Validation and determining an optimal cut-off score of the Infant Behavior Checklist for autism spectrum disorder.

PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-06-18 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1002/pcn5.212
Toshinobu Takeda, Hirokazu Osada, Yui Tsuji, Hiroshi Kurita
{"title":"Validation and determining an optimal cut-off score of the Infant Behavior Checklist for autism spectrum disorder.","authors":"Toshinobu Takeda, Hirokazu Osada, Yui Tsuji, Hiroshi Kurita","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Given the escalating prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the persistent paucity of child psychiatrists in Japan, and the need to prepare for unforeseen situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to establish a reliable screening tool. This study aims to validate the Infant Behavior Checklist (IBC) developed by Japanese experts and determine its appropriate cut-off score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 354 clinic-referred children, along with their caregivers, participated in this research. Clinical records, including diagnoses established through the sub-structured diagnostic interviews, and the IBC assessments, were subjected to rigorous statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 24 items, six failed to reach significance to differentiate ASD from non-ASD cases. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the IBC was calculated at 0.77. The IBC total score for ASD cases was significantly higher than that of non-ASD cases. With the chosen cut-off score, the IBC demonstrated an area under the ROC curve of 0.803, along with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 8.03, 0.79, 0.69, 0.34, and 0.94, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IBC exhibits satisfactory internal consistency and content and discriminant validity. The high sensitivity and other associated indices for the optimal cut-off score of the IBC affirm its validity as a screening instrument for ASD. Nevertheless, further investigations are warranted to ascertain the clinical utility of the IBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"3 2","pages":"e212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11187909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Given the escalating prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the persistent paucity of child psychiatrists in Japan, and the need to prepare for unforeseen situations, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to establish a reliable screening tool. This study aims to validate the Infant Behavior Checklist (IBC) developed by Japanese experts and determine its appropriate cut-off score.

Methods: A total of 354 clinic-referred children, along with their caregivers, participated in this research. Clinical records, including diagnoses established through the sub-structured diagnostic interviews, and the IBC assessments, were subjected to rigorous statistical analysis.

Results: Among the 24 items, six failed to reach significance to differentiate ASD from non-ASD cases. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the IBC was calculated at 0.77. The IBC total score for ASD cases was significantly higher than that of non-ASD cases. With the chosen cut-off score, the IBC demonstrated an area under the ROC curve of 0.803, along with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 8.03, 0.79, 0.69, 0.34, and 0.94, respectively.

Conclusion: The IBC exhibits satisfactory internal consistency and content and discriminant validity. The high sensitivity and other associated indices for the optimal cut-off score of the IBC affirm its validity as a screening instrument for ASD. Nevertheless, further investigations are warranted to ascertain the clinical utility of the IBC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证婴儿行为检查表并确定自闭症谱系障碍的最佳临界分数。
目的:鉴于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的发病率不断攀升,日本儿童精神科医生的数量一直很少,而且需要为诸如 COVID-19 大流行等不可预见的情况做好准备,因此建立一个可靠的筛查工具至关重要。本研究旨在验证由日本专家开发的婴儿行为检查表(IBC),并确定其合适的临界分数:方法:共有 354 名诊所转介的儿童及其看护人参与了这项研究。对临床记录(包括通过分结构诊断访谈确定的诊断)和 IBC 评估结果进行了严格的统计分析:在 24 个项目中,有 6 个项目在区分自闭症与非自闭症方面没有达到显著性。经计算,IBC 的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.77。ASD 病例的 IBC 总分明显高于非 ASD 病例。在选定的临界值下,IBC 的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.803,灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 8.03、0.79、0.69、0.34 和 0.94:IBC具有令人满意的内部一致性、内容有效性和区分有效性。IBC的高灵敏度和最佳截断分数的其他相关指数肯定了其作为ASD筛查工具的有效性。然而,要确定 IBC 的临床实用性,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to outpatient care among individuals with pre-existing psychiatric disorders following the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake: A retrospective study. Middle-aged man with primary hyperparathyroidism-associated psychosis: A case report. Launching a child and adolescent psychiatry training program in Mongolia inspired by Japanese models. Long-term mental health crisis among municipal public employees caused by the Fukushima nuclear accident and subsequent disasters: Questionnaire survey 10 years postdisaster. Pivotal role of venous blood gas analysis in the detection of metabolic acidosis due to laxative abuse in an anorexia nervosa patient: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1