Botulinum Toxin-A for the Treatment of Myogenous Temporomandibular Disorders: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

IF 13 1区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drugs Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1007/s40265-024-02048-x
Giancarlo De la Torre Canales, Mariana Barbosa Câmara-Souza, Malin Ernberg, Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi, Anastasios Grigoriadis, Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha, Maria Christidis, Hajer Jasim, Anna Lövgren, Nikolaos Christidis
{"title":"Botulinum Toxin-A for the Treatment of Myogenous Temporomandibular Disorders: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Giancarlo De la Torre Canales, Mariana Barbosa Câmara-Souza, Malin Ernberg, Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi, Anastasios Grigoriadis, Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha, Maria Christidis, Hajer Jasim, Anna Lövgren, Nikolaos Christidis","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02048-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) encompass several conditions that cause pain and impair function of the masticatory muscles (M-TMDs) and temporomandibular joints. There is a large interest among clinicians and researchers in the use of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) as a treatment for M-TMD. However, due to the lack of consistent evidence regarding the efficacy as well as adverse events of BoNT-A, clinical decision making is challenging. Therefore, this umbrella review aimed to systematically assess systematic reviews (SRs) evaluating BoNT-A treatment effects on pain intensity, mandibular movements, and adverse events in patients with M-TMDs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An electronic search was undertaken in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP to identify SRs investigating BoNT-A effects on M-TMDs, published from the inception of each database until 6 December 2023. The quality of evidence was rated according to the critical appraisal checklist developed by the umbrella review methodology working group. Only high-quality SRs were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18 SRs were included. BoNT-A was shown to be more effective than placebo to reduce pain intensity, but not compared to standard treatments. Additionally, BoNT-A was not superior to placebo or standard treatments regarding improvement of mandibular movements. BoNT-A was considered to have a higher risk for adverse events on muscle and bony tissue compared with other treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The synthesis in this umbrella review provides the highest level of evidence present. Taken together, there are indications of effectiveness of BoNT-A for treatment of M-TMDs, supported by moderate evidence. However, considering the risk of causing serious adverse events, treatment with BoNT-A is recommended to be the last treatment alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02048-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) encompass several conditions that cause pain and impair function of the masticatory muscles (M-TMDs) and temporomandibular joints. There is a large interest among clinicians and researchers in the use of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) as a treatment for M-TMD. However, due to the lack of consistent evidence regarding the efficacy as well as adverse events of BoNT-A, clinical decision making is challenging. Therefore, this umbrella review aimed to systematically assess systematic reviews (SRs) evaluating BoNT-A treatment effects on pain intensity, mandibular movements, and adverse events in patients with M-TMDs.

Method: An electronic search was undertaken in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP to identify SRs investigating BoNT-A effects on M-TMDs, published from the inception of each database until 6 December 2023. The quality of evidence was rated according to the critical appraisal checklist developed by the umbrella review methodology working group. Only high-quality SRs were included.

Results: In total, 18 SRs were included. BoNT-A was shown to be more effective than placebo to reduce pain intensity, but not compared to standard treatments. Additionally, BoNT-A was not superior to placebo or standard treatments regarding improvement of mandibular movements. BoNT-A was considered to have a higher risk for adverse events on muscle and bony tissue compared with other treatments.

Conclusion: The synthesis in this umbrella review provides the highest level of evidence present. Taken together, there are indications of effectiveness of BoNT-A for treatment of M-TMDs, supported by moderate evidence. However, considering the risk of causing serious adverse events, treatment with BoNT-A is recommended to be the last treatment alternative.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗肌源性颞下颌关节紊乱症的肉毒杆菌毒素 A:系统综述》。
目的:颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMDs)包括多种会引起疼痛并损害咀嚼肌(M-TMDs)和颞下颌关节功能的疾病。临床医生和研究人员对使用肉毒杆菌毒素-A(BoNT-A)治疗 M-TMD 非常感兴趣。然而,由于缺乏有关 BoNT-A 疗效和不良反应的一致证据,临床决策具有挑战性。因此,本综述旨在系统评估评价 BoNT-A 治疗对 M-TMDs 患者的疼痛强度、下颌运动和不良事件影响的系统性综述(SR):在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Cochrane 对照试验中央登记处 (CENTRAL)、Web of Science、Epistemonikos、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 ICTRP 等数据库中进行电子检索,以确定自各数据库建立之初至 2023 年 12 月 6 日期间发表的研究 BoNT-A 对 M-TMDs 影响的 SR。证据质量根据伞式综述方法工作组制定的关键评估清单进行评分。结果:结果:共纳入了 18 篇研究报告。研究表明,BoNT-A 在降低疼痛强度方面比安慰剂更有效,但与标准治疗方法相比效果不佳。此外,在改善下颌运动方面,BoNT-A 也不优于安慰剂或标准疗法。与其他治疗方法相比,BoNT-A 被认为对肌肉和骨骼组织产生不良反应的风险较高:本综述提供了目前最高水平的证据。综合来看,有迹象表明 BoNT-A 对治疗 M-TMDs 有效,并有中等程度的证据支持。然而,考虑到引起严重不良事件的风险,建议将 BoNT-A 作为最后的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs
Drugs 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
134
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs is a journal that aims to enhance pharmacotherapy by publishing review and original research articles on key aspects of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. The journal includes: Leading/current opinion articles providing an overview of contentious or emerging issues. Definitive reviews of drugs and drug classes, and their place in disease management. Therapy in Practice articles including recommendations for specific clinical situations. High-quality, well designed, original clinical research. Adis Drug Evaluations reviewing the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs. AdisInsight Reports summarising development at first global approval. Moreover, the journal offers additional digital features such as animated abstracts, video abstracts, instructional videos, and podcasts to increase visibility and educational value. Plain language summaries accompany articles to assist readers with some knowledge of the field in understanding important medical advances.
期刊最新文献
Efgartigimod: A Review in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis. Update on Mpox Management: Epidemiology, Vaccines and Therapeutics, and Regulatory Changes. Vunakizumab: First Approval. 2024 Recommendations on the Optimal Use of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Established Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Following Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Position Paper of the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP). The Challenge of Treating Infections Caused by Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1