Concept mapping - increased potential as a retrieval-based task.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2024.2363463
Sina Lenski, Mirlinda Mustafa, Jörg Großschedl
{"title":"Concept mapping - increased potential as a retrieval-based task.","authors":"Sina Lenski, Mirlinda Mustafa, Jörg Großschedl","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2024.2363463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concept mapping is a practical task for enhancing learning performance. Learners usually construct concept maps while studying the learning material or after studying. In the first case, the learning material is available during construction, and learners are less involved in retrieval practice from memory (study-based concept mapping; SCM). In the second case, the learning material is absent during construction, and the learners rely on retrieving information from memory (retrieval-based concept mapping, RCM). RCM is assumed to be associated with lower concept map quality and higher cognitive load but better elaboration and learning performance than SCM. This study investigated how the availability of the learning material influenced these variables in biology classrooms. Unlike other studies, this study provided learners with an authentic learning environment and prior concept mapping training. After the concept mapping training, <i>n</i> = 129 secondary school students were assigned to an SCM or RCM condition in a quasi-experimental design. As expected, students in the RCM condition constructed concept maps of lower quality but outperformed SCM students concerning elaboration activities and learning performance. The perceived intrinsic cognitive load was higher in the RCM condition. The results indicate that using concept mapping as a retrieval practice could support students' learning in biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2363463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concept mapping is a practical task for enhancing learning performance. Learners usually construct concept maps while studying the learning material or after studying. In the first case, the learning material is available during construction, and learners are less involved in retrieval practice from memory (study-based concept mapping; SCM). In the second case, the learning material is absent during construction, and the learners rely on retrieving information from memory (retrieval-based concept mapping, RCM). RCM is assumed to be associated with lower concept map quality and higher cognitive load but better elaboration and learning performance than SCM. This study investigated how the availability of the learning material influenced these variables in biology classrooms. Unlike other studies, this study provided learners with an authentic learning environment and prior concept mapping training. After the concept mapping training, n = 129 secondary school students were assigned to an SCM or RCM condition in a quasi-experimental design. As expected, students in the RCM condition constructed concept maps of lower quality but outperformed SCM students concerning elaboration activities and learning performance. The perceived intrinsic cognitive load was higher in the RCM condition. The results indicate that using concept mapping as a retrieval practice could support students' learning in biology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念图绘制--作为一项基于检索的任务,其潜力越来越大。
概念图是提高学习成绩的一项实用任务。学习者通常在学习材料时或学习后构建概念图。在第一种情况下,构建概念图时学习材料是可用的,学习者较少从记忆中进行检索练习(基于学习的概念图绘制;SCM)。第二种情况是,在构建过程中没有学习材料,学习者依赖于从记忆中检索信息(基于检索的概念映射,RCM)。RCM 被认为与较低的概念图质量和较高的认知负荷有关,但与 SCM 相比,RCM 具有更好的阐释能力和学习成绩。本研究调查了生物课堂上学习材料的可用性如何影响这些变量。与其他研究不同的是,本研究为学习者提供了真实的学习环境和事先的概念图绘制培训。在概念绘图培训后,n = 129 名中学生被分配到单片机或 RCM 条件下的准实验设计中。不出所料,RCM 条件下的学生绘制的概念图质量较低,但在阐述活动和学习成绩方面却优于 SCM 条件下的学生。在 RCM 条件下,感知到的内在认知负荷更高。结果表明,使用概念图作为检索练习可以帮助学生学习生物学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
期刊最新文献
Flashbulb and first-hand memories for campus closings due to COVID-19: consistency and change. Effectiveness of production and drawing as encoding techniques on recall using mixed- and pure-list designs. Inducing positive involuntary mental imagery in daily life using personalized photograph stimuli. Negative life events predict depressive trends: the moderating effect of overgeneral autobiographical memory and early parenting behaviour. You don't understand me! But, I do! Awareness of cross-generational differences in collective remembering of national historic events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1