Heterogeneous technology-induced global CO2 emission reduction and emission forecasting since the Kyoto era

IF 10.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Energy Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123678
Chong Xu , Zengqiang Qin , Jiandong Chen , Jiangxue Zhang
{"title":"Heterogeneous technology-induced global CO2 emission reduction and emission forecasting since the Kyoto era","authors":"Chong Xu ,&nbsp;Zengqiang Qin ,&nbsp;Jiandong Chen ,&nbsp;Jiangxue Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While identifying the drivers of global CO<sub>2</sub> emission is crucial for climate change mitigation, the heterogeneous technology-related drivers (e.g., technological change and efficiency of energy and CO<sub>2</sub> emission) were ignored to a large extent at a global scale, hindering to formulate heterogenous climate policies. Moreover, the projection of CO<sub>2</sub> emission was also not well compared for countries. Here, the study investigated the heterogeneous technology-related drivers of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in time and space simultaneously in 42 major emitter countries over 1998–2020 by extending the spatiotemporal production-theoretical decomposition models, and compared the different performances for forecasting CO<sub>2</sub> emission by traditional time-series models and several machine learning models. Key findings as follows: first, drivers of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions exhibit significant heterogeneity across countries where the effects of energy usage technology gap and CO<sub>2</sub> emission technology gap were negative drivers for USA, South Korea, and the Czech Republic and potential energy intensity effect was the negative driver in countries like China, Russia, Japan, and India. Second, the effects of within-GDP per capita and within- population size were the important drivers affecting global CO<sub>2</sub> emission difference. Third, general regression neural network achieved the best forecasting performance on average compared with other models in the study. The study highlights the importance of formulating climate policies based on heterogeneous technology and emission forecast modeling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924010614","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While identifying the drivers of global CO2 emission is crucial for climate change mitigation, the heterogeneous technology-related drivers (e.g., technological change and efficiency of energy and CO2 emission) were ignored to a large extent at a global scale, hindering to formulate heterogenous climate policies. Moreover, the projection of CO2 emission was also not well compared for countries. Here, the study investigated the heterogeneous technology-related drivers of CO2 emissions in time and space simultaneously in 42 major emitter countries over 1998–2020 by extending the spatiotemporal production-theoretical decomposition models, and compared the different performances for forecasting CO2 emission by traditional time-series models and several machine learning models. Key findings as follows: first, drivers of CO2 emissions exhibit significant heterogeneity across countries where the effects of energy usage technology gap and CO2 emission technology gap were negative drivers for USA, South Korea, and the Czech Republic and potential energy intensity effect was the negative driver in countries like China, Russia, Japan, and India. Second, the effects of within-GDP per capita and within- population size were the important drivers affecting global CO2 emission difference. Third, general regression neural network achieved the best forecasting performance on average compared with other models in the study. The study highlights the importance of formulating climate policies based on heterogeneous technology and emission forecast modeling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
异质技术引发的全球二氧化碳减排和京都时代以来的排放预测
虽然确定全球二氧化碳排放的驱动因素对减缓气候变化至关重要,但在全球范围内,与技术相关的各种驱动因素(如能源和二氧化碳排放的技术变革和效率)在很大程度上被忽视,从而阻碍了制定各种气候政策。此外,对各国二氧化碳排放量的预测也没有进行很好的比较。本研究通过扩展时空生产理论分解模型,在时间和空间上同时研究了 1998-2020 年间 42 个主要排放国二氧化碳排放的异质技术相关驱动因素,并比较了传统时间序列模型和若干机器学习模型在预测二氧化碳排放方面的不同表现。主要发现如下:首先,二氧化碳排放的驱动因素在不同国家表现出显著的异质性,其中能源使用技术差距和二氧化碳排放技术差距的影响对美国、韩国和捷克是负驱动因素,而潜在能源强度效应则是中国、俄罗斯、日本和印度等国的负驱动因素。其次,人均国内生产总值和人口规模效应是影响全球二氧化碳排放差异的重要驱动因素。第三,与其他模型相比,一般回归神经网络的平均预测性能最好。该研究强调了基于异质技术和排放预测模型制定气候政策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive framework on wind energy: A sustainable site selection under uncertainty and reliability, layout optimization and 7E analysis Physically rational data augmentation for energy consumption estimation of electric vehicles Multi-objective optimization with Q-learning for cruise and power allocation control parameters of connected fuel cell hybrid vehicles Robust decomposition and tracking strategy for demand response enhanced virtual power plants Research on optimization strategy of futures hedging dependent on market state
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1