Comparison of caffeine consumption behavior with plasma caffeine levels as exposure measures in drug-target mendelian randomization.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae143
Benjamin Woolf, Héléne T Cronjé, Loukas Zagkos, Susanna C Larsson, Dipender Gill, Stephen Burgess
{"title":"Comparison of caffeine consumption behavior with plasma caffeine levels as exposure measures in drug-target mendelian randomization.","authors":"Benjamin Woolf, Héléne T Cronjé, Loukas Zagkos, Susanna C Larsson, Dipender Gill, Stephen Burgess","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mendelian randomization is an epidemiologic technique that can explore the potential effect of perturbing a pharmacological target. Plasma caffeine levels can be used as a biomarker to measure the pharmacological effects of caffeine. Alternatively, this can be assessed using a behavioral proxy, such as average number of caffeinated drinks consumed per day. Either variable can be used as the exposure in a Mendelian randomization investigation, and to select which genetic variants to use as instrumental variables. Another possibility is to choose variants in gene regions with known biological relevance to caffeine level regulation. These choices affect the causal question that is being addressed by the analysis, and the validity of the analysis assumptions. Further, even when using the same genetic variants, the sign of Mendelian randomization estimates (positive or negative) can change depending on the choice of exposure. Some genetic variants that decrease caffeine metabolism associate with higher levels of plasma caffeine, but lower levels of caffeine consumption, as individuals with these variants require less caffeine consumption for the same physiological effect. We explore Mendelian randomization estimates for the effect of caffeine on body mass index, and discuss implications for variant and exposure choice in drug target Mendelian randomization investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1776-1784"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mendelian randomization is an epidemiologic technique that can explore the potential effect of perturbing a pharmacological target. Plasma caffeine levels can be used as a biomarker to measure the pharmacological effects of caffeine. Alternatively, this can be assessed using a behavioral proxy, such as average number of caffeinated drinks consumed per day. Either variable can be used as the exposure in a Mendelian randomization investigation, and to select which genetic variants to use as instrumental variables. Another possibility is to choose variants in gene regions with known biological relevance to caffeine level regulation. These choices affect the causal question that is being addressed by the analysis, and the validity of the analysis assumptions. Further, even when using the same genetic variants, the sign of Mendelian randomization estimates (positive or negative) can change depending on the choice of exposure. Some genetic variants that decrease caffeine metabolism associate with higher levels of plasma caffeine, but lower levels of caffeine consumption, as individuals with these variants require less caffeine consumption for the same physiological effect. We explore Mendelian randomization estimates for the effect of caffeine on body mass index, and discuss implications for variant and exposure choice in drug target Mendelian randomization investigations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将咖啡因摄入行为与血浆咖啡因水平作为药物-目标孟德尔随机化的暴露测量指标进行比较。
孟德尔随机化是一种流行病学技术,可以探索扰动药理目标的潜在影响。血浆咖啡因水平可作为生物标记物来衡量咖啡因的药理效应。或者,也可以使用行为替代物进行评估,如每天饮用含咖啡因饮料的平均次数。这两种变量都可以用作孟德尔随机调查中的暴露变量,并选择哪些基因变异作为工具变量。另一种可能性是选择已知与咖啡因水平调节具有生物学相关性的基因区域中的变异。这些选择会影响分析所要解决的因果问题以及分析假设的有效性。此外,即使使用相同的基因变异,孟德尔随机化估计值的符号(正或负)也会因暴露的选择而改变。一些降低咖啡因代谢的基因变异与较高的血浆咖啡因水平有关,但咖啡因消耗水平较低,因为具有这些变异的个体需要消耗较少的咖啡因才能达到相同的生理效应。我们探讨了咖啡因对体重指数影响的孟德尔随机化估计值,并讨论了药物目标孟德尔随机化研究中变体和暴露选择的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Methods for estimating beneficiary populations targeted by health and nutrition interventions for women, pregnant women, infants, and young children. A novel approach for inferring effects on pregnancy loss. Accounting for local incidence when estimating rotavirus vaccine efficacy among countries: a pooled analysis of monovalent rotavirus vaccine trials. Adjusting for Selection Bias Due to Missing Eligibility Criteria in Emulated Target Trials. Ambient temperature and deaths from homicide in Brazil during 2010-2019: A nationwide space-time-stratified case-crossover study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1