Prior infections and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in test-negative studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae142
Tim K Tsang, Sheena G Sullivan, Xiaotong Huang, Can Wang, Yifan Wang, Joshua Nealon, Bingyi Yang, Kylie E C Ainslie, Benjamin J Cowling
{"title":"Prior infections and effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in test-negative studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Tim K Tsang, Sheena G Sullivan, Xiaotong Huang, Can Wang, Yifan Wang, Joshua Nealon, Bingyi Yang, Kylie E C Ainslie, Benjamin J Cowling","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 can provide protection against infection and severe COVID-19. We aimed to determine the impact of preexisting immunity on vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed 66 test-negative design studies that examined VE against infection or severe disease (hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or death) for primary vaccination series. Pooled VE among studies that included people with prior COVID-19 infection was lower against infection (77%; 95% CI, 72-81) and severe disease (86%; 95% CI, 83-89) compared with studies that excluded people with prior COVID-19 infection (pooled VE against infection: 87% [95% CI, 85-89]; pooled VE against severe disease: 93% [95% CI, 91-95]). There was a negative correlation between VE estimates against infection and severe disease, and the cumulative incidence of cases before the start of the study or incidence rates during the study period. We found clear empirical evidence that higher levels of preexisting immunity were associated with lower VE estimates. Prior infections should be treated as both a confounder and effect modificatory when the policies target the whole population or are stratified by infection history, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1868-1881"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11637527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior infection with SARS-CoV-2 can provide protection against infection and severe COVID-19. We aimed to determine the impact of preexisting immunity on vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed 66 test-negative design studies that examined VE against infection or severe disease (hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or death) for primary vaccination series. Pooled VE among studies that included people with prior COVID-19 infection was lower against infection (77%; 95% CI, 72-81) and severe disease (86%; 95% CI, 83-89) compared with studies that excluded people with prior COVID-19 infection (pooled VE against infection: 87% [95% CI, 85-89]; pooled VE against severe disease: 93% [95% CI, 91-95]). There was a negative correlation between VE estimates against infection and severe disease, and the cumulative incidence of cases before the start of the study or incidence rates during the study period. We found clear empirical evidence that higher levels of preexisting immunity were associated with lower VE estimates. Prior infections should be treated as both a confounder and effect modificatory when the policies target the whole population or are stratified by infection history, respectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试验阴性研究中的既往感染与 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
之前感染过 SARS-CoV-2 可为感染和严重 COVID-19 提供保护。我们的目的是确定既往免疫对疫苗有效性(VE)估计值的影响。我们对 66 项检测阴性设计 (TND) 的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,这些研究考察了接种初级疫苗系列对感染或严重疾病(住院、入住重症监护室或死亡)的保护率。与排除 COVID-19 既往感染者的研究相比,纳入 COVID-19 既往感染者的研究针对感染的总有效率(总有效率:77%;95% 置信区间 (CI):72%, 81%)和针对严重疾病的总有效率(总有效率:86%;95% CI:83%, 89%)较低(针对感染的总有效率:87%;95% CI:85%, 89%;针对严重疾病的总有效率:93%;95% CI:95%):93%;95% CI:91%,95%)。针对感染和严重疾病的 VE 估计值与研究开始前的累计发病率或研究期间的发病率之间呈负相关。我们发现,有明确的经验证据表明,较高的既往免疫水平与较低的 VE 估计值相关。当政策分别针对整个人群或按感染史分层时,先前感染应被视为混杂因素和效应调节因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Comparison of caffeine consumption behavior with plasma caffeine levels as exposure measures in drug-target mendelian randomization. Multimorbidity patterns, sociodemographic characteristics, and mortality: Data science insights from low-resource settings. Non-Fatal Suicidal Self-Directed Violence among U.S. Veterans (2022): The Assessing Social and Community Environments with National Data (ASCEND) for Veteran Suicide Prevention Study. A hypothetical intervention on the use of hearing aids for the risk of dementia in people with hearing loss in UK Biobank. Labor and delivery unit practices and racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous individuals with low-risk pregnancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1