Prevalence of tuberculosis infection among contacts of drug-resistant tuberculosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 14.3 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106198
Temesgen Yihunie Akalu , Archie C.A. Clements , Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes , Beth Gilmour , Kefyalew Addis Alene
{"title":"Prevalence of tuberculosis infection among contacts of drug-resistant tuberculosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Temesgen Yihunie Akalu ,&nbsp;Archie C.A. Clements ,&nbsp;Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes ,&nbsp;Beth Gilmour ,&nbsp;Kefyalew Addis Alene","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Contact investigations with drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) patients have demonstrated a high prevalence of tuberculosis infection (TBI). However, the prevalence of TBI among individuals in close contact with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients is poorly understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of TBI among household and non-household contacts of DR-TB patients.</p></div><div><h3>Method and analysis</h3><p>We searched five databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)) from inception to 2 June 2023. All studies that reported the prevalence of TBI among DR-TB contacts were included in the study. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of TBI with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sub-group analyses were conducted using study characteristics as covariates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty studies involving 7659 study participants from 19 countries were included. The pooled prevalence of TBI among DR-TB contacts was 36.52% (95% CI: 30.27–42.77). The sub-group analysis showed considerable heterogeneity in the estimates, with the highest prevalence reported in Southeast Asia (80.74%; 95% CI: 74.09–87.39), household contacts (38.60%; 95% CI: 30.07–47.14), lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) (54.72; 95% CI: 35.90, 73.55), children (43.27%; 95% CI: 25.50, 61.04), and studies conducted between 2004 and 2012 (45.10; 95% CI: 32.44, 57.76).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The prevalence of TBI among DR-TB contacts was high, with substantial regional variations. Further research is needed to determine the drug susceptibility status of TBI in DR-TB contacts.</p></div><div><h3>Protocol registration</h3><p>The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023390339).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001324/pdfft?md5=5ccc40a0649eb7f3d3766a5ff510ea58&pid=1-s2.0-S0163445324001324-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445324001324","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Contact investigations with drug-susceptible tuberculosis (DS-TB) patients have demonstrated a high prevalence of tuberculosis infection (TBI). However, the prevalence of TBI among individuals in close contact with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) patients is poorly understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of TBI among household and non-household contacts of DR-TB patients.

Method and analysis

We searched five databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)) from inception to 2 June 2023. All studies that reported the prevalence of TBI among DR-TB contacts were included in the study. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of TBI with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Sub-group analyses were conducted using study characteristics as covariates.

Results

Thirty studies involving 7659 study participants from 19 countries were included. The pooled prevalence of TBI among DR-TB contacts was 36.52% (95% CI: 30.27–42.77). The sub-group analysis showed considerable heterogeneity in the estimates, with the highest prevalence reported in Southeast Asia (80.74%; 95% CI: 74.09–87.39), household contacts (38.60%; 95% CI: 30.07–47.14), lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) (54.72; 95% CI: 35.90, 73.55), children (43.27%; 95% CI: 25.50, 61.04), and studies conducted between 2004 and 2012 (45.10; 95% CI: 32.44, 57.76).

Conclusion

The prevalence of TBI among DR-TB contacts was high, with substantial regional variations. Further research is needed to determine the drug susceptibility status of TBI in DR-TB contacts.

Protocol registration

The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023390339).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耐药性肺结核患者接触者中的肺结核感染率:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
导言:与药敏结核病(DS-TB)患者的接触调查显示,结核感染(TBI)的发病率很高。然而,人们对与耐药性肺结核(DR-TB)患者密切接触者的结核感染率知之甚少。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定耐药结核病患者的家庭和非家庭接触者中的结核感染率:我们检索了从开始到 2023 年 6 月 2 日的五个数据库(Medline、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL))。所有报告 DR-TB 感染者中创伤性脑损伤患病率的研究均被纳入本研究。研究采用随机效应荟萃分析法估算了TBI的总患病率,并得出了95%的置信区间(CI)。以研究特征作为协变量进行了分组分析:共纳入了 30 项研究,涉及 19 个国家的 7659 名研究参与者。在 DR-TB 接触者中,TBI 的合计患病率为 36.52%(95% CI:30.27-42.77)。亚组分析显示,估计值存在相当大的异质性,东南亚(80.74%;95% CI:74.09-87.39)、家庭接触者(38.60%;95% CI:30.结论:结论:DR-TB感染者中的创伤性脑损伤发病率很高,但地区差异很大。需要进一步研究以确定 DR-TB 接触者中 TBI 的药物敏感性状况:该方案已在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42023390339)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection
Journal of Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
45.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
475
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection. Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.
期刊最新文献
Alternating magnetic fields (AMF) and linezolid reduce Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in a large animal implant model The recent rapid rise in pertussis in Chaoyang District, Beijing: Improved recognition and diagnostic capabilities Corrigendum to “The relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing hospitalization and mortality: A meta-analysis of evidence from randomized trials” [J Infect 89 (2024) 106187] Chatbots are just as good as professors in both factual recall and clinical scenario analysis: Emergence of a new tool in clinical microbiology and infectious disease Microbiology and outcomes of tubo-ovarian abscesses: A 5-year cohort of 105 cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1