Trusting the trust machine: How does blockchain-enabled governance configuration enhance financing credibility?

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103061
Hua Song , Wenyi Liu , Kangkang Yu , Mengwei Han
{"title":"Trusting the trust machine: How does blockchain-enabled governance configuration enhance financing credibility?","authors":"Hua Song ,&nbsp;Wenyi Liu ,&nbsp;Kangkang Yu ,&nbsp;Mengwei Han","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study highlights the role of blockchain technology in addressing the trust crisis in supply chain operations and financial activities. While previous research has acknowledged blockchain as a response to trust issues, limited studies have explored its specific contributions and its impact on accelerating cash flow in supply chains. Drawing on governance theory, this study investigates the relationship between blockchain technology and supply chain finance (SCF) through multiple case studies. The central argument is that blockchain technology alone does not automatically generate trust. Instead, trust is established through the configuration of various governance mechanisms. We propose that trust in blockchain applications is derived from two main factors: the requirement of codifiability and verifiability. Through a cross-case analysis, we found that in situations where both the requirement of codifiability and verifiability are high, blockchain governance tends to dominate. When only one factor is high, a configuration of blockchain governance and relational governance emerges. When both factors are low, contractual governance proves to be efficient. This study underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of trust dynamics in blockchain applications and highlights the importance of considering contextual factors in trust research related to blockchain technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 103061"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study highlights the role of blockchain technology in addressing the trust crisis in supply chain operations and financial activities. While previous research has acknowledged blockchain as a response to trust issues, limited studies have explored its specific contributions and its impact on accelerating cash flow in supply chains. Drawing on governance theory, this study investigates the relationship between blockchain technology and supply chain finance (SCF) through multiple case studies. The central argument is that blockchain technology alone does not automatically generate trust. Instead, trust is established through the configuration of various governance mechanisms. We propose that trust in blockchain applications is derived from two main factors: the requirement of codifiability and verifiability. Through a cross-case analysis, we found that in situations where both the requirement of codifiability and verifiability are high, blockchain governance tends to dominate. When only one factor is high, a configuration of blockchain governance and relational governance emerges. When both factors are low, contractual governance proves to be efficient. This study underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of trust dynamics in blockchain applications and highlights the importance of considering contextual factors in trust research related to blockchain technology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任信任机器:区块链支持的治理配置如何提高融资可信度?
本研究强调了区块链技术在解决供应链运营和金融活动中的信任危机方面的作用。虽然以往的研究承认区块链是解决信任问题的一种对策,但探讨其具体贡献及其对加快供应链现金流的影响的研究却很有限。本研究借鉴治理理论,通过多个案例研究,探讨区块链技术与供应链金融(SCF)之间的关系。核心论点是,区块链技术本身不会自动产生信任。相反,信任是通过各种治理机制的配置建立起来的。我们提出,区块链应用中的信任来源于两个主要因素:可编码性和可验证性要求。通过交叉案例分析,我们发现在可编码性和可验证性要求都很高的情况下,区块链治理往往占据主导地位。当只有一个因素较高时,就会出现区块链治理和关系治理的组合。当两个因素都较低时,合同治理被证明是有效的。这项研究强调了对区块链应用中的信任动态进行细致理解的必要性,并突出了在与区块链技术有关的信任研究中考虑背景因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Capturing the breadth of value creation with science fiction storytelling: Evidence from smart service design workshops A classification framework for generative artificial intelligence for social good Digital technology and innovation:The impact of blockchain application on enterprise innovation Exploring and investigating the complementarity and multidimensionality of innovation for sustainability research: Past present and future Facilitator or figurehead? The impact of academician shareholder on corporate innovation: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1