Movement and Pressure Injury Prevention Care for Nursing Home Residents: Addressing the Nescience.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000165
Tracey L Yap, Jenny Alderden, Kais Gadhoumi, Susan D Horn, Sharon Eve Sonenblum, Judith C Hays, Susan M Kennerly
{"title":"Movement and Pressure Injury Prevention Care for Nursing Home Residents: Addressing the Nescience.","authors":"Tracey L Yap, Jenny Alderden, Kais Gadhoumi, Susan D Horn, Sharon Eve Sonenblum, Judith C Hays, Susan M Kennerly","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare movement associated with position changes among nursing home residents who remain in lying versus upright positions for more than 2 hours and among residents living with obesity, dementia, or neither condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a descriptive exploratory study using secondary data (N = 934) from the Turn Everyone And Move for Ulcer Prevention (TEAM-UP) clinical trial to examine transient movements (<60 seconds) within prolonged periods of 2 to 5 hours without repositioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing home residents exhibit significantly more episodic transient movements when upright than lying. Residents with obesity or dementia exhibited similar frequencies of episodic transient movements compared with residents with neither obesity nor dementia. Upright or lying movements were more frequent among residents with obesity than among those with neither obesity nor dementia selectively when prolonged events ranged from 2 to 4 hours. Pairwise comparisons of movement rates among resident subgroups (living with obesity, living with dementia, or neither group) across repositioning intervals showed episodic transient movements were significantly higher across all subgroups for repositioning intervals up to 3 hours when compared with repositioning intervals of greater than 3 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings challenge assumptions that nursing home residents are inactive and at risk for prolonged sitting. These preliminary findings, along with TEAM-UP findings where no pressure injuries occurred in up to 5 hours in prolonged positions, support establishing a standard 3-hour repositioning interval with use of high-density mattresses without a negative impact on pressure injury occurrence. There should be caution when considering repositioning intervals greater than 3 hours. Further research is indicated to explore protective effect of episodic transient movements of other subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"37 7","pages":"369-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11207196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare movement associated with position changes among nursing home residents who remain in lying versus upright positions for more than 2 hours and among residents living with obesity, dementia, or neither condition.

Methods: The authors conducted a descriptive exploratory study using secondary data (N = 934) from the Turn Everyone And Move for Ulcer Prevention (TEAM-UP) clinical trial to examine transient movements (<60 seconds) within prolonged periods of 2 to 5 hours without repositioning.

Results: Nursing home residents exhibit significantly more episodic transient movements when upright than lying. Residents with obesity or dementia exhibited similar frequencies of episodic transient movements compared with residents with neither obesity nor dementia. Upright or lying movements were more frequent among residents with obesity than among those with neither obesity nor dementia selectively when prolonged events ranged from 2 to 4 hours. Pairwise comparisons of movement rates among resident subgroups (living with obesity, living with dementia, or neither group) across repositioning intervals showed episodic transient movements were significantly higher across all subgroups for repositioning intervals up to 3 hours when compared with repositioning intervals of greater than 3 hours.

Conclusions: Findings challenge assumptions that nursing home residents are inactive and at risk for prolonged sitting. These preliminary findings, along with TEAM-UP findings where no pressure injuries occurred in up to 5 hours in prolonged positions, support establishing a standard 3-hour repositioning interval with use of high-density mattresses without a negative impact on pressure injury occurrence. There should be caution when considering repositioning intervals greater than 3 hours. Further research is indicated to explore protective effect of episodic transient movements of other subgroups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
养老院住户的运动和压伤预防护理:解决科学难题。
摘要比较养老院居民在保持卧姿和直立姿势超过 2 小时后,以及在患有肥胖症、痴呆症或两种病症的居民中,与体位变化相关的运动情况:作者利用 "预防溃疡的翻身和移动"(TEAM-UP)临床试验的二手数据(N = 934)进行了一项描述性探索研究,以检查瞬时运动(结果:护理院居民的瞬时运动明显多于直立体位的居民:养老院居民直立时的偶发性瞬时运动明显多于躺卧时。与既无肥胖症也无痴呆症的居民相比,患有肥胖症或痴呆症的居民表现出相似的偶发性瞬时运动频率。在持续时间为 2 到 4 小时的情况下,肥胖症患者直立或躺卧的运动频率要高于既无肥胖症也无痴呆症的患者。对居民亚组(肥胖症、痴呆症或两组均无)在不同重新定位时间间隔内的运动率进行配对比较后发现,在所有亚组中,重新定位时间间隔不超过3小时的偶发瞬时运动明显高于重新定位时间间隔超过3小时的运动:研究结果对养老院居民不爱活动和有久坐风险的假设提出了质疑。这些初步研究结果以及 TEAM-UP 的研究结果表明,在长达 5 小时的长时间体位中未发生压伤,这支持在使用高密度床垫的情况下确定 3 小时的标准体位调整间隔,而不会对压伤的发生产生负面影响。在考虑超过 3 小时的调整间隔时应谨慎。需要进一步开展研究,探索其他亚组的偶发性短暂移动的保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Indices of Topical Antiseptics in Wound Care: A Systematic Review. Omega Fatty Acid-Based Therapy for Healing of Recalcitrant Wounds in Patients with Complex Comorbidities. A Catheter Securement Strategy for Patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa. Examining the Effect of Oral Health on Nutrition Status and Wound Healing. Healing with Systematic Wound Management after Minimally Invasive Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1