Characterization of the supervision of clinical reasoning by nurse anesthetists with student nurse anesthetists: a qualitative study

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Recherche en soins infirmiers Pub Date : 2024-06-26
Agnès Saint-Sulpice, David Naudin
{"title":"Characterization of the supervision of clinical reasoning by nurse anesthetists with student nurse anesthetists: a qualitative study","authors":"Agnès Saint-Sulpice, David Naudin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Errors in reasoning are the main causes of poor decision-making in clinical practice. To remedy this, many studies highlight the importance of supervising clinical reasoning during medical internships.\nAlthough decision-making is an ongoing process at all key moments of the perioperative period, there are no studies on the supervision of clinical reasoning during student nurse anesthetist internships.\nThe objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of the supervision of clinical reasoning by anesthesia professionals with student nurse anesthetists.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A multicenter qualitative study was carried out using observations and individual interviews with five nurse anesthetists and five students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes are identified : the characteristics of the learner’s and supervisor’s posture ; the teaching methods used ; and the specificities of clinical reasoning.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>The nurse anesthetists question clinical reasoning only when they detect difficulties in the student. However, no traceability is carried out. Students spontaneously verbalize their clinical reasoning when unexpected events occur.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results will be used as a basis for a new tool for tracing learning during internships.</p>","PeriodicalId":94187,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en soins infirmiers","volume":"156 1","pages":"67-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en soins infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Errors in reasoning are the main causes of poor decision-making in clinical practice. To remedy this, many studies highlight the importance of supervising clinical reasoning during medical internships. Although decision-making is an ongoing process at all key moments of the perioperative period, there are no studies on the supervision of clinical reasoning during student nurse anesthetist internships. The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of the supervision of clinical reasoning by anesthesia professionals with student nurse anesthetists.

Methodology: A multicenter qualitative study was carried out using observations and individual interviews with five nurse anesthetists and five students.

Results: Three themes are identified : the characteristics of the learner’s and supervisor’s posture ; the teaching methods used ; and the specificities of clinical reasoning.

Analysis: The nurse anesthetists question clinical reasoning only when they detect difficulties in the student. However, no traceability is carried out. Students spontaneously verbalize their clinical reasoning when unexpected events occur.

Discussion: The results will be used as a basis for a new tool for tracing learning during internships.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉师护士对麻醉师学生临床推理的监督特点:一项定性研究。
导言 :推理错误是临床实践中决策失误的主要原因。为了纠正这一问题,许多研究都强调了在医学实习期间监督临床推理的重要性。虽然决策是围手术期所有关键时刻的一个持续过程,但目前还没有关于麻醉师学生实习期间临床推理监督的研究。本研究旨在确定麻醉专业人员对麻醉师学生临床推理的监督特点。研究方法采用观察和个别访谈的方法,对 5 名麻醉护士和 5 名学生进行了多中心定性研究。结果 :确定了三个主题 :学习者和指导者姿势的特点’;使用的教学方法 ;临床推理的特殊性。分析 :麻醉护士只有在发现学生存在困难时,才会对临床推理提出质疑。但是,没有进行追踪。当突发事件发生时,学生会自发地用语言表达自己的临床推理。讨论这些结果将作为新工具的基础,用于追踪实习期间的学习情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond the obstacles : diving into the heart of interventions promoting the involvement of relatives in intensive care unit Characterization of the supervision of clinical reasoning by nurse anesthetists with student nurse anesthetists: a qualitative study Models for designing health-oriented nursing practice : contributions to nursing practice and the nursing discipline Nursing education in initial training according to participants in the webinar organised by the French « Association de recherche en soins infirmiers » in 2024 Methodological and theoretical contributions of critical discourse analysis to nursing research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1