Aim: This study examined the longitudinal associations between psychosocial factors in the workplace and the emergence of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) symptoms among Japanese female workers, with a particular focus on psychological distress as a potential moderator.
Methods: We conducted a 6-month follow-up of 2000 full-time Japanese female workers aged 20-39 without PMDD symptoms at baseline. PMDD symptoms were assessed at follow-up using a validated PMDD scale. Psychosocial factors in the workplace (job demands, job control, supervisor and coworker support, and workplace rewards) were measured at baseline using the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. Psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler 6 psychological distress scale (K6), and participants were stratified by K6 scores (K6 < 5 and K6 ≥ 5). Logistic regression analyses were performed.
Results: Of the eligible participants, 1064 completed both surveys (response rate: 61.6%). In the adjusted models, high job control was associated with the emergence of PMDD symptoms among all participants (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, p = 0.025) and those with high psychological distress (OR = 1.37, p = 0.011). Job stability was negatively associated with the emergence of PMDD symptoms among participants with high psychological distress (OR = 0.48, p = 0.010). No significant associations were found among those with low psychological distress.
Conclusion: Job stability was a protective factor for the emergence of PMDD symptoms among female workers with high psychological distress, while job control may act as an enhancing factor in the overall sample and among those with high psychological distress. Ensuring job stability might be a measure to prevent PMDD symptoms, especially for female workers with high psychological distress.
目的:本研究考察了工作场所的社会心理因素与日本女工经前焦虑症(PMDD)症状之间的纵向关联,特别关注心理困扰作为潜在的调节因素。方法:我们对2000名20-39岁无经前不悦症状的日本全职女工进行了为期6个月的随访。随访时使用经验证的经前抑郁量表评估经前抑郁症状。工作场所的社会心理因素(工作要求、工作控制、主管和同事支持以及工作场所奖励)在基线上使用新简要工作压力问卷进行测量。采用Kessler 6心理困扰量表(K6)对参与者进行心理困扰评估,并按K6评分对参与者进行分层(K6结果:在符合条件的参与者中,1064人完成了两项调查,反应率为61.6%)。在调整后的模型中,高工作控制与所有被试(OR = 1.26, p = 0.025)和高心理困扰(OR = 1.37, p = 0.011)的经前抑郁症状的出现相关。在高心理困扰的参与者中,工作稳定性与经前不悦症状的出现呈负相关(OR = 0.48, p = 0.010)。在心理困扰程度低的人群中没有发现明显的关联。结论:工作稳定性是高心理困扰女工经前不悦症状出现的保护因素,而工作控制可能是整体样本和高心理困扰女工经前不悦症状出现的增强因素。确保工作稳定可能是预防经前不悦症症状的一种措施,特别是对于心理压力很大的女工。
{"title":"The association of workplace psychosocial factors on premenstrual dysphoric disorder: A six-month prospective study on Japanese female workers.","authors":"Mako Iida, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Miho Egawa, Yuka Ito, Yoshiaki Kanamori, Rikako Tsuji, Daisuke Nishi, Natsu Sasaki","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70313","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70313","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study examined the longitudinal associations between psychosocial factors in the workplace and the emergence of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) symptoms among Japanese female workers, with a particular focus on psychological distress as a potential moderator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 6-month follow-up of 2000 full-time Japanese female workers aged 20-39 without PMDD symptoms at baseline. PMDD symptoms were assessed at follow-up using a validated PMDD scale. Psychosocial factors in the workplace (job demands, job control, supervisor and coworker support, and workplace rewards) were measured at baseline using the New Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. Psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler 6 psychological distress scale (K6), and participants were stratified by K6 scores (K6 < 5 and K6 ≥ 5). Logistic regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the eligible participants, 1064 completed both surveys (response rate: 61.6%). In the adjusted models, high job control was associated with the emergence of PMDD symptoms among all participants (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26, <i>p</i> = 0.025) and those with high psychological distress (OR = 1.37, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Job stability was negatively associated with the emergence of PMDD symptoms among participants with high psychological distress (OR = 0.48, <i>p</i> = 0.010). No significant associations were found among those with low psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Job stability was a protective factor for the emergence of PMDD symptoms among female workers with high psychological distress, while job control may act as an enhancing factor in the overall sample and among those with high psychological distress. Ensuring job stability might be a measure to prevent PMDD symptoms, especially for female workers with high psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967474/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: Previous research has primarily explored the negative impacts of caregiving on young carers (YCs)' mental health during childhood and adolescence, with limited focus on emerging adulthood. In particular, quantitative evidence on the development of depression in YCs in emerging adulthood is limited, especially regarding its persistence after caregiving ends. To address this, we aimed to assess the mental health of emerging adults with YC experience by categorizing them into past YCs (pYCs) who no longer provide care and those who continue to provide care (current young adult carer/past YCs, cYAC/pYCs) alongside a non-YCs control group. We also aimed to identify factors contributing to depressive symptoms in these groups, focusing on caregiving-related environmental factors during childhood and adolescence.
