Phonological neighbors cooperate during spoken-sentence processing: Evidence from a nonword detection task

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY Attention Perception & Psychophysics Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.3758/s13414-024-02913-7
Sophie Dufour, Colas Fournet, Jonathan Mirault, Jonathan Grainger
{"title":"Phonological neighbors cooperate during spoken-sentence processing: Evidence from a nonword detection task","authors":"Sophie Dufour,&nbsp;Colas Fournet,&nbsp;Jonathan Mirault,&nbsp;Jonathan Grainger","doi":"10.3758/s13414-024-02913-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We used a novel nonword detection task to examine the lexical competition principle postulated in most models of spoken word recognition. To do so, in Experiment 1 we presented sequences of spoken words with half of the sequences containing a nonword, and the target nonword (i.e., press a response key whenever you detect a nonword in the sequence) could either be phonologically related (a phonological neighbor) or unrelated to the immediately preceding word. We reasoned that the reactivation of a phonological neighbor during target nonword processing should delay the moment at which a nonword decision can be made. Contrary to our hypothesis, participants were faster at detecting nonwords when they were preceded by a phonological neighbor compared with an unrelated word. In Experiment 2, an inhibitory effect of phonological relatedness on nonword decisions was observed in a classic priming situation using the same set of related and unrelated word-nonword pairs. We discuss the implications of these findings in regard to the main models of spoken word recognition, and conclude that our specific experimental set-up with phonological neighbors embedded in spoken sentences is more sensitive to cooperative interactions between co-activated sublexical representations than lexical competition between co-activated lexical representations, with the latter being modulated by whether or not the words compete for the same slot in time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"86 5","pages":"1735 - 1745"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-024-02913-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used a novel nonword detection task to examine the lexical competition principle postulated in most models of spoken word recognition. To do so, in Experiment 1 we presented sequences of spoken words with half of the sequences containing a nonword, and the target nonword (i.e., press a response key whenever you detect a nonword in the sequence) could either be phonologically related (a phonological neighbor) or unrelated to the immediately preceding word. We reasoned that the reactivation of a phonological neighbor during target nonword processing should delay the moment at which a nonword decision can be made. Contrary to our hypothesis, participants were faster at detecting nonwords when they were preceded by a phonological neighbor compared with an unrelated word. In Experiment 2, an inhibitory effect of phonological relatedness on nonword decisions was observed in a classic priming situation using the same set of related and unrelated word-nonword pairs. We discuss the implications of these findings in regard to the main models of spoken word recognition, and conclude that our specific experimental set-up with phonological neighbors embedded in spoken sentences is more sensitive to cooperative interactions between co-activated sublexical representations than lexical competition between co-activated lexical representations, with the latter being modulated by whether or not the words compete for the same slot in time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在口语-句子处理过程中,音素邻近词相互配合:来自非词检测任务的证据
我们使用了一项新颖的非词检测任务来检验大多数口语单词识别模型所假设的词性竞争原理。为此,我们在实验 1 中呈现了口语单词序列,其中一半序列包含一个非单词,目标非单词(即每当检测到序列中的非单词时按下响应键)既可以与紧接着的单词在语音上相关(语音邻接),也可以与之无关。我们推断,在目标非词处理过程中,音素邻近词的重新激活应该会延迟做出非词决定的时间。与我们的假设相反,与不相关的词相比,当非词前面有一个音素邻接词时,参与者检测非词的速度更快。在实验 2 中,我们使用了同样一组相关和不相关的词-非词对,在经典引物情境中观察到了语音相关性对非词决策的抑制作用。我们讨论了这些发现对口语单词识别主要模型的影响,并得出结论:我们在口语句子中嵌入音素邻近词的特定实验设置对共同激活的次词汇表征之间的合作互动比共同激活的词汇表征之间的词汇竞争更敏感,后者受单词是否竞争同一时间段的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
期刊最新文献
Target selection during "snapshot" foraging. Disentangling decision errors from action execution in mouse-tracking studies: The case of effect-based action control. Parafoveal N400 effects reveal that word skipping is associated with deeper lexical processing in the presence of context-driven expectations. Correction to: On the relationship between spatial attention and semantics in the context of a Stroop paradigm. Can the left hand benefit from being right? The influence of body side on perceived grasping ability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1