Smartphone-based study reminders can be a double-edged sword.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH npj Science of Learning Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1038/s41539-024-00253-7
Lea Nobbe, Jasmin Breitwieser, Daniel Biedermann, Garvin Brod
{"title":"Smartphone-based study reminders can be a double-edged sword.","authors":"Lea Nobbe, Jasmin Breitwieser, Daniel Biedermann, Garvin Brod","doi":"10.1038/s41539-024-00253-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reminders are a popular feature in smartphone apps designed to promote desirable behaviors that are best performed regularly. But can they also promote students' regular studying? In the present study with 85 lower secondary school students aged 10-12, we combined a smartphone-based between- and within-person experimental manipulation with logfile data of a vocabulary learning app. Students were scheduled to receive reminders on 16 days during the 36-day intervention period. Findings suggest that reminders can be a double-edged sword. The within-person experimental manipulation allowed a comparison of study probability on days with and without reminders. Students were more likely to study on days they received a reminder compared to days when they did not receive a reminder. However, when compared to a control group that never received reminders, the effect was not due to students studying more frequently on days with reminders. Instead, they studied less frequently on days without reminders than students in the control group. This effect increased over the study period, with students becoming increasingly less likely to study on days without reminders. Taken together, these results suggest a detrimental side effect of reminders: students become overly reliant on them.</p>","PeriodicalId":48503,"journal":{"name":"npj Science of Learning","volume":"9 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11192903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Science of Learning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00253-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reminders are a popular feature in smartphone apps designed to promote desirable behaviors that are best performed regularly. But can they also promote students' regular studying? In the present study with 85 lower secondary school students aged 10-12, we combined a smartphone-based between- and within-person experimental manipulation with logfile data of a vocabulary learning app. Students were scheduled to receive reminders on 16 days during the 36-day intervention period. Findings suggest that reminders can be a double-edged sword. The within-person experimental manipulation allowed a comparison of study probability on days with and without reminders. Students were more likely to study on days they received a reminder compared to days when they did not receive a reminder. However, when compared to a control group that never received reminders, the effect was not due to students studying more frequently on days with reminders. Instead, they studied less frequently on days without reminders than students in the control group. This effect increased over the study period, with students becoming increasingly less likely to study on days without reminders. Taken together, these results suggest a detrimental side effect of reminders: students become overly reliant on them.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于智能手机的学习提醒可能是一把双刃剑。
在智能手机应用程序中,提醒是一项很受欢迎的功能,旨在促进最好定期进行的理想行为。但它们是否也能促进学生定期学习呢?本研究以 85 名 10-12 岁的初中生为对象,将基于智能手机的人际和人内实验操作与词汇学习应用程序的日志数据相结合。在为期 36 天的干预期间,学生们有 16 天会收到提醒。研究结果表明,提醒可能是一把双刃剑。通过人内实验操作,可以比较在有提醒和没有提醒的日子里的学习概率。与没有收到提醒的日子相比,学生在收到提醒的日子更有可能学习。然而,与从未收到提醒的对照组相比,这种效果并不是因为学生在收到提醒的日子里学习更频繁。相反,与对照组的学生相比,他们在没有提醒的日子里学习的频率更低。这种效应随着研究时间的推移而增加,学生在没有提醒的日子里学习的可能性越来越小。综合来看,这些结果表明了提醒的有害副作用:学生会过度依赖提醒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal predictions guide attention throughout the adult lifespan. Interbrain neural correlates of self and other integration in joint statistical learning. Feature versus object in interpreting working memory capacity. Mathematics interest, self-efficacy, and anxiety predict STEM career choice in emerging adulthood. Enhancing mathematical learning outcomes through a low-cost single-channel BCI system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1