Methods: Participants aged 18-25 were recruited online and divided into three groups. Demographic information, depressive/anxiety symptoms, well-being, and peer victimization were assessed, and binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the factors contributing to depressive symptoms.
Results: A total of 162 cYAC/pYCs, 161 pYCs, and 534 non-YCs were analyzed. Both the cYAC/pYCs and pYCs groups had higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms than the non-YCs group, with no significant differences between cYAC/pYCs and pYCs. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that female sex, taking care of their own caregiver, solo family caregiving, and experiencing peer victimization were significant predictors of depressive symptoms.
Conclusion: Being a YC has lasting impacts on mental health and the risk of depressive symptoms, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to support this vulnerable population.
{"title":"Impact of young carers' experiences on their mental health in emerging adulthood: Evaluation from a psychiatric perspective.","authors":"Miki Ono, Yuuka Matsuzaki, Minori Sato, Jun Tsuchida, Akiyoshi Shimura, Yu Tamada, Chihiro Morishita, Jiro Masuya, Masayuki Kikkawa, Takeshi Inoue","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70316","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Previous research has primarily explored the negative impacts of caregiving on young carers (YCs)' mental health during childhood and adolescence, with limited focus on emerging adulthood. In particular, quantitative evidence on the development of depression in YCs in emerging adulthood is limited, especially regarding its persistence after caregiving ends. To address this, we aimed to assess the mental health of emerging adults with YC experience by categorizing them into past YCs (pYCs) who no longer provide care and those who continue to provide care (current young adult carer/past YCs, cYAC/pYCs) alongside a non-YCs control group. We also aimed to identify factors contributing to depressive symptoms in these groups, focusing on caregiving-related environmental factors during childhood and adolescence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants aged 18-25 were recruited online and divided into three groups. Demographic information, depressive/anxiety symptoms, well-being, and peer victimization were assessed, and binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the factors contributing to depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 162 cYAC/pYCs, 161 pYCs, and 534 non-YCs were analyzed. Both the cYAC/pYCs and pYCs groups had higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms than the non-YCs group, with no significant differences between cYAC/pYCs and pYCs. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that female sex, taking care of their own caregiver, solo family caregiving, and experiencing peer victimization were significant predictors of depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Being a YC has lasting impacts on mental health and the risk of depressive symptoms, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to support this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967540/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391902","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: Japan maintains exceptionally high psychiatric bed numbers and long hospitalization durations compared to global standards. This study examined prefecture-level associations between psychiatric bed supply, occupational therapy (OT) provision, and community welfare resources, and the average length of stay (ALOS).
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional ecological analysis utilizing the 10th National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB) Open Data and government hospital statistics from fiscal year 2023. Dataset aggregation covered all 47 prefectures. We calculated standardized indicators per 100,000 population for psychiatric bed density, inpatient and outpatient OT claims, and community-based disability welfare facilities. Standardized multivariate regression modeling was employed to identify variables independently associated with ALOS, strictly evaluating the contributions of regional medical and welfare systems.
