The statistics of cognitive variability: Explaining common patterns in individuals, groups and financial markets

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105858
Jian-Qiao Zhu , Jake Spicer , Adam Sanborn , Nick Chater
{"title":"The statistics of cognitive variability: Explaining common patterns in individuals, groups and financial markets","authors":"Jian-Qiao Zhu ,&nbsp;Jake Spicer ,&nbsp;Adam Sanborn ,&nbsp;Nick Chater","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Psychological variability (i.e., “noise”) displays interesting structure which is hidden by the common practice of averaging over trials. Interesting noise structure, termed ‘stylized facts’, is observed in financial markets (i.e., behaviors from many thousands of traders). Here we investigate the parallels between psychological and financial time series. In a series of three experiments (total <em>N</em> <em>=</em> <em>202</em>), we successively simplified a market-based price prediction task by first removing external information, and then removing any interaction between participants. Finally, we removed any resemblance to an asset market by asking individual participants to simply reproduce temporal intervals. All three experiments reproduced the main stylized facts found in financial markets, and the robustness of the results suggests that a common cognitive-level mechanism can produce them. We identify one potential model based on mental sampling algorithms, showing how this general-purpose model might account for behavior across these very different tasks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001446/pdfft?md5=cf090b35b7ad29f44437b6f38055aed4&pid=1-s2.0-S0010027724001446-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027724001446","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psychological variability (i.e., “noise”) displays interesting structure which is hidden by the common practice of averaging over trials. Interesting noise structure, termed ‘stylized facts’, is observed in financial markets (i.e., behaviors from many thousands of traders). Here we investigate the parallels between psychological and financial time series. In a series of three experiments (total N = 202), we successively simplified a market-based price prediction task by first removing external information, and then removing any interaction between participants. Finally, we removed any resemblance to an asset market by asking individual participants to simply reproduce temporal intervals. All three experiments reproduced the main stylized facts found in financial markets, and the robustness of the results suggests that a common cognitive-level mechanism can produce them. We identify one potential model based on mental sampling algorithms, showing how this general-purpose model might account for behavior across these very different tasks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知变异统计:解释个人、群体和金融市场的共同模式
心理变异(即 "噪音")显示出有趣的结构,而这种结构却被对试验进行平均的常见做法所掩盖。在金融市场(即成千上万交易者的行为)中也能观察到有趣的噪音结构,即 "风格化事实"。在此,我们研究了心理和金融时间序列之间的相似之处。在三个系列的实验中(总人数 = 202),我们先后简化了基于市场的价格预测任务,首先去除外部信息,然后去除参与者之间的任何互动。最后,我们消除了与资产市场的任何相似之处,要求单个参与者简单地再现时间间隔。所有这三个实验都再现了金融市场中发现的主要典型事实,而结果的稳健性表明,一个共同的认知层面机制可以产生这些事实。我们确定了一种基于心理取样算法的潜在模型,并展示了这种通用模型如何解释这些截然不同的任务中的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
Impact of conflicts between long- and short-term priors on the weighted prior integration in visual perception Predicting large-scale spatial ability from small-scale spatial abilities in children: An application of the double-dimension framework Motor inhibition prevents motor execution during typing imagery: Evidence from an action-mode switching paradigm Blending simulation and abstraction for physical reasoning On the role of analytic thinking in religious belief change: Evidence from over 50,000 participants in 16 countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1