Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation.

Contraception Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110530
Sarah Horvath, Li Wang, William Calo, Mark H Yazer
{"title":"Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation.","authors":"Sarah Horvath, Li Wang, William Calo, Mark H Yazer","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To perform cost analyses of foregoing RhD blood type testing and administration of Rh immunoglobulin (RhIg) for bleeding in pregnancy at <12 weeks gestation in the United States.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We created a decision-analytic model comparing the current standard treatment pathway for patients who have threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortion in the United States, with a new pathway foregoing RhD testing and administration of RhIg for those who are RhD-negative at <12 weeks gestation, assuming that the risk of sensitization is 0%. We derived population and cost estimates from the current literature and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to screen to avoid one case of fatal hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. We performed sensitivity analyses assuming Rh-sensitization risks of 1.5% and 3% and varying the subsequent pregnancy rates from 44% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The annual savings to health care payers in the United States of foregoing RhD testing and RhIg administration with bleeding events at <12 weeks are $5.5 million/100,000 total pregnancies, assuming the sensitization risk is 0%. In sensitivity analyses with a sensitization risk of 1.5% and subsequent pregnancy rate of 84.3% foregoing Rh testing and RhIg administration would save $2.8 million/100,000 pregnancies, with a NNT of 7322 and a number needed to screen of 48,816. At a 3% sensitization rate, the current standard treatment pathway is most economical.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an opportunity to save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies by withholding RhIg in specific situations and conserving it for use later in pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Cost analyses support foregoing RhD blood type screening and RhIg administration at <12 weeks gestation if the sensitization rate is <3%. By deimplementing this low-value care, payers in the United States can save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies and conserve RhIg for use later in pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To perform cost analyses of foregoing RhD blood type testing and administration of Rh immunoglobulin (RhIg) for bleeding in pregnancy at <12 weeks gestation in the United States.

Study design: We created a decision-analytic model comparing the current standard treatment pathway for patients who have threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortion in the United States, with a new pathway foregoing RhD testing and administration of RhIg for those who are RhD-negative at <12 weeks gestation, assuming that the risk of sensitization is 0%. We derived population and cost estimates from the current literature and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to screen to avoid one case of fatal hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. We performed sensitivity analyses assuming Rh-sensitization risks of 1.5% and 3% and varying the subsequent pregnancy rates from 44% to 100%.

Results: The annual savings to health care payers in the United States of foregoing RhD testing and RhIg administration with bleeding events at <12 weeks are $5.5 million/100,000 total pregnancies, assuming the sensitization risk is 0%. In sensitivity analyses with a sensitization risk of 1.5% and subsequent pregnancy rate of 84.3% foregoing Rh testing and RhIg administration would save $2.8 million/100,000 pregnancies, with a NNT of 7322 and a number needed to screen of 48,816. At a 3% sensitization rate, the current standard treatment pathway is most economical.

Conclusions: There is an opportunity to save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies by withholding RhIg in specific situations and conserving it for use later in pregnancy.

Implications: Cost analyses support foregoing RhD blood type screening and RhIg administration at <12 weeks gestation if the sensitization rate is <3%. By deimplementing this low-value care, payers in the United States can save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies and conserve RhIg for use later in pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠 12 周以下孕妇因出血而放弃注射 Rh 免疫球蛋白的经济分析。
研究目的对妊娠期出血患者放弃 RhD 血型检测和注射 Rh 免疫球蛋白(RhIg)进行成本分析 研究设计:我们创建了一个决策分析模型,比较了美国目前对受到威胁、自然流产或人工流产患者的标准治疗方法,以及对 RhD 阴性患者放弃 RhD 血型检测和注射 RhIg 的新方法:结论:美国医疗支付者每年可因放弃 RhD 检测和对 RhD 阴性的出血患者注射 RhIg 而节省费用:通过在特定情况下不使用 RhIg 并将其保留到妊娠后期使用,美国医疗支付者有机会为每 10 万例妊娠节省高达 550 万美元:成本分析支持在下列情况下放弃 RhD 血型筛查和 RhIg 给药
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation. Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study. Ongoing contraceptive goals of patients who did not achieve desired postpartum permanent contraception prior to hospital discharge. The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study. Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1