Results: The analysis identified that psychiatric bed density was most strongly associated with longer ALOS, which is consistent with the supply-induced demand hypothesis. Crucially, however, the regression model revealed that higher utilization rates of outpatient OT and a greater density of community-based welfare facilities were significantly and independently associated with shorter ALOS. Conversely, the volume of inpatient OT provision did not demonstrate a significant independent effect on shortening hospital stays in the adjusted model.
Conclusion: At the prefectural level, psychiatric bed density was independently associated with longer ALOS, whereas outpatient OT utilization and community-based welfare facility density were independently associated with shorter ALOS. These findings suggest that community-based therapeutic and welfare resources may be relevant to shorter hospital stays, although causal inference is limited by the cross-sectional ecological design.
{"title":"Association of community welfare resources and outpatient occupational therapy with psychiatric length of stay: A nationwide analysis in Japan.","authors":"Junya Orui, Keigo Shiraiwa, Saiji Nishida, Takao Inoue, Keiko Yamada, Yasuo Naito, Ryouhei Ishii","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Japan maintains exceptionally high psychiatric bed numbers and long hospitalization durations compared to global standards. This study examined prefecture-level associations between psychiatric bed supply, occupational therapy (OT) provision, and community welfare resources, and the average length of stay (ALOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional ecological analysis utilizing the 10th National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB) Open Data and government hospital statistics from fiscal year 2023. Dataset aggregation covered all 47 prefectures. We calculated standardized indicators per 100,000 population for psychiatric bed density, inpatient and outpatient OT claims, and community-based disability welfare facilities. Standardized multivariate regression modeling was employed to identify variables independently associated with ALOS, strictly evaluating the contributions of regional medical and welfare systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified that psychiatric bed density was most strongly associated with longer ALOS, which is consistent with the supply-induced demand hypothesis. Crucially, however, the regression model revealed that higher utilization rates of outpatient OT and a greater density of community-based welfare facilities were significantly and independently associated with shorter ALOS. Conversely, the volume of inpatient OT provision did not demonstrate a significant independent effect on shortening hospital stays in the adjusted model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the prefectural level, psychiatric bed density was independently associated with longer ALOS, whereas outpatient OT utilization and community-based welfare facility density were independently associated with shorter ALOS. These findings suggest that community-based therapeutic and welfare resources may be relevant to shorter hospital stays, although causal inference is limited by the cross-sectional ecological design.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967587/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-08eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.70314
Masaru Tateno, Takaki Shimode, Koki Ono, Ryotaro Shimomura, Eri Shiraishi, Kotaro Nanba, Yukie Tateno, Ayumi Takano
Aim: Questionnaire-based screening tools for Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) are widely used in clinical and epidemiological research. However, discrepancies between child self-reports and parent reports may complicate the interpretation of screening results, particularly when cutoff-based classifications are applied.
Methods: Participants were 58 adolescents (aged 10-18 years) attending child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinics and their parents. Gaming-related problems were assessed using parallel screening instruments: the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale for Children (IGDS-C) and the Parental version of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale (PIGDS). Parent-child agreement was examined using dimensional analyses (Pearson's correlation), paired comparisons (paired t-test with Wilcoxon signed-rank test as a sensitivity analysis), and categorical agreement indices (concordance rate, Cohen's κ, and McNemar's test) based on the conventional cutoff score.
Results: Parent- and child-reported IGDS scores were moderately correlated (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), indicating substantial dimensional concordance. However, parents reported significantly higher IGDS scores than children (mean difference = -1.09, p < 0.001), a finding confirmed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Categorical agreement based on cutoff-based screening classifications was low (κ = 0.16), with most discordant cases reflecting parent-positive and child-negative classifications. McNemar's test demonstrated a significant asymmetry in these discrepancies.
Conclusion: Although parent and child IGDS scores demonstrate meaningful dimensional concordance, the application of fixed cutoff-based screening classifications substantially reduces agreement, a pattern that may reflect differences in evaluative thresholds between informants. These findings highlight limitations of relying solely on self-reported cutoff-based measures and underscore the need for multi-informant, dimensional approaches when interpreting IGD screening results in youth.
