Incidence of venous thromboembolic disease and risk of bleeding in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies: A retrospective study

{"title":"Incidence of venous thromboembolic disease and risk of bleeding in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies: A retrospective study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our objectives were to describe the use of thromboprophylaxis and the incidence of VTE/bleeding in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies (HM).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study (2014–2022).</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Medic-Surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in a tertiary care academic center.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>Adult patients admitted to ICU with a concomitant diagnosis of a hematological malignancy.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Main variables of interest</h3><div>We analyzed demographic data, use of thromboprophylaxis and secondary outcomes that included incidence of VTE (venous thromboembolism), bleeding, mortality, severity scores and organ support. We applied a multivariable logistic regression model to examine the risk of thrombosis in the ICU.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 862 ICU admissions (813 unique patients). Thromboprophylaxis was given during 65% of admissions (LMWH 14%, UFH 8%, and SCDs 43%); in 21% it was contraindicated due to thrombocytopenia; 14% of cases lacked documentation on prophylaxis. There were 38 unique incident cases of VTE (27 DVT, 11 PE), constituting 4.4% of ICU episodes. Most of VTE cases happened in patients with various degrees of thrombocytopenia. In the multivariable analysis, SOFA score on the first ICU day was independently associated (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76−0.96) with the risk of VTE. Bleeding occurred in 7.2% (minor) and 14.4% (major) of episodes; most frequent sites being CNS, abdomen/GI and pulmonary.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this cohort of critically ill patients with HM, there was considerable variability in the utilization of DVT prophylaxis, with predominant use of SCDs. The incidence of VTE was 4.4% and major bleeding 14%.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><div>NCT05396157. Venous Thromboembolism in Hematologic Malignancy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients: a Retrospective Study (<span><span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":"48 11","pages":"Pages e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2173572724001413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Our objectives were to describe the use of thromboprophylaxis and the incidence of VTE/bleeding in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies (HM).

Design

Retrospective cohort study (2014–2022).

Setting

Medic-Surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in a tertiary care academic center.

Patients

Adult patients admitted to ICU with a concomitant diagnosis of a hematological malignancy.

Interventions

None.

Main variables of interest

We analyzed demographic data, use of thromboprophylaxis and secondary outcomes that included incidence of VTE (venous thromboembolism), bleeding, mortality, severity scores and organ support. We applied a multivariable logistic regression model to examine the risk of thrombosis in the ICU.

Results

We included 862 ICU admissions (813 unique patients). Thromboprophylaxis was given during 65% of admissions (LMWH 14%, UFH 8%, and SCDs 43%); in 21% it was contraindicated due to thrombocytopenia; 14% of cases lacked documentation on prophylaxis. There were 38 unique incident cases of VTE (27 DVT, 11 PE), constituting 4.4% of ICU episodes. Most of VTE cases happened in patients with various degrees of thrombocytopenia. In the multivariable analysis, SOFA score on the first ICU day was independently associated (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76−0.96) with the risk of VTE. Bleeding occurred in 7.2% (minor) and 14.4% (major) of episodes; most frequent sites being CNS, abdomen/GI and pulmonary.

Conclusions

In this cohort of critically ill patients with HM, there was considerable variability in the utilization of DVT prophylaxis, with predominant use of SCDs. The incidence of VTE was 4.4% and major bleeding 14%.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT05396157. Venous Thromboembolism in Hematologic Malignancy and Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients: a Retrospective Study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液系统恶性肿瘤重症患者的静脉血栓栓塞性疾病发病率和出血风险:回顾性研究。
目的我们的目标是描述血液系统恶性肿瘤(HM)重症患者血栓预防措施的使用情况以及VTE/出血的发生率:回顾性队列研究(2014-2022年):地点:一家三级医疗学术中心的内外科重症监护病房(ICU):干预措施:无:干预措施:无:我们分析了人口统计学数据、血栓预防措施的使用情况以及次要结果,包括VTE(静脉血栓栓塞症)发生率、出血、死亡率、严重程度评分和器官支持。我们采用多变量逻辑回归模型来研究重症监护病房血栓形成的风险:我们纳入了 862 例重症监护病房入院患者(813 例患者)。65%的入院患者接受了血栓预防治疗(LMWH 14%、UFH 8%、SCDs 43%);21%的患者因血小板减少而禁用血栓预防治疗;14%的病例缺乏预防治疗记录。VTE病例共有38例(深静脉血栓27例、聚乙烯醇11例),占重症监护病房病例的4.4%。大多数 VTE 病例发生在不同程度血小板减少的患者身上。在多变量分析中,ICU 第一天的 SOFA 评分与 VTE 风险独立相关(OR 0.85,95% CI 0.76-0.96)。7.2%(轻微)和14.4%(严重)的出血发生在中枢神经系统、腹部/消化道和肺部:结论:在这批 HM 重症患者中,深静脉血栓预防措施的使用存在很大差异,主要使用 SCD。VTE发生率为4.4%,大出血发生率为14%:临床试验注册:NCT05396157。血液恶性肿瘤和造血细胞移植患者静脉血栓栓塞症:一项回顾性研究》(https://clinicaltrials.gov/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation and concordance of HACOR and IROX scales in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received non-invasive ventilation in two intensive care units. From geometric equations to dynamic strategies: advances in the personalization of mechanical ventilation through mechanical power. High flow in tracheostomized patients on their first attempt to wean from mechanical ventilation: More questions on the table. Shocked and moved. Early mobilisation in cardiogenic shock. Early mobilisation in patients with shock and receiving vasoactive drugs in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1