Effects of US state paid family leave policies on perinatal and postpartum health: a quasi-experimental analysis.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2026-01-08 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwaf010
Whitney M Wells, Justin S White, Daniel F Collin, Guangyi Wang, Sepideh Modrek, Rita Hamad
{"title":"Effects of US state paid family leave policies on perinatal and postpartum health: a quasi-experimental analysis.","authors":"Whitney M Wells, Justin S White, Daniel F Collin, Guangyi Wang, Sepideh Modrek, Rita Hamad","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States is the only high-income country without a national paid family leave (PFL) policy, although several states have implemented policies recently. This study evaluated whether PFL policies in 6 states improved maternal and infant health. We used difference-in-differences, a quasi-experimental approach, to estimate the impact of state-level policy implementation. We leveraged recently developed methods designed to account for staggered policy implementation and treatment effect heterogeneity. Data were drawn from the 2004-2021 waves of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Primary outcomes included breastfeeding, maternal postpartum depressive symptoms, and attendance at a postpartum checkup; secondary outcomes included birth outcomes. Multivariable regressions were adjusted for possible confounders. PFL policies led to increased breastfeeding duration (0.53 weeks; 95% CI, 0.06-0.99) and decreased depressive symptoms (-0.93 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.84 to -0.01). Policies were also associated with worsening of some birth outcomes, possibly reflecting selection in utero, data limitations, or true negative effects. Estimates were largely robust to alternative specifications, with subgroup differences by race/ethnicity and income. This study adds important evidence on the health effects of state-level PFL policies at a critical point when many states are considering or enacting policies and during ongoing conversations about national PFL policy implementation. This article is part of a Special Collection on Methods in Social Epidemiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"246-254"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States is the only high-income country without a national paid family leave (PFL) policy, although several states have implemented policies recently. This study evaluated whether PFL policies in 6 states improved maternal and infant health. We used difference-in-differences, a quasi-experimental approach, to estimate the impact of state-level policy implementation. We leveraged recently developed methods designed to account for staggered policy implementation and treatment effect heterogeneity. Data were drawn from the 2004-2021 waves of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Primary outcomes included breastfeeding, maternal postpartum depressive symptoms, and attendance at a postpartum checkup; secondary outcomes included birth outcomes. Multivariable regressions were adjusted for possible confounders. PFL policies led to increased breastfeeding duration (0.53 weeks; 95% CI, 0.06-0.99) and decreased depressive symptoms (-0.93 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.84 to -0.01). Policies were also associated with worsening of some birth outcomes, possibly reflecting selection in utero, data limitations, or true negative effects. Estimates were largely robust to alternative specifications, with subgroup differences by race/ethnicity and income. This study adds important evidence on the health effects of state-level PFL policies at a critical point when many states are considering or enacting policies and during ongoing conversations about national PFL policy implementation. This article is part of a Special Collection on Methods in Social Epidemiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国国家带薪家庭假政策对围产期和产后健康的影响:一项准实验分析。
美国是唯一一个没有全国性带薪家庭假(PFL)政策的高收入国家,尽管最近有几个州实施了相关政策。本研究评估了六个州的PFL政策是否改善了母婴健康。我们使用了一种准实验方法,即差异中的差异,来估计州一级政策实施的影响。我们利用最近开发的方法来解释交错政策实施和治疗效果的异质性。数据来自2004-2021年妊娠风险评估监测系统。主要结局包括母乳喂养、产妇产后抑郁症状和参加产后检查;次要结局包括出生结局。对可能的混杂因素进行多变量回归校正。PFL政策导致母乳喂养持续时间增加(0.53周;95% CI: 0.06至0.99)和抑郁症状减少(-0.93个百分点;95% CI: -1.84 ~ -0.01)。政策也与某些分娩结果的恶化有关,可能反映了子宫内的选择、数据限制或真正的负面影响。根据种族/民族和收入的亚组差异,估计结果在很大程度上是可靠的。在许多州正在考虑或制定政策的关键时刻,以及在关于国家PFL政策实施的持续对话中,本研究为州级PFL政策对健康的影响提供了重要证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Applying Capture Recapture Methods to Estimate the Burden of Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections Using Indian Health Service Medical Records, 2016-2021. Building the Mountain Mama and Baby Cohort: Study Design, Protocol, and Early Prenatal Clinic-based Recruitment Outcomes. Living DAGs: The Future of DAGs in Epidemiology. Quantitative bias analyses to address measurement error in time-to-event endpoints. Initiation of Proton Pump Inhibitors is Associated with Gut Microbiome Diversity and Composition: a new-user target trial emulation within the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1