目的:基于问卷的网络游戏障碍(IGD)筛查工具广泛应用于临床和流行病学研究。然而,儿童自我报告和家长报告之间的差异可能会使对筛查结果的解释复杂化,特别是在应用基于截止点的分类时。方法:研究对象为58名在儿童和青少年精神病学门诊就诊的青少年(10-18岁)及其父母。使用平行筛选工具评估游戏相关问题:儿童网络游戏障碍量表(IGDS-C)和家长版网络游戏障碍量表(PIGDS)。采用维度分析(Pearson’s相关性)、配对比较(配对t检验与Wilcoxon符号秩检验作为敏感性分析)和基于常规截断分数的分类协议指数(一致性率、Cohen’s κ和McNemar’s检验)来检验亲子协议。结果:父母和孩子报告的IGDS评分有中度相关性(r = 0.61, p p κ = 0.16),大多数不一致的病例反映了父母阳性和孩子阴性的分类。McNemar的实验证明了这些差异的显著不对称性。结论:尽管父母和儿童的IGDS得分表现出有意义的维度一致性,但基于固定下限的筛选分类的应用大大降低了一致性,这种模式可能反映了举报人之间评估阈值的差异。这些发现强调了仅仅依靠自我报告的截止点测量的局限性,并强调了在解释青少年IGD筛查结果时需要多信息者、多维方法。
{"title":"Parent-child discrepancies in screening for Internet Gaming Disorder: Evidence from a clinical sample of Japanese adolescents.","authors":"Masaru Tateno, Takaki Shimode, Koki Ono, Ryotaro Shimomura, Eri Shiraishi, Kotaro Nanba, Yukie Tateno, Ayumi Takano","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70314","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70314","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Questionnaire-based screening tools for Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) are widely used in clinical and epidemiological research. However, discrepancies between child self-reports and parent reports may complicate the interpretation of screening results, particularly when cutoff-based classifications are applied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 58 adolescents (aged 10-18 years) attending child and adolescent psychiatry outpatient clinics and their parents. Gaming-related problems were assessed using parallel screening instruments: the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale for Children (IGDS-C) and the Parental version of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale (PIGDS). Parent-child agreement was examined using dimensional analyses (Pearson's correlation), paired comparisons (paired <i>t</i>-test with Wilcoxon signed-rank test as a sensitivity analysis), and categorical agreement indices (concordance rate, Cohen's <i>κ</i>, and McNemar's test) based on the conventional cutoff score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parent- and child-reported IGDS scores were moderately correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.61, <i>p</i> < 0.001), indicating substantial dimensional concordance. However, parents reported significantly higher IGDS scores than children (mean difference = -1.09, <i>p</i> < 0.001), a finding confirmed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Categorical agreement based on cutoff-based screening classifications was low (<i>κ</i> = 0.16), with most discordant cases reflecting parent-positive and child-negative classifications. McNemar's test demonstrated a significant asymmetry in these discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although parent and child IGDS scores demonstrate meaningful dimensional concordance, the application of fixed cutoff-based screening classifications substantially reduces agreement, a pattern that may reflect differences in evaluative thresholds between informants. These findings highlight limitations of relying solely on self-reported cutoff-based measures and underscore the need for multi-informant, dimensional approaches when interpreting IGD screening results in youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967513/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Internet gaming disorder symptoms and functional impairment in a non-clinical sample of adolescents and young adults in Japan.","authors":"Masaru Tateno, Akira Imamura, Takeshi Inoue, Takanobu Matsuzaki, Daisuke Jitoku","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70315","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70315","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967619/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-08eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.70317
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.70272.].
