300 hours of artificial accelerated aging (AAA). The univariate test and then three-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were performed for comparison of groups (α= 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The univariate statistical analysis revealed that the restorative materials were differently affected after air abrasion, polishing methods and AAA (P< 0.001). Three-way ANOVA showed that the surface roughness of the restorative materials increased after air abrasion and AAA (P< 0.001). Two-way ANOVA showed statistically significant differences between color changes of ceramic (CEREC and IPS e.max CAD) and composite based restorative materials (P< 0.001).</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Clinicians should be aware that air abrasion at a specified power and time significantly changes the surface roughness of the materials except for CEREC. Additionally, polishing procedures (Sof-Lex, Rubber) did not significantly reduce the surface roughness of the ceramic groups. After air abrasion, depending on the material type used clinically, restorations should be repolished to reduce roughness and ensure color stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of air abrasion and polishing procedures on roughness and color stability of ceramic and composite materials after artificial accelerated aging.

Methods: In this study, six restorative materials were tested: feldspathic ceramic (CEREC Blocks), glass ceramic (IPS e.max CAD), resin-based hybrid ceramic (Cerasmart), microhybrid composite (Charisma Classic), nanohybrid composite (Charisma Diamond) and nanoceramic composite (CeramXOne). Forty square-shaped composite specimens were fabricated from each composite and CAD-CAM ceramic material. Initial surface roughness measurements were performed using a profilometer and color measurements of each specimen with a spectrophotometer. Ten control specimens for each group did not receive air abrasion. The other specimens were treated by an air abrasion device and then were randomly divided into three subgroups of 10 specimens (n= 10). After air abrasion, 10 specimens of each group did not receive polishing (Air abrasion group) and others were repolished with Sof-Lex kit (Sof-Lex group) or a rubber kit (Rubber group). Surface roughness and color measurements were repeated before and after 300 hours of artificial accelerated aging (AAA). The univariate test and then three-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were performed for comparison of groups (α= 0.05).

Results: The univariate statistical analysis revealed that the restorative materials were differently affected after air abrasion, polishing methods and AAA (P< 0.001). Three-way ANOVA showed that the surface roughness of the restorative materials increased after air abrasion and AAA (P< 0.001). Two-way ANOVA showed statistically significant differences between color changes of ceramic (CEREC and IPS e.max CAD) and composite based restorative materials (P< 0.001).

Clinical significance: Clinicians should be aware that air abrasion at a specified power and time significantly changes the surface roughness of the materials except for CEREC. Additionally, polishing procedures (Sof-Lex, Rubber) did not significantly reduce the surface roughness of the ceramic groups. After air abrasion, depending on the material type used clinically, restorations should be repolished to reduce roughness and ensure color stability.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同抛光方法对人工加速老化后气蚀修复材料粗糙度和颜色稳定性的影响
目的:评估气磨和抛光程序对人工加速老化后的陶瓷和复合材料的粗糙度和颜色稳定性的影响:本研究测试了六种修复材料:长石陶瓷(CEREC Blocks)、玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max CAD)、树脂基混合陶瓷(Cerasmart)、微混合复合材料(Charisma Classic)、纳米混合复合材料(Charisma Diamond)和纳米陶瓷复合材料(CeramXOne)。用每种复合材料和 CAD-CAM 陶瓷材料制作了 40 个正方形复合材料试样。使用轮廓仪对表面粗糙度进行初步测量,使用分光光度计对每个试样的颜色进行测量。每组有 10 个对照试样未进行气磨。其他试样经过气磨装置处理后,随机分为三组,每组 10 个试样(n= 10)。气磨后,每组 10 个试样不进行抛光(气磨组),其他试样使用 Sof-Lex 套件(Sof-Lex 组)或橡胶套件(橡胶组)重新抛光。在人工加速老化(AAA)300 小时前后,重复测量表面粗糙度和颜色。对各组进行单变量检验,然后进行三方方差分析和两方方差分析进行比较(α= 0.05):单变量统计分析显示,气磨、抛光方法和 AAA 对修复材料的影响不同(P< 0.001)。三方方差分析显示,气磨和 AAA 后,修复材料的表面粗糙度增加(P< 0.001)。双向方差分析显示,陶瓷(CEREC 和 IPS e.max CAD)和复合材料修复材料的颜色变化具有显著的统计学差异(P< 0.001):临床医生应注意,在特定功率和时间下进行的气磨会显著改变材料的表面粗糙度,但 CEREC 除外。此外,抛光程序(Sof-Lex、橡胶)也不会明显降低陶瓷组的表面粗糙度。气磨后,根据临床使用的材料类型,修复体应重新抛光,以减少粗糙度并确保颜色的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of polishing systems and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color stability of a single-shade resin composite. Charcoal dentifrices: A laboratory study of their safety and efficacy. Current landscape of research on whitening toothpastes and their effects on dental hard tissue. Effects of salivary contamination on the shear bond strengths of universal adhesives to dentin. Framework's marginal adaptation evaluation of fixed partial denture using conventional and digital impression techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1