Experimental investigation of the effects of energy ratio and combustion chamber design on engine performance and emissions in a hydrogen-diesel dual-fuel CRDI engine

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Atmospheric Pollution Research Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1016/j.apr.2024.102235
Nurullah Gültekin , Murat Ciniviz
{"title":"Experimental investigation of the effects of energy ratio and combustion chamber design on engine performance and emissions in a hydrogen-diesel dual-fuel CRDI engine","authors":"Nurullah Gültekin ,&nbsp;Murat Ciniviz","doi":"10.1016/j.apr.2024.102235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In compression ignition engines, the use of hydrogen-diesel dual fuel mode has a positive impact on engine performance and emissions. To enhance the impact of hydrogen in dual-fuel mode, it is crucial to properly adjust the energy ratio and design the combustion chamber for dual-fuel mode. This study focuses on these two situations. The study conducted a literature review and designed and manufactured two combustion chambers (Natural Gyration 1, Natural Gyration 2) suitable for dual fuel mode. Using the original combustion chamber and the manufactured combustion chambers, at a constant engine speed of 1850 rpm, at five different loads (3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, and 9 Nm), and at three different hydrogen injection times (1.6, 1.8, and 2.0), tests were performed. Engine performance and emission data obtained as a result of the tests were examined. Tests revealed that at a load of 9 Nm and with a hydrogen energy ratio of 12%, the Natural Gyration 1 combustion chamber increased the internal cylinder maximum pressure by 1.41%, reduced the specific energy consumption by 2.29%, and reduced particulate emissions by 8.82%. On the other hand, it was determined that the Natural Gyration 2 combustion chamber reduced the maximum cylinder internal pressure by 1.98%, increased the specific energy consumption by 2.66%, and soot emissions by 5% at the same load and hydrogen energy ratio.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8604,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Pollution Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1309104224002009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In compression ignition engines, the use of hydrogen-diesel dual fuel mode has a positive impact on engine performance and emissions. To enhance the impact of hydrogen in dual-fuel mode, it is crucial to properly adjust the energy ratio and design the combustion chamber for dual-fuel mode. This study focuses on these two situations. The study conducted a literature review and designed and manufactured two combustion chambers (Natural Gyration 1, Natural Gyration 2) suitable for dual fuel mode. Using the original combustion chamber and the manufactured combustion chambers, at a constant engine speed of 1850 rpm, at five different loads (3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, and 9 Nm), and at three different hydrogen injection times (1.6, 1.8, and 2.0), tests were performed. Engine performance and emission data obtained as a result of the tests were examined. Tests revealed that at a load of 9 Nm and with a hydrogen energy ratio of 12%, the Natural Gyration 1 combustion chamber increased the internal cylinder maximum pressure by 1.41%, reduced the specific energy consumption by 2.29%, and reduced particulate emissions by 8.82%. On the other hand, it was determined that the Natural Gyration 2 combustion chamber reduced the maximum cylinder internal pressure by 1.98%, increased the specific energy consumption by 2.66%, and soot emissions by 5% at the same load and hydrogen energy ratio.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氢-柴油双燃料 CRDI 发动机能量比和燃烧室设计对发动机性能和排放影响的实验研究
在压燃式发动机中,使用氢-柴油双燃料模式对发动机性能和排放有积极影响。要提高氢在双燃料模式下的影响,关键是要正确调整能量比,并设计出适合双燃料模式的燃烧室。本研究主要针对这两种情况进行研究。该研究进行了文献综述,并设计和制造了两个适合双燃料模式的燃烧室(自然回旋 1、自然回旋 2)。使用原始燃烧室和制造的燃烧室,在发动机转速恒定为 1850 rpm、五种不同负载(3、4.5、6、7.5 和 9 Nm)和三种不同氢气喷射时间(1.6、1.8 和 2.0)下进行了测试。对测试获得的发动机性能和排放数据进行了检验。测试结果表明,在负载为 9 牛米、氢能比为 12% 的情况下,自然回旋 1 燃烧室可将气缸内部最大压力提高 1.41%,将比能量消耗降低 2.29%,并将颗粒物排放量降低 8.82%。另一方面,在相同负载和氢能比的情况下,自然回旋 2 燃烧室的气缸内部最大压力降低了 1.98%,比能耗增加了 2.66%,烟尘排放量减少了 5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Pollution Research
Atmospheric Pollution Research ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Pollution Research (APR) is an international journal designed for the publication of articles on air pollution. Papers should present novel experimental results, theory and modeling of air pollution on local, regional, or global scales. Areas covered are research on inorganic, organic, and persistent organic air pollutants, air quality monitoring, air quality management, atmospheric dispersion and transport, air-surface (soil, water, and vegetation) exchange of pollutants, dry and wet deposition, indoor air quality, exposure assessment, health effects, satellite measurements, natural emissions, atmospheric chemistry, greenhouse gases, and effects on climate change.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Impacts of the East Asia monsoon on the PM2.5 acidity in Hanoi BTEX concentration and health risk assessment in automobile workshops The dynamic evolution characteristics of PM2.5 concentrations and health risk assessment during typical forest fires in China It's raining PFAS in South Florida: Occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wet atmospheric deposition from Miami-Dade, South Florida
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1