[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.70272.]。
{"title":"Correction to \"Factors associated with suicidal ideation in junior high school students with autism spectrum disorder in Japan: A cross-sectional observational study\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70317","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70317","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.70272.].</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12967457/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147391852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: Hikikomori, a condition involving prolonged social withdrawal, has become a major public health and social challenge in Japan and many countries. While support institutions are essential for reaching this population, little is known about how their organizational characteristics influence collaboration with other services.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 1024 hikikomori-related support institutions in Japan between February and March 2021. Institutions were classified using K-means cluster analysis based on staff size, collaboration count, and case volume. Multiple regression models assessed associations between these attributes and levels of external collaboration with health and welfare organizations.
Results: Three distinct institutional clusters were identified. Institutions serving more diverse populations showed higher levels of interorganizational collaboration; a lean, outreach-oriented "Collaborative Core" subgroup exhibited the strongest external engagement.
Conclusion: Structural features such as diversity, functional capacity, and outreach orientation were associated with network collaboration. Policymakers and administrators should consider these structural attributes when designing inclusive and coordinated public mental health services for socially withdrawn populations. The proposed framework may serve as a model for similar contexts across countries.
{"title":"Identifying hub functions and collaboration patterns in hikikomori support networks: A nationwide cross-sectional study.","authors":"Masahide Usami, Yuki Mizumoto, Kumi Inazaki, Yuki Hakoshima, Kotoe Itagaki, Keita Yamamoto, Tetsushi Tsujimoto, Masao Yamasaki, Kazuhiko Saito","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70311","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Hikikomori, a condition involving prolonged social withdrawal, has become a major public health and social challenge in Japan and many countries. While support institutions are essential for reaching this population, little is known about how their organizational characteristics influence collaboration with other services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of 1024 hikikomori-related support institutions in Japan between February and March 2021. Institutions were classified using K-means cluster analysis based on staff size, collaboration count, and case volume. Multiple regression models assessed associations between these attributes and levels of external collaboration with health and welfare organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct institutional clusters were identified. Institutions serving more diverse populations showed higher levels of interorganizational collaboration; a lean, outreach-oriented \"Collaborative Core\" subgroup exhibited the strongest external engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structural features such as diversity, functional capacity, and outreach orientation were associated with network collaboration. Policymakers and administrators should consider these structural attributes when designing inclusive and coordinated public mental health services for socially withdrawn populations. The proposed framework may serve as a model for similar contexts across countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12949849/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147346087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a potentially life-threatening neurological condition characterized by thunderclap headaches and multifocal cerebral arterial vasoconstriction resolving within 3 months. Context-dependent diagnostic bias in psychiatric settings may delay recognition of life-threatening conditions including RCVS.
Case presentation: A 52-year-old Japanese woman with bipolar II disorder stable on lithium developed recurrent thunderclap headaches 9 days after mild COVID-19 infection. Headaches were consistently triggered by hot showers, reached maximal intensity within seconds, and were described as the worst headache of her life. Initial neurosurgical evaluation included non-contrast head CT but attributed symptoms to tension-type headache without vascular imaging. The patient, dissatisfied with this explanation, sought re-evaluation through our psychiatry outpatient clinic. Psychiatric consultation identified characteristic RCVS features, prompting urgent referral to a headache specialist. Magnetic resonance angiography on Day 31 revealed multifocal segmental vasoconstriction confirming RCVS. Calcium channel blocker treatment led to complete symptom resolution with radiological resolution confirmed at Day 100.
Conclusion: This case illustrates how context-dependent diagnostic bias can dangerously delay RCVS recognition in psychiatric settings. Thunderclap headache warrants immediate neuroimaging regardless of psychiatric comorbidity. Psychiatric consultation enabled appropriate diagnosis through collaborative evaluation with specialist neurology, underscoring the essential role of consultation-liaison psychiatry at the medical-psychiatric interface.
{"title":"Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in psychiatric settings: Context-dependent diagnostic bias and consultation-liaison psychiatry practice.","authors":"Kyohei Otani, Nobuyasu Imbe, Ryota Shindo, Shigekazu Kitamura","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70309","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is a potentially life-threatening neurological condition characterized by thunderclap headaches and multifocal cerebral arterial vasoconstriction resolving within 3 months. Context-dependent diagnostic bias in psychiatric settings may delay recognition of life-threatening conditions including RCVS.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 52-year-old Japanese woman with bipolar II disorder stable on lithium developed recurrent thunderclap headaches 9 days after mild COVID-19 infection. Headaches were consistently triggered by hot showers, reached maximal intensity within seconds, and were described as the worst headache of her life. Initial neurosurgical evaluation included non-contrast head CT but attributed symptoms to tension-type headache without vascular imaging. The patient, dissatisfied with this explanation, sought re-evaluation through our psychiatry outpatient clinic. Psychiatric consultation identified characteristic RCVS features, prompting urgent referral to a headache specialist. Magnetic resonance angiography on Day 31 revealed multifocal segmental vasoconstriction confirming RCVS. Calcium channel blocker treatment led to complete symptom resolution with radiological resolution confirmed at Day 100.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case illustrates how context-dependent diagnostic bias can dangerously delay RCVS recognition in psychiatric settings. Thunderclap headache warrants immediate neuroimaging regardless of psychiatric comorbidity. Psychiatric consultation enabled appropriate diagnosis through collaborative evaluation with specialist neurology, underscoring the essential role of consultation-liaison psychiatry at the medical-psychiatric interface.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947242/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147328511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27eCollection Date: 2026-03-01DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.70310
Atefeh Zandifar, Rahim Badrfam
{"title":"Severe self-limiting acute bilateral hearing loss following a low dose of methylphenidate for ADHD treatment: A case report.","authors":"Atefeh Zandifar, Rahim Badrfam","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70310","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70310","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12947243/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147328523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This scoping review mapped the existing literature on the application of asenapine for delirium management in patients with cancer, including prevention and treatment, while summarizing current research trends. The review followed the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. PubMed and Ichushi-Web were searched on June 30, 2025, using the keywords "asenapine," "delirium," and "cancer." Eligible studies included reports on asenapine management for delirium in patients with cancer. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data. Among the six records identified, three studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Two of these were retrospective observational studies, and one was a case report. One retrospective study described six terminally ill patients treated with sublingual asenapine, showing marked improvement in agitation, as measured using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. The other study analyzed 20 patients with advanced cancer and reported reductions in the Agitation Distress Scale scores, particularly among those with poor performance status. Moreover, this case report highlighted the successful use of sublingual asenapine in a patient with aphagia unresponsive to other antipsychotic agents. Across the studies, asenapine was generally well-tolerated, with one suspected dysarthria and no serious adverse events. The current evidence is limited in quantity and quality, and no preventive studies were identified. While preliminary findings suggest that sublingual asenapine may be useful and well-tolerated for treating delirium in patients with cancer, further high-quality studies are warranted.
{"title":"Asenapine for delirium in patients with cancer: A scoping review.","authors":"Tetsuro Ishida, Makoto Kobayakawa, Jun Kako, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Ryoichi Sadahiro, Hitoshi Tanimukai","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70307","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review mapped the existing literature on the application of asenapine for delirium management in patients with cancer, including prevention and treatment, while summarizing current research trends. The review followed the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. PubMed and Ichushi-Web were searched on June 30, 2025, using the keywords \"asenapine,\" \"delirium,\" and \"cancer.\" Eligible studies included reports on asenapine management for delirium in patients with cancer. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data. Among the six records identified, three studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Two of these were retrospective observational studies, and one was a case report. One retrospective study described six terminally ill patients treated with sublingual asenapine, showing marked improvement in agitation, as measured using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. The other study analyzed 20 patients with advanced cancer and reported reductions in the Agitation Distress Scale scores, particularly among those with poor performance status. Moreover, this case report highlighted the successful use of sublingual asenapine in a patient with aphagia unresponsive to other antipsychotic agents. Across the studies, asenapine was generally well-tolerated, with one suspected dysarthria and no serious adverse events. The current evidence is limited in quantity and quality, and no preventive studies were identified. While preliminary findings suggest that sublingual asenapine may be useful and well-tolerated for treating delirium in patients with cancer, further high-quality studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"e70307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12936851/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147